An Update on Maxillary Fractures: A Heterogenous Group.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
6
9
2020
medline:
12
1
2021
entrez:
5
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to review the different types of maxillary fractures and highlight their diagnostic and therapeutic differences. A retrospective chart review of patients who sustained maxillary fractures was conducted through the Einstein Healthcare Network during the years 2016-2017. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were used to categorize continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The cohort of patients (n = 141) were predominately African American (62%) and male (75%) with a mean age 45.3 years. The most common maxillary fracture was maxillary sinus (29%), followed by zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) (26%), frontal process (20%), dentoalveolar (16%), and LeFort (9%). Dentoalveolar fractures were mostly evaluated by the oral maxillofacial surgery service (74%), while ZMC and LeFort fractures were more commonly referred to an otolaryngologist (56% and 67%, respectively). Patients with dentoalveolar fractures were more likely to undergo wire splinting (61%). All patients with frontal process and maxillary sinus fractures were managed non-operatively. Most patients with ZMC fractures were managed non-operatively (78%) while the remainder underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) (22%). Patients with LeFort fractures more commonly underwent maxillomandibular fixation (MMF)/ORIF (83%). Dentoalveolar fractures were the most likely to be operated on the same day (93%) while ZMC and LeFort fractures were repaired within 1 week (88% and 100%, respectively). Maxillary trauma is very heterogenous in comparison to other maxillofacial trauma patterns. Each fracture type is treated uniquely and can involve one or more provider teams depending on the extent and severity of the injury, as well as hospital resources.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to review the different types of maxillary fractures and highlight their diagnostic and therapeutic differences.
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective chart review of patients who sustained maxillary fractures was conducted through the Einstein Healthcare Network during the years 2016-2017. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were used to categorize continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The cohort of patients (n = 141) were predominately African American (62%) and male (75%) with a mean age 45.3 years. The most common maxillary fracture was maxillary sinus (29%), followed by zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) (26%), frontal process (20%), dentoalveolar (16%), and LeFort (9%). Dentoalveolar fractures were mostly evaluated by the oral maxillofacial surgery service (74%), while ZMC and LeFort fractures were more commonly referred to an otolaryngologist (56% and 67%, respectively). Patients with dentoalveolar fractures were more likely to undergo wire splinting (61%). All patients with frontal process and maxillary sinus fractures were managed non-operatively. Most patients with ZMC fractures were managed non-operatively (78%) while the remainder underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) (22%). Patients with LeFort fractures more commonly underwent maxillomandibular fixation (MMF)/ORIF (83%). Dentoalveolar fractures were the most likely to be operated on the same day (93%) while ZMC and LeFort fractures were repaired within 1 week (88% and 100%, respectively).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Maxillary trauma is very heterogenous in comparison to other maxillofacial trauma patterns. Each fracture type is treated uniquely and can involve one or more provider teams depending on the extent and severity of the injury, as well as hospital resources.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32890151
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006675
pii: 00001665-202010000-00016
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1920-1924Références
Zaleckas L, Pečiulienė V, Gendvilienė I, et al. Prevalence and etiology of midfacial fractures: a study of 799 cases. Medicina (Kaunas) 2015; 51:222–227.
Kellman RM, Morehead JM. Midfacial Trauma. In: Resident Manual of Trauma to the Face, Head and Neck. Alexandria, VA: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation: 2012; 74–90
Kellman RM, Schmidt C. The paranasal sinuses as a protective crumple zone for the orbit. Laryngoscope 2009; 119:1682–1690.
Andreasen JO, Lauridsen E. Alveolar process fractures in the permanent dentition. Part 1. Etiology and clinical characteristics. A retrospective analysis of 299 cases involving 815 teeth. Dent Traumatol 2015; 31:442–447.
Ruslin M, Wolff J, Boffano P, et al. Dental trauma in association with maxillofacial fractures: an epidemiological study. Dent Traumatol 2015; 31:318–323.
Gautam S, Thapa A. Composite wire splint, an economical, maintainable and flexible option, in stabilizing luxated, avulsed and intruded teeth: a prospective study. Nepal Med Coll J 2016; 18:124–127.
Gupta M, Das D, Soodan K, et al. Dental injuries in patients associated with fracture of facial bones. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 23:63–69.
Yoshioka N, Tomita S, Nishikawa H, et al. Medial maxillary fractures revisited. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67:506–512.
Blatt S, Rahimi-Nedjat R, Sagheb K, et al. Coincidence of mandibular fractures with isolated posterior maxillary sinus fractures. Dent Traumatol 2017; 33:345–349.
Moss WJ, Kedarisetty S, Jafari A, et al. A review of hard palate fracture repair techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74:328–336.
Chandra L, Deepa D, Atri M, et al. A retrospective cross-sectional study of maxillofacial trauma in Delhi-NCR Region. J Family Med Prim Care 2019; 8:1453–1459.
Strong EB, Gary C. Management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2017; 25:547–562.
Louis M, Agrawal N, Kaufman M, et al. Midface Fractures I. Semin Plast Surg 2017; 31:85–93.
Regmi KP, Tu J, Ge S. Retrospective clinical study of maxillary sagittal fractures: predictors of postoperative outcome. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 75:576–583.
Soriano RM, M Das J. Anatomy, head and neck. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls, 2019.
Manson PN, Hoopes JE, Su CT. Structural pillars of the facial skeleton: an approach to the management of Le Fort fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66:54–61.
Stanley RB Jr, Nowak GM. Midfacial fractures: importance of angle of impact to horizontal craniofacial buttresses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93:186–192.
Louis M, Agrawal N, Truong TA. Midface Fractures II. Semin Plast Surg 2017; 31:94–99.
Chung KJ, Kim YH, Kim TG, et al. Treatment of complex facial fractures: clinical experience of different timing and order. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24:216–220.
Hanba C, Svider PF, Chen FS, et al. Race and sex differences in adult facial fracture risk. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18:441–448.
Bobian M, El-Kashlan N, Hanba CJ, et al. Traumatic facial injuries among elderly nursing home residents: never event or frequent occurrence? JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 143:569–573.
Lin S, Levin L, Goldman S, et al. Dento-alveolar and maxillofacial injuries - a retrospective study from a level 1 trauma center in Israel. Dent Traumatol 2007; 23:155–157.
Goldschmidt MJ, Castiglione CL, Assael LA, et al. Craniomaxillofacial trauma in the elderly. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 53:1145–1149.
U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/technical-documentation/table-and-geography-changes/2016/5-year.html. Accessed Janaury 27, 2020.
Hoeksema AR, Spoorenberg S, Peters LL, et al. Elderly with remaining teeth report less frailty and better quality of life than edentulous elderly: a cross-sectional study. Oral Dis 2017; 23:526–536.
Ballon A, Landes CA, Zeilhofer HF, et al. The importance of the primary reconstruction of the traumatized anterior maxillary sinus wall. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19:505–509.
Starch-Jensen T, Linnebjerg LB, Jensen JD. Treatment of zygomatic complex fractures with surgical or nonsurgical intervention: a retrospective study. Open Dent J 2018; 12:377–387. Published 2018 May 21.
Yang HC, Kim YY, Jin SM, et al. Transnasal endoscopic ultrasound-guided reduction of maxillary sinus wall fracture. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274:3383–3390.