Detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 by droplet digital PCR in real-time PCR negative nasopharyngeal swabs from suspected COVID-19 patients.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Betacoronavirus
/ genetics
COVID-19
Coronavirus Infections
/ diagnosis
Female
Humans
Limit of Detection
Male
Middle Aged
Nasopharynx
/ virology
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral
/ diagnosis
RNA, Viral
/ analysis
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
/ methods
SARS-CoV-2
Severity of Illness Index
Viral Load
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
17
05
2020
accepted:
04
07
2020
entrez:
8
9
2020
pubmed:
9
9
2020
medline:
17
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Since SARS-CoV-2-based disease (COVID-19) spreads as a pandemic, the necessity of a highly sensitive molecular diagnosis that can drastically reduce false negatives reverse transcription PCR (rtPCR) results, raises as a major clinical need. Here we evaluated the performance of a ddPCR-based assay to quantify SARS-CoV-2 titer in 55 suspected COVID-19 cases with negative rtPCR results thanks to in-house ddPCR assay (targeting RdRp and host RNaseP). Samples were collected at ASST-GOM Niguarda between February and May 2020 at hospital admission. Clinical and imaging data were obtained for clinical staging and definition of disease severity. Patients were mainly female (45.5%) with a median age of 73 (57-84) years. ddPCR-based assay detected SARS-CoV-2 genome in nasopharyngeal samples of 19 (34.5%) patients (median viral-load: 128 copies/mL, IQR: 72-345). In 15 of them (78.9%), chest CT showed a classical COVID-19 bilateral interstitial pneumonia; 14 patients (73.7%) showed severe COVID-19 manifestations. ddPCR did not identify any trace of SARS-CoV-2 genome in the respiratory samples of the remaining 36 patients. The serological assay performed in a subgroup of 34 patients at the later stage of illness (from 3 days to 90 days after) confirmed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in all patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in ddPCR (100%). Contrariwise, negative tests were observed in 95.0% ddPCR negative patients (P<0.001). Thanks to a ddPCR-based assay, we achieved a rapid and accurate SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in rtPCR-negative respiratory samples of individuals with COVID-19 suspect, allowing the rapid taking care and correct management of these patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32898153
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236311
pii: PONE-D-20-14709
pmc: PMC7478621
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Viral
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0236311Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Aug;52(8):2844-8
pubmed: 24871214
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):793-798
pubmed: 32221523
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8):
pubmed: 32381641
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;20(4):411-412
pubmed: 32105638
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e55943
pubmed: 23573183
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):582-585
pubmed: 32172669
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 May;115(5):790
pubmed: 32205644
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Apr 23;58(5):
pubmed: 32102856
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 Aug 11;7:369
pubmed: 28848722
Biotechnol Lett. 2015 Oct;37(10):2063-73
pubmed: 26187315
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):1259-1268
pubmed: 32438868
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 19;382(12):1177-1179
pubmed: 32074444
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 28;:
pubmed: 32221519
J Clin Virol. 2019 Aug;117:61-67
pubmed: 31229934
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):1003-5
pubmed: 23995387
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Apr;21(4):505-508
pubmed: 32174053