German bronchoscopy unit readiness for the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide survey.


Journal

ERJ open research
ISSN: 2312-0541
Titre abrégé: ERJ Open Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101671641

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Historique:
received: 18 06 2020
accepted: 22 06 2020
entrez: 9 9 2020
pubmed: 10 9 2020
medline: 10 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The worldwide impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is unprecedented. Among the aerosol generating procedures, bronchoscopy in particular is an indispensable diagnostic and therapeutic tool that comes with a high risk of infection. Therefore, national societies have issued guidance statements. However, the individual ability of bronchoscopy units to follow these recommendations is largely unknown. We conducted a nationwide survey from 1 April 2020 to 7 April 2020 to which 218 German endoscopy units, 105 solely bronchoscopy and 113 interdisciplinary, responded. The survey was distributed electronically While 17% of units did not cancel any interventions, 16% cancelled >80% of their interventions. 73% were unable to completely separate high-risk patients. Most procedural measures, such as risk stratification in patients (95%), training to handle COVID-19 patients and personal protective equipment (PPE) (91%), risk adapted use of PPE (85%) and self-monitoring for staff (84%) were adopted well. Unit managers expected shortages in PPE (74%), staff shortages (68%) and severe financial losses (63%). In the short-term, PPE shortages are perceived to be the most imminent threat to bronchoscopic activity as a whole. In this era of uncertainty, sound evidence to guide bronchoscopy units and an international concerted effort are urgently needed to formulate recommendations on facts and adapted to local conditions as described in this study.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The worldwide impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is unprecedented. Among the aerosol generating procedures, bronchoscopy in particular is an indispensable diagnostic and therapeutic tool that comes with a high risk of infection. Therefore, national societies have issued guidance statements. However, the individual ability of bronchoscopy units to follow these recommendations is largely unknown.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a nationwide survey from 1 April 2020 to 7 April 2020 to which 218 German endoscopy units, 105 solely bronchoscopy and 113 interdisciplinary, responded. The survey was distributed electronically
RESULTS RESULTS
While 17% of units did not cancel any interventions, 16% cancelled >80% of their interventions. 73% were unable to completely separate high-risk patients. Most procedural measures, such as risk stratification in patients (95%), training to handle COVID-19 patients and personal protective equipment (PPE) (91%), risk adapted use of PPE (85%) and self-monitoring for staff (84%) were adopted well. Unit managers expected shortages in PPE (74%), staff shortages (68%) and severe financial losses (63%).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In the short-term, PPE shortages are perceived to be the most imminent threat to bronchoscopic activity as a whole. In this era of uncertainty, sound evidence to guide bronchoscopy units and an international concerted effort are urgently needed to formulate recommendations on facts and adapted to local conditions as described in this study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32904638
doi: 10.1183/23120541.00396-2020
pii: 00396-2020
pmc: PMC7456647
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Informations de copyright

Copyright ©ERS 2020.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest: C.S. Heidemann has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Garbe has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Damm has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Walter has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Michl has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Rosendahl has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: K. Darwiche has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Eisenmann has nothing to disclose.

Références

Gastroenterology. 2020 Aug;159(2):778-780.e3
pubmed: 32371115
Pneumologie. 2020 May;74(5):260-262
pubmed: 32289832
Respirology. 2020 Jun;25(6):574-577
pubmed: 32277733
Eur J Radiol. 2020 May;126:108961
pubmed: 32229322
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):672-675
pubmed: 32296168
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 08;43(0):E006
pubmed: 32033514
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E32-E40
pubmed: 32101510
Chest. 2020 Sep;158(3):1268-1281
pubmed: 32361152
Endoscopy. 2020 Jun;52(6):483-490
pubmed: 32303090

Auteurs

Clara S Heidemann (CS)

Dept of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany.
These authors contributed equally.

Jakob Garbe (J)

Dept of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany.
These authors contributed equally.

Marko Damm (M)

Dept of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany.

Steffen Walter (S)

Dept of Medical Psychology, Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, Germany.

Patrick Michl (P)

Dept of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany.

Jonas Rosendahl (J)

Dept of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany.

Kaid Darwiche (K)

West German Lung Center, Ruhrlandklinik, University Essen-Duisburg, Essen, Germany.
German Respiratory Society (DGP), Berlin, Germany.
These authors contributed equally.

Stephan Eisenmann (S)

Dept of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany.
These authors contributed equally.

Classifications MeSH