Real-world patient-reported outcomes of women receiving initial endocrine-based therapy for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer in five European countries.


Journal

BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 25 11 2019
accepted: 11 08 2020
entrez: 7 9 2020
pubmed: 8 9 2020
medline: 20 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Endocrine therapy (ET)-based regimens are the mainstay of treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer. With the introduction of new treatment classes, it is important to examine patient symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at the start of this changing therapeutic landscape. This real-world study describes the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer receiving ET-based regimens who were naïve to systemic treatment in the advanced setting across five European countries (EU5). Data were collected between March and July 2017 from surveyed oncologists and their patients at a single time point using the multinational Adelphi Advanced Breast Cancer Disease Specific Programme™. Patients completed PRO questionnaires on HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30), pain severity and interference, and work and activity impairment. A multiple linear regression model explored factors associated with HRQoL. Across EU5, 226 physicians provided data on 781 women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer taking their first ET-based regimen for advanced disease, of whom 252 provided PRO data. This subset had a mean age of 67.1 years, 94% were postmenopausal, 89% were diagnosed with advanced breast cancer at initial presentation, 79% had stage IV disease (66% of these patients had bone metastases and 38% had visceral metastases, including 18% with liver metastases) and 77% were on endocrine-only therapy as their initial treatment for advanced disease. The mean EORTC QLQ-C30 global health score (50.9) was worse than the reference value for patients with advanced breast cancer (60.2). Fatigue, pain, and insomnia were the most severe symptoms, and mean functioning scores were also worse than reference values. "Worst pain" and "pain interference" were moderate/severe for 42 and 80% of patients. Mean activity impairment was 44%, and greater activity impairment was associated with poorer HRQoL. Despite receiving first-line ET-based regimens for advanced disease, these women had a poor HRQoL and high levels of symptoms, pain, pain interference and activity impairment. New treatments that maintain a stable disease state and reduce activity impairment may have a positive effect on the HRQoL of those living with advanced breast cancer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Endocrine therapy (ET)-based regimens are the mainstay of treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer. With the introduction of new treatment classes, it is important to examine patient symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at the start of this changing therapeutic landscape. This real-world study describes the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer receiving ET-based regimens who were naïve to systemic treatment in the advanced setting across five European countries (EU5).
METHODS METHODS
Data were collected between March and July 2017 from surveyed oncologists and their patients at a single time point using the multinational Adelphi Advanced Breast Cancer Disease Specific Programme™. Patients completed PRO questionnaires on HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30), pain severity and interference, and work and activity impairment. A multiple linear regression model explored factors associated with HRQoL.
RESULTS RESULTS
Across EU5, 226 physicians provided data on 781 women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer taking their first ET-based regimen for advanced disease, of whom 252 provided PRO data. This subset had a mean age of 67.1 years, 94% were postmenopausal, 89% were diagnosed with advanced breast cancer at initial presentation, 79% had stage IV disease (66% of these patients had bone metastases and 38% had visceral metastases, including 18% with liver metastases) and 77% were on endocrine-only therapy as their initial treatment for advanced disease. The mean EORTC QLQ-C30 global health score (50.9) was worse than the reference value for patients with advanced breast cancer (60.2). Fatigue, pain, and insomnia were the most severe symptoms, and mean functioning scores were also worse than reference values. "Worst pain" and "pain interference" were moderate/severe for 42 and 80% of patients. Mean activity impairment was 44%, and greater activity impairment was associated with poorer HRQoL.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Despite receiving first-line ET-based regimens for advanced disease, these women had a poor HRQoL and high levels of symptoms, pain, pain interference and activity impairment. New treatments that maintain a stable disease state and reduce activity impairment may have a positive effect on the HRQoL of those living with advanced breast cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32894087
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07294-2
pii: 10.1186/s12885-020-07294-2
pmc: PMC7487722
doi:

Substances chimiques

ERBB2 protein, human EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2 EC 2.7.10.1

