Bacterial and viral co-infections in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia admitted to a French ICU.
Bacteria
COVID-19
Co-infection
Haemophilus influenzae
SARS-CoV-2
Staphylococcus aureus
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Journal
Annals of intensive care
ISSN: 2110-5820
Titre abrégé: Ann Intensive Care
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101562873
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Sep 2020
07 Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
28
05
2020
accepted:
30
08
2020
entrez:
7
9
2020
pubmed:
8
9
2020
medline:
8
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Data on the prevalence of bacterial and viral co-infections among patients admitted to the ICU for acute respiratory failure related to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia are lacking. We aimed to assess the rate of bacterial and viral co-infections, as well as to report the most common micro-organisms involved in patients admitted to the ICU for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. In this monocenter retrospective study, we reviewed all the respiratory microbiological investigations performed within the first 48 h of ICU admission of COVID-19 patients (RT-PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2) admitted for acute respiratory failure. From March 13th to April 16th 2020, a total of 92 adult patients (median age: 61 years, 1st-3rd quartiles [55-70]; males: n = 73/92, 79%; baseline SOFA: 4 [3-7] and SAPS II: 31 [21-40]; invasive mechanical ventilation: n = 83/92, 90%; ICU mortality: n = 45/92, 49%) were admitted to our 40-bed ICU for acute respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Among them, 26 (28%) were considered as co-infected with a pathogenic bacterium at ICU admission with no co-infection related to atypical bacteria or viruses. The distribution of the 32 bacteria isolated from culture and/or respiratory PCRs was as follows: methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (n = 10/32, 31%), Haemophilus influenzae (n = 7/32, 22%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 6/32, 19%), Enterobacteriaceae (n = 5/32, 16%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2/32, 6%), Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 1/32, 3%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 1/32, 3%). Among the 24 pathogenic bacteria isolated from culture, 2 (8%) and 5 (21%) were resistant to 3rd generation cephalosporin and to amoxicillin-clavulanate combination, respectively. We report on a 28% rate of bacterial co-infection at ICU admission of patients with severe SARSCoV-2 pneumonia, mostly related to Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Enterobacteriaceae. In French patients with confirmed severe SARSCoV-2 pneumonia requiring ICU admission, our results encourage the systematic administration of an empiric antibiotic monotherapy with a 3rd generation cephalosporin, with a prompt de-escalation as soon as possible. Further larger studies are needed to assess the real prevalence and the predictors of co-infection together with its prognostic impact on critically ill patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Data on the prevalence of bacterial and viral co-infections among patients admitted to the ICU for acute respiratory failure related to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia are lacking. We aimed to assess the rate of bacterial and viral co-infections, as well as to report the most common micro-organisms involved in patients admitted to the ICU for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
METHODS
In this monocenter retrospective study, we reviewed all the respiratory microbiological investigations performed within the first 48 h of ICU admission of COVID-19 patients (RT-PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2) admitted for acute respiratory failure.
RESULTS
RESULTS
From March 13th to April 16th 2020, a total of 92 adult patients (median age: 61 years, 1st-3rd quartiles [55-70]; males: n = 73/92, 79%; baseline SOFA: 4 [3-7] and SAPS II: 31 [21-40]; invasive mechanical ventilation: n = 83/92, 90%; ICU mortality: n = 45/92, 49%) were admitted to our 40-bed ICU for acute respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Among them, 26 (28%) were considered as co-infected with a pathogenic bacterium at ICU admission with no co-infection related to atypical bacteria or viruses. The distribution of the 32 bacteria isolated from culture and/or respiratory PCRs was as follows: methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (n = 10/32, 31%), Haemophilus influenzae (n = 7/32, 22%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 6/32, 19%), Enterobacteriaceae (n = 5/32, 16%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2/32, 6%), Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 1/32, 3%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 1/32, 3%). Among the 24 pathogenic bacteria isolated from culture, 2 (8%) and 5 (21%) were resistant to 3rd generation cephalosporin and to amoxicillin-clavulanate combination, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We report on a 28% rate of bacterial co-infection at ICU admission of patients with severe SARSCoV-2 pneumonia, mostly related to Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Enterobacteriaceae. In French patients with confirmed severe SARSCoV-2 pneumonia requiring ICU admission, our results encourage the systematic administration of an empiric antibiotic monotherapy with a 3rd generation cephalosporin, with a prompt de-escalation as soon as possible. Further larger studies are needed to assess the real prevalence and the predictors of co-infection together with its prognostic impact on critically ill patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32894364
doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00736-x
pii: 10.1186/s13613-020-00736-x
pmc: PMC7475952
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
119Références
JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1574-1581
pubmed: 32250385
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720
pubmed: 32109013
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
Lancet. 2020 May 16;395(10236):1569-1578
pubmed: 32423584
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 May 02;:
pubmed: 32358954
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 May 1;72(5):1272-1274
pubmed: 28160473
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;5(9):1067-1069
pubmed: 32936266
Eur Radiol. 2020 Aug;30(8):4381-4389
pubmed: 32193638
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2085-2086
pubmed: 32293646
JAMA. 2013 Jan 16;309(3):275-82
pubmed: 23321766
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):851-853
pubmed: 32123993
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2012-2022
pubmed: 32227758
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun 1;201(11):1430-1434
pubmed: 32267160
Lancet Microbe. 2020 May;1(1):e11
pubmed: 32835323
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):854-887
pubmed: 32222812
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1061-1069
pubmed: 32031570
Intensive Care Med. 2011 May;37(5):796-800
pubmed: 21369807
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 01;:
pubmed: 32604413
JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1612-1614
pubmed: 32191259
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Jul;26(7):808-810
pubmed: 32360446
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):e45-e67
pubmed: 31573350
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
Crit Care Med. 2012 May;40(5):1487-98
pubmed: 22511131
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Dec;53(12):3784-7
pubmed: 26378282
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):507-513
pubmed: 32007143
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;5(9):1036-1041
pubmed: 32936252
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):475-481
pubmed: 32105632