Diagnosing nasal obstruction and its common causes using the nasal acoustic device: A pilot study.

allergic rhinitis chronic rhinosinusitis deviated nasal septum nasal inspiratory peak flow nasal obstruction

Journal

Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology
ISSN: 2378-8038
Titre abrégé: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101684963

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 23 04 2020
revised: 06 07 2020
accepted: 25 07 2020
pubmed: 10 9 2020
medline: 10 9 2020
entrez: 9 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There is a need to develop a medical device which can accurately measure normal and abnormal nasal breathing which the patient can better understand in addition to being able to diagnose the cause for their nasal obstruction.The aim is to evaluate the accuracy of the nasal acoustic device (NAD) in diagnosing the common causes for nasal obstruction and diagnosing normal and abnormal (nasal obstruction) nasal breathing. This pilot study recruited 27 patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), and a deviated nasal septum (DNS) which represents the common causes for NO and 26 controls (with normal nasal breathing). Nasal breathing sounds were recorded by the NAD akin to two small stethoscopes placed over the left and right nasal ala. The novel outcome metrics for the NAD include inspiratory nasal acoustic score (INA) score, expiratory nasal acoustic (ENA) score and the inspiratory nasal obstruction balance index (NOBI). The change in acoustic score following decongestant is key in this diagnostic process. Pre-decongestant ENA score was used to detect the presence of nasal obstruction in patients compared to controls, with a sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.66-0.96) and a specificity of 0.77 (0.54-1.00). Post-decongestant percentage change in INA score was used to identify the presence of AR or CRS, with a sensitivity of 0.87 (0.69-1.00) and specificity of 0.72 (0.55-0.89) for AR; and a sensitivity of 0.92 (0.75-1.00) and specificity of 0.69 (0.52-0.86) for CRS. Post-decongestant inspiratory NOBI was used to identify DNS, with a sensitivity of 0.77 (0.59-0.95) and specificity of 0.94 (0.82-1.00). We have demonstrated that the NAD can help distinguish between normal and abnormal nasal breathing and help diagnose AR, CRS, and DNS. Such a device has not been invented and could revolutionize COVID-19 recovery telemedicine. Diagnostic accuracy study-Level III.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32904889
doi: 10.1002/lio2.445
pii: LIO2445
pmc: PMC7461538
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

796-806

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of The Triological Society.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None to declare.

Auteurs

Chia-Hung Li (CH)

Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering University College London London UK.

Anika Kaura (A)

Department of Rhinology and Facial Plastic Surgery Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital London UK.
UCL Ear Institute, University College London London UK.

Calvin Tan (C)

Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering University College London London UK.
UCL Medical School, Faculty of Medical Sciences University College London London UK.

Katherine L Whitcroft (KL)

Department of Rhinology and Facial Plastic Surgery Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital London UK.
UCL Ear Institute, University College London London UK.

Terence S Leung (TS)

Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering University College London London UK.

Peter Andrews (P)

Department of Rhinology and Facial Plastic Surgery Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital London UK.
UCL Ear Institute, University College London London UK.

Classifications MeSH