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

855

Subventions

Organisme : Eli Lilly and Company
ID : N/A

Références

Pain. 2017 Jun;158(6):1108-1112
pubmed: 28267060
Breast. 2014 Dec;23(6):763-9
pubmed: 25193423
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
pubmed: 8433390
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Oct;14(10):2756-68
pubmed: 8874337
Ann Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;29(8):1634-1657
pubmed: 30032243
Onkologe (Berl). 2018;24(Suppl 2):91-98
pubmed: 30464373
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 27;7:45411
pubmed: 28345619
Breast Cancer. 2017 Jan;24(1):128-136
pubmed: 27002988
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):139-44
pubmed: 9440735
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017 Dec;72(12):758-763
pubmed: 29319722
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019 Jun 04;3(3):pkz037
pubmed: 32328553
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Oct;32(10):1709-17
pubmed: 27331272
Oncologist. 2020 Feb;25(2):e243-e251
pubmed: 32043763
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 25;8(17):27990-27996
pubmed: 28427196
Cancer. 2013 Feb 15;119(4):832-8
pubmed: 22951813
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Nov;24(11):3063-72
pubmed: 18826746
ESMO Open. 2017 Aug 22;2(3):e000227
pubmed: 29209529
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;103:356-387
pubmed: 30100160
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 21;9(2):e023568
pubmed: 30796119
Br J Cancer. 2013 Mar 19;108(5):1195-208
pubmed: 23449362
Acta Oncol. 2014 Jul;53(7):958-65
pubmed: 24456505
Breast J. 2013 May-Jun;19(3):285-92
pubmed: 23528206
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Dec;14(6):929-40
pubmed: 25130198
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jun;151(3):679-86
pubmed: 25981897
Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43
pubmed: 11491192
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Feb 7;3(1):10
pubmed: 30734110
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2015 Nov;7(6):304-20
pubmed: 26557899
Pain. 1995 May;61(2):277-84
pubmed: 7659438
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Oct;141(3):507-14
pubmed: 24104881
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):e294-e304
pubmed: 27396647
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:67-73
pubmed: 27249687
Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38
pubmed: 8080219
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2018 Dec 18;4:41
pubmed: 30588487
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Sep;19(9):e459-e469
pubmed: 30191850
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Aug;170(3):535-545
pubmed: 29654415
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 Jun 11;10:171-186
pubmed: 31354371
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Nov;4(5):353-65
pubmed: 10146874
J Bone Oncol. 2017 Nov 24;11:1-9
pubmed: 29892519
Oncol Ther. 2016;4(2):189-197
pubmed: 28261649
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016 Oct;76(10):1065-1073
pubmed: 27761027
Acta Oncol. 2018 May;57(5):622-628
pubmed: 29140139
Clin Ther. 2017 Aug;39(8):1719-1728
pubmed: 28751098
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;118:1-8
pubmed: 31639445
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jul;48(11):1713-21
pubmed: 22418017
Curr Oncol. 2018 Aug;25(4):e282-e290
pubmed: 30111973
Clin Ther. 2018 Apr;40(4):628-639.e3
pubmed: 29609880
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012 Sep;21(5):565-80
pubmed: 22672416
Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 Feb;63:144-155
pubmed: 29329006

Auteurs

Alison Davie (A)

Eli Lilly and Co Ltd, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6PH, UK. davie_alison@lilly.com.

Gebra Cuyun Carter (GC)

Eli Lilly and Co, Indianapolis, IN, 46204, USA.

Alex Rider (A)

Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 5JB, UK.

James Pike (J)

Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 5JB, UK.

Katie Lewis (K)

Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 5JB, UK.

Abigail Bailey (A)

Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 5JB, UK.

Gregory L Price (GL)

Eli Lilly and Co, Indianapolis, IN, 46204, USA.

Francois Ringeisen (F)

Eli Lilly SA, Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland.

Xavier Pivot (X)

Paul Strauss Cancer Center, Strasbourg, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH