Recurrence rate after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and laser Conization: A 5-year follow-up study.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cervix Uteri
/ pathology
Conization
/ instrumentation
Electrosurgery
/ instrumentation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lasers
Margins of Excision
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ epidemiology
Neoplasm, Residual
Papillomavirus Infections
/ epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Young Adult
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia
/ diagnosis
Cervical dysplasia
Conization
HPV
LEEP
Laser conization
Journal
Gynecologic oncology
ISSN: 1095-6859
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0365304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
30
07
2020
accepted:
21
08
2020
pubmed:
8
9
2020
medline:
17
4
2021
entrez:
7
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Conization aims to remove pre-neoplastic lesions of the uterine cervix. Several techniques for conization have been compared, but evidence regarding the most effective therapeutic option is scant. Here, we aimed to compare the recurrence rate following laser conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in patients with high-grade cervical dysplasia (HSIL/CIN2+). This is a retrospective multi-institutional study. Medical records of consecutive patients with HSIL/CIN2+ undergoing conization between 2010 and 2014 were retrieved. A propensity-score matching (PSM) was applied in order to reduce allocation bias. The risk of developing recurrence was estimated using Kaplan-Meir and Cox hazard models. Overall, 2966 patients had conization over the study period, including 567 (20%) and 2399 (80%) patients having laser conization and LEEP, respectively. Looking at predictors of recurrence, diagnosis of CIN3 (HR:3.80 (95%CI:2.01,7.21); p < 0.001) and HPV persistence (HR:1.81 (95%CI:1.11,2.96); p < 0.001) correlated with an increased risk of recurrence. After applying a PSM we selected 500 patients undergoing laser conization and 1000 undergoing LEEP. Patients undergoing LEEP were at higher risk of having positive surgical margins in comparison to patients undergoing laser conization (11.2% vs. 4.2%). The risk of having persistence of HPV was similar between the two groups (15.0% vs. 11.6%;p = 0.256). Five-year recurrence rate was 8.1% and 4% after LEEP and laser conization, respectively (p = 0.023). HPV persistence was the only factor associated with [5-]year recurrence after both laser conization (p = 0.003) and LEEP (p = 0.001). HPV persistence is the only factor associated with an increased risk of recurrence after either laser conization or LEEP. Owing to the lack of data regarding obstetrical outcomes, we are not able to assess the best therapeutic option for women with cervical dysplasia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32893030
pii: S0090-8258(20)33826-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.025
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
636-641Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.