Dataset of active avoidance in Wistar-Kyoto and Sprague Dawley rats: Experimental data and reinforcement learning model code and output.
Avoidance learning
Computational biology
Computational modelling
Neurosciences
Reinforcement learning
Strain differences
Wistar Kyoto rat
Journal
Data in brief
ISSN: 2352-3409
Titre abrégé: Data Brief
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101654995
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
03
07
2020
revised:
18
07
2020
accepted:
20
07
2020
entrez:
9
9
2020
pubmed:
10
9
2020
medline:
10
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Data were collected from 40 Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) and 40 Sprague Dawley (SD) rats during an active escape-avoidance experiment. Footshock could be avoided by pressing a lever during a danger period prior to onset of shock. If avoidance did not occur, a series of footshocks was administered, and the rat could press a lever to escape (terminate shocks). For each animal, data were simplified to the presence or absence of lever press and stimuli in each 12-second time frame. Using the pre-processed dataset, a reinforcement learning (RL) model, based on an actor-critic architecture, was utilized to estimate several different model parameters that best characterized each rat's behaviour during the experiment. Once individual model parameters were determined for all 80 rats, behavioural recovery simulations were run using the RL model with each animal's "best-fit" parameters; the simulated behaviour generated avoidance data (percent of trials avoided during a given experimental session) that could be compared across simulated rats, as is customarily done with empirical data. The datasets representing both the experimental data and the model-generated data can be interpreted in various ways to gain further insight into rat behaviour during avoidance and escape learning. Furthermore, the estimated parameters for each individual rat can be compared across groups. Thus, possible between-strain differences in model parameters can be detected, which might provide insights into strain differences in learning. The software implementing the RL model can also be applied to or serve as a template for other experiments involving acquisition learning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32904157
doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106074
pii: S2352-3409(20)30968-9
pii: 106074
pmc: PMC7451822
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
106074Subventions
Organisme : BLRD VA
ID : I01 BX000132
Pays : United States
Organisme : BLRD VA
ID : I01 BX004561
Pays : United States
Organisme : CSRD VA
ID : I01 CX001826
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships which have, or could be perceived to have, influenced the work reported in this article.
Références
Neuron. 2002 Oct 10;36(2):285-98
pubmed: 12383782
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Jan 1;356:78-88
pubmed: 30063948
Behav Brain Res. 2020 Sep 1;393:112784
pubmed: 32585299