Access to Pain Care From Compensation Clinics: A Relational Coordination Perspective.
Journal
Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS
ISSN: 1078-4497
Titre abrégé: Fed Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9500574
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
entrez:
10
9
2020
pubmed:
11
9
2020
medline:
11
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Compensation and Pension (C&P) determination process is a potential gateway to accessing pain treatment in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). However, attitudes about C&P as a gateway and about collaboration with C&P clinics among VHA staff are unknown. In preparation for an initiative to link veterans seeking compensation for musculoskeletal disorders to treatment, clinical and administrative staff from the 8 VHA medical centers in New England were invited to complete a relational coordination survey that examined how different workgroups collaborate (communication and relationships) to provide pain care to veterans. A subset of those staff also participated in a semistructured interview about pain treatment referral practices within their medical centers. VHA staff were from primary care, administration, pain management, and C&P teams. Eighty-three VHA staff were invited to complete the relational coordination survey; 66 completed the survey and 39 participated in the semistructured interview. Most C&P staff interviewed thought of the compensation examination as a forensic process and that C&P-based efforts to engage veterans might interfere with the examination or were not their responsibility. However, some examiners described their efforts to determine new veterans' eligibility for VHA care and to connect them to specific treatments. VHA staff reported that there was little communication between the C&P team and other teams. The survey results supported this finding. The C&P group's relational coordination composite scores were lower than any other workgroup. Outreach to veterans at New England C&P clinics was inconsistent, and C&P teams rated low on a measure of coordination with workgroups involved in pain treatment. Compensation examinations appear to be underused opportunities to help veterans access treatment. C&P-based treatment engagement is feasible; it is being done by some Compensation teams.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Compensation and Pension (C&P) determination process is a potential gateway to accessing pain treatment in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). However, attitudes about C&P as a gateway and about collaboration with C&P clinics among VHA staff are unknown.
METHODS
METHODS
In preparation for an initiative to link veterans seeking compensation for musculoskeletal disorders to treatment, clinical and administrative staff from the 8 VHA medical centers in New England were invited to complete a relational coordination survey that examined how different workgroups collaborate (communication and relationships) to provide pain care to veterans. A subset of those staff also participated in a semistructured interview about pain treatment referral practices within their medical centers. VHA staff were from primary care, administration, pain management, and C&P teams.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eighty-three VHA staff were invited to complete the relational coordination survey; 66 completed the survey and 39 participated in the semistructured interview. Most C&P staff interviewed thought of the compensation examination as a forensic process and that C&P-based efforts to engage veterans might interfere with the examination or were not their responsibility. However, some examiners described their efforts to determine new veterans' eligibility for VHA care and to connect them to specific treatments. VHA staff reported that there was little communication between the C&P team and other teams. The survey results supported this finding. The C&P group's relational coordination composite scores were lower than any other workgroup.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Outreach to veterans at New England C&P clinics was inconsistent, and C&P teams rated low on a measure of coordination with workgroups involved in pain treatment. Compensation examinations appear to be underused opportunities to help veterans access treatment. C&P-based treatment engagement is feasible; it is being done by some Compensation teams.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
336-342Subventions
Organisme : NCCIH NIH HHS
ID : UH3 AT009758
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Author disclosures The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.
Références
J Interprof Care. 2019 Sep-Oct;33(5):481-489
pubmed: 30596306
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Apr;70(4):791-9
pubmed: 23980594
Psychol Bull. 1988 Mