Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire.
Mild traumatic brain injury
Motor vehicle collision
Pain
Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire
Quantitative sensory testing
Journal
Pain reports
ISSN: 2471-2531
Titre abrégé: Pain Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101683899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
10
09
2019
revised:
03
04
2020
accepted:
04
04
2020
entrez:
9
9
2020
pubmed:
10
9
2020
medline:
10
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Chronic pain is a common postcollision consequence. Wherein, a clearer understanding of acute pain can help stem the acute-to-chronic pain transition. However, the variability of acute pain is only partially explained by psychophysical pain characteristics as measured by quantitative sensory testing. The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) may reflect inherent psychocognitive representations of patient's sensitivity and thus may reveal less-explored pain dimensions. In the vein of the biopsychosocial approach, this study aimed to explore whether PSQ holds additive value in explaining head and neck pain reports in very early acute-stage mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) after collision, above the use of psychophysical assessment. Study cohort (n = 130) consisted of mTBI patients (age range 19-66, 57 F) after accident with area-of-injury pain of at least 20 on the day of testing (mean pain 58.4 ± 21.6, range 20-100 Numerical Pain Scale) who underwent clinical, psychophysical, and pain-related psychological assessment within 72-hour after injury. Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire scores were significantly correlated with acute clinical, psychophysical, and pain-related psychological measures. Regression model ( Appraisal of cognitive daily-pain representations, by way of memory and imagination, provides an additional important dispositional facet to explain the variability in the acute mTBI postcollision clinical pain experience, above assessing nociceptive responsiveness to experimentally induced pain.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32903910
doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000821
pii: PAINREPORTS-D-19-0119
pmc: PMC7447377
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e821Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. This work was supported by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs under award W81XWH-15-1-0603. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Defense. Previous presentation: Part of this work was presented as a poster entitled Additive Utility of Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire in Explaining Very Early Acute mTBI Post-Motor Vehicle Collision Clinical Head Pain Variability at EFIC-Pain in Europe, XI, 2019.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Références
Pain. 2015 Feb;156(2):260-72
pubmed: 25599447
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Apr;54(4):541-57
pubmed: 3367279
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;113(1):148-56
pubmed: 24713310
Pain. 2014 Apr;155(4):663-5
pubmed: 24269491
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Aug;205(1):1-12
pubmed: 20607220
Pain. 2009 Nov;146(1-2):65-74
pubmed: 19665301
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Jun;22(3):425-30
pubmed: 19352173
Cereb Cortex. 2007 May;17(5):1139-46
pubmed: 16855007
Pain. 2006 Sep;124(1-2):18-26
pubmed: 16644133
J Pain. 2018 Aug;19(8):819-836
pubmed: 29454976
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Aug;63(4):417-26
pubmed: 18727769
J Pain. 2012 Oct;13(10):936-44
pubmed: 22981090
Phys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):700-11
pubmed: 21451097
Clin J Pain. 2001 Mar;17(1):65-71
pubmed: 11289090
Eur J Pain. 2015 Jul;19(6):805-6
pubmed: 25330039
J Pain. 2018 Dec;19(12):1424-1434
pubmed: 30017960
J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96
pubmed: 6668417
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1637-40
pubmed: 21044706
Clin J Pain. 2005 Sep-Oct;21(5):439-45
pubmed: 16093750
Pain. 2012 Jun;153(6):1210-8
pubmed: 22541722
Reg Anesth. 1989 Sep-Oct;14(5):208-11
pubmed: 2486645
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013 Sep;17(9):361
pubmed: 23943407
Pain Pract. 2005 Jun;5(2):85-94
pubmed: 17177754
Clin J Pain. 2001 Mar;17(1):52-64
pubmed: 11289089
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Aug;36:61-67
pubmed: 29751194
Neurology. 2005 Aug 9;65(3):437-43
pubmed: 16087910
Anesthesiology. 2011 Feb;114(2):445-57
pubmed: 21245740
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2013 Oct 29;4(4):e0024
pubmed: 24228167
Neurology. 2018 Sep 4;91(10):e931-e938
pubmed: 30068635
Pain Rep. 2019 Mar 08;4(2):e725
pubmed: 31041424
Rheumatol Int. 2015 Jun;35(6):1005-13
pubmed: 25510290
Clin J Pain. 2017 Jul;33(7):579-587
pubmed: 27648588
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):508-14
pubmed: 24141873
Pain. 2008 May;136(1-2):142-9
pubmed: 17720319
Anesthesiology. 2003 Jun;98(6):1422-6
pubmed: 12766652
Clin J Pain. 2017 Jan;33(1):57-66
pubmed: 27922844
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Oct-Nov;45-46:157-67
pubmed: 26254166
Occup Med (Lond). 2014 Jul;64(5):393-4
pubmed: 25005549
Pain Pract. 2014 Nov;14(8):745-51
pubmed: 24131768