Diffusion tensor imaging in renal artery stenosis: a preliminary report.
Adult
Aged
Analysis of Variance
Anisotropy
Case-Control Studies
Diffusion Tensor Imaging
/ methods
Female
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
Kidney Cortex
/ blood supply
Kidney Medulla
/ blood supply
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Renal Artery Obstruction
/ diagnostic imaging
Statistics, Nonparametric
Journal
The British journal of radiology
ISSN: 1748-880X
Titre abrégé: Br J Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Nov 2020
01 Nov 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
10
9
2020
medline:
30
10
2020
entrez:
9
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the diffusion properties in the kidneys affected by renal artery stenosis (RAS) using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). In this prospective study, 35 patients with RAS and 15 patients without renal abnormalities were enrolled and examined using DTI. Cortical and medullary regions of interest (ROIs) were located to obtain the corresponding values of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA). The cortical and medullary ADC and FA were compared in the kidney affected by variable degrees of stenosis (RAS 50-75% and >75%) For the controls, the ADC value was significantly ( The alterations of the diffusional parameters caused by RAS can be detected by DTI and could be useful in the diagnostic evaluation of these patients. 1. Magnetic resonance DTI could provide useful information about renal involvement in RAS.2. Magnetic resonance DTI allows non-invasive repeatable evaluation of the renal parenchyma, without contrast media.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32903036
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200101
pmc: PMC8519640
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20200101Références
Eur Radiol. 2015 Mar;25(3):652-60
pubmed: 25304821
Invest Radiol. 2010 May;45(5):245-54
pubmed: 20375845
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Mar 16;130(6):461-70
pubmed: 10075613
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Sep;36(3):443-51
pubmed: 12218965
Eur Radiol. 2013 Jun;23(6):1678-85
pubmed: 23300038
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(6):737-41
pubmed: 17579525
Am J Nephrol. 2011;34(5):476-82
pubmed: 22024476
Eur Radiol. 2014 Dec;24(12):3042-50
pubmed: 25059677
Invest Radiol. 2008 Oct;43(10):677-85
pubmed: 18791409
Radiology. 2005 Jun;235(3):911-7
pubmed: 15845792
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Jun;9(6):832-7
pubmed: 10373031
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2014 May 13;7:169-81
pubmed: 24868169
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Jan;65(1):148-53
pubmed: 17537606
Eur Radiol. 2010 Jun;20(6):1374-83
pubmed: 20013274
Magn Reson Med. 2015 Apr;73(4):1526-32
pubmed: 24752998
Am Heart J. 1998 Nov;136(5):913-8
pubmed: 9812088
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Mar;29(3):736-44
pubmed: 19243070
Eur Radiol. 2015 Jan;25(1):92-8
pubmed: 25038861
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jan;37(1):233-6
pubmed: 22807237
Eur Radiol. 2011 Nov;21(11):2427-33
pubmed: 21710264
Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Sep;29(7):1030-3
pubmed: 21616621
NMR Biomed. 2010 Jun;23(5):496-502
pubmed: 20175152
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Aug;15(8):1974-82
pubmed: 15284283
Radiology. 1994 Dec;193(3):711-5
pubmed: 7972811
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2014 Feb 20;7:89-99
pubmed: 24600242