Budgeting challenges on the path towards universal health coverage: the case of Benin.

Benin Budgeting Health financing Public expenditure management Strategic purchasing Universal health coverage

Journal

Health economics review
ISSN: 2191-1991
Titre abrégé: Health Econ Rev
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101583209

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 23 03 2020
accepted: 25 08 2020
entrez: 5 9 2020
pubmed: 6 9 2020
medline: 6 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In its pursuance of universal health coverage (UHC), the government of Benin is piloting a project of mandatory social insurance for health entitled "ARCH". We analysed budget data and ARCH documents, and conducted four observation missions in Benin between March 2018 and January 2020. Results are presented in terms of the three classical objectives of public expenditure management. The government of Benin faces important budgeting challenges when it comes to implementing the ARCH social insurance project: (i) the fiscal space is quite limited, there is a limited potential for new taxes and these may not benefit the ARCH funding, hence the need to prioritise fiscal resources without jeopardising other areas; (ii) the purchasing of health services should be more strategic so as to increase allocative efficiency and equity; (iii) the efficiency of the expenditure process needs to be improved, and more autonomy needs to be devoted to the operational level, so as to ensure that health facilities are reimbursed in a timely fashion in order to meet insured people's health costs, in such a way as to avoid jeopardizing the financial equilibrium of these facilities. The important budgeting challenges faced by Benin when it comes to implementing its UHC policy are also faced by many other African countries. It is important to avoid a situation in which the resources dedicated by the government to the social health insurance system are at the expense of a reduction in the financing of preventive and promotional primary healthcare services.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In its pursuance of universal health coverage (UHC), the government of Benin is piloting a project of mandatory social insurance for health entitled "ARCH".
METHODS METHODS
We analysed budget data and ARCH documents, and conducted four observation missions in Benin between March 2018 and January 2020. Results are presented in terms of the three classical objectives of public expenditure management.
RESULTS RESULTS
The government of Benin faces important budgeting challenges when it comes to implementing the ARCH social insurance project: (i) the fiscal space is quite limited, there is a limited potential for new taxes and these may not benefit the ARCH funding, hence the need to prioritise fiscal resources without jeopardising other areas; (ii) the purchasing of health services should be more strategic so as to increase allocative efficiency and equity; (iii) the efficiency of the expenditure process needs to be improved, and more autonomy needs to be devoted to the operational level, so as to ensure that health facilities are reimbursed in a timely fashion in order to meet insured people's health costs, in such a way as to avoid jeopardizing the financial equilibrium of these facilities.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The important budgeting challenges faced by Benin when it comes to implementing its UHC policy are also faced by many other African countries. It is important to avoid a situation in which the resources dedicated by the government to the social health insurance system are at the expense of a reduction in the financing of preventive and promotional primary healthcare services.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32889650
doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00286-9
pii: 10.1186/s13561-020-00286-9
pmc: PMC7474488
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

28

Subventions

Organisme : Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles
ID : ARC grant for concerted action research

Références

Health Policy Plan. 2006 Mar;21(2):75-9
pubmed: 16415338
Lancet. 2016 Feb 20;387(10020):811-6
pubmed: 26299185
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Nov;86(11):871-6
pubmed: 19030693
Lancet. 2018 Dec 15;392(10164):2551
pubmed: 30563641
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Aug 30;2(3):e000400
pubmed: 29082020
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018 Jun 29;6(2):232-236
pubmed: 29903921
Lancet. 2018 Mar 17;391(10125):1108-1120
pubmed: 29179954
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Jun;88(6):402
pubmed: 20539847
Health Policy. 2018 May;122(5):457-472
pubmed: 29502893
Health Syst Reform. 2018;4(3):214-226
pubmed: 30081685
Salud Publica Mex. 2017 May-Jun;59(3):321-342
pubmed: 28902320
Health Econ Policy Law. 2017 Apr;12(2):125-137
pubmed: 28332456
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Jun 22;5(11):615-618
pubmed: 27801355

Auteurs

Elisabeth Paul (E)

Université libre de Bruxelles, Campus Erasme, Route de Lennik 808, CP 594, 1070, Bruxelles, Belgium. Elisabeth.Paul@ulb.ac.be.
University of Liège, Tax Institute, Quartier Agora, Bat. B3, 4000, Liège, Belgium. Elisabeth.Paul@ulb.ac.be.

N'koué Emmanuel Sambiéni (NE)

Faculty of Letters, Arts, and Human Sciences, University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin.

Jean-Pierre Wangbe (JP)

Lawyer, Auditor, Centre for Research and Study in Law and Judicial Institutions (CREDIJ), University of Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin.

Fabienne Fecher (F)

University of Liège, Tax Institute, Quartier Agora, Bat. B3, 4000, Liège, Belgium.

Marc Bourgeois (M)

University of Liège, Tax Institute, Quartier Agora, Bat. B3, 4000, Liège, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH