Mindfulness-Based Restoration Skills Training (ReST) in a Natural Setting Compared to Conventional Mindfulness Training: Psychological Functioning After a Five-Week Course.
environment
meditation
mindfulness
nature
psychological functioning
restoration
training
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
27
02
2020
accepted:
10
06
2020
entrez:
9
9
2020
pubmed:
10
9
2020
medline:
10
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Restoration skills training (ReST) is a mindfulness-based course that draws on restorative nature experience to facilitate the meditation practice and teach widely applicable adaptation skills. Previous studies comparing ReST to conventional mindfulness training (CMT) showed that ReST has important advantages: it supports beginning meditators in connecting with restorative environmental qualities and in meditating with less effort; it restores their attention regulation capabilities; and it helps them complete the course and establish a regular meditation habit. However, mindfulness theory indicates that effortful training may be necessary to achieve generalized improvements in psychological functioning. Therefore, this study tests whether the less effortful and more acceptable ReST approach is attended by any meaningful disadvantage compared to CMT in terms of its effects on central aspects psychological functioning. We analyze data from four rounds of development of the ReST course, in each of which we compared it to a parallel and formally matched CMT course. Randomly assigned participants (total course starters = 152) provided ratings of dispositional mindfulness, cognitive functioning, and chronic stress before and after the 5-week ReST and CMT courses. Round 4 also included a separately recruited passive control condition. ReST and CMT were attended by similar average improvements in the three outcomes, although the effects on chronic stress were inconsistent. Moderate to large improvements in the three outcomes could also be affirmed in contrasts with the passive controls. Using a reliable change index, we saw that over one third of the ReST and CMT participants enjoyed reliably improved psychological functioning. The risk of experiencing deteriorated functioning was no greater with either ReST or CMT than for passive control group participants. None of the contrasts exceeded our stringent criterion for inferiority of ReST compared with CMT. We conclude that ReST is a promising alternative for otherwise healthy people with stress or concentration problems who would be less likely to complete more effortful CMT. By adapting the meditation practices to draw on restorative setting characteristics, ReST can mitigate the demands otherwise incurred in early stages of mindfulness training without compromising the acquisition of widely applicable mindfulness skills.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32903687
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01560
pmc: PMC7438830
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1560Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Lymeus, Ahrling, Apelman, Florin, Nilsson, Vincenti, Zetterberg, Lindberg and Hartig.
Références
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):102-9
pubmed: 18177782
Mindfulness (N Y). 2010 Mar;1(1):10-20
pubmed: 21125023
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Apr;12(4):163-9
pubmed: 18329323
Am Psychol. 2002 Dec;57(12):1052-9
pubmed: 12617064
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Nov;30(7):865-78
pubmed: 21151705
BMJ. 2011 Feb 07;342:d40
pubmed: 21300711
Cogn Behav Ther. 2011;40(4):291-303
pubmed: 21770845
Am Psychol. 1996 Oct;51(10):1059-64
pubmed: 8870542
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1655-60
pubmed: 18994663
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 May;62(5):e9
pubmed: 18431834
J Psychosom Res. 2008 Apr;64(4):405-8
pubmed: 18374739
J Behav Med. 1998 Dec;21(6):581-99
pubmed: 9891256
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Jan;5(1):43-57
pubmed: 26162062
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 15;13(2):e0192429
pubmed: 29447184
Assessment. 2020 Jul;27(5):982-995
pubmed: 29993260
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Jun;43:48-73
pubmed: 24705269
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Jul;71:101-114
pubmed: 30638824
Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Jul;2(3):109-12
pubmed: 21897887
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2018;21(4):227-268
pubmed: 30130463
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2016;19(7):305-343
pubmed: 27668460
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Feb;59(1):12-9
pubmed: 2002127
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Jan;13(1):36-61
pubmed: 29016274
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 May;13(5):222-7
pubmed: 19375975
Br J Clin Psychol. 1982 Feb;21(1):1-16
pubmed: 7126941
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:207-28
pubmed: 24387090
Front Neurosci. 2013 Feb 04;7:8
pubmed: 23382709
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 04;10:722
pubmed: 31019479
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 13;9(1):7730
pubmed: 31197192
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 23;104(43):17152-6
pubmed: 17940025
Am Psychol. 2015 Oct;70(7):632-58
pubmed: 26436313
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998 Feb;66(1):7-18
pubmed: 9489259
J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96
pubmed: 6668417
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Feb;40:116-30
pubmed: 26784917
J Clin Psychol. 2009 Jun;65(6):627-38
pubmed: 19309694
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Feb;68:57-72
pubmed: 30658238
Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2000;1(1):19-21
pubmed: 11714400
Assessment. 2006 Mar;13(1):27-45
pubmed: 16443717
Am Psychol. 2015 Oct;70(7):581-92
pubmed: 26436310
BMJ. 2001 Nov 10;323(7321):1123-4
pubmed: 11701584
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Mar;59:40-56
pubmed: 29438869
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88
pubmed: 28126032
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 Apr;16(4):213-25
pubmed: 25783612
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Apr;63:29-42
pubmed: 26835660
Mindfulness (N Y). 2018;9(3):980-992
pubmed: 29875884
J Atten Disord. 2008 May;11(6):737-46
pubmed: 18025249
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 12;8:1573
pubmed: 28959225
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 Aug;28(6):998-1009
pubmed: 16822738
Psychol Bull. 2012 Nov;138(6):1139-71
pubmed: 22582738
J Psychosom Res. 2016 May;84:22-30
pubmed: 27095155
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004 Mar;19(2):203-14
pubmed: 15010086
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):750-60
pubmed: 21782031
J Pers Assess. 2004 Feb;82(1):50-9
pubmed: 14979834
Science. 2016 May 20;352(6288):938-40
pubmed: 27199417
Trials. 2011 May 03;12:106
pubmed: 21539749
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Jun;65:208-28
pubmed: 27032724
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Jul;60(7):587-92
pubmed: 16790830
Neuropsychol Rev. 1991 Jun;2(2):109-45
pubmed: 1844706
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Apr;31(3):449-64
pubmed: 21183265
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1-32
pubmed: 18509902
Front Psychol. 2014 Apr 29;5:341
pubmed: 24808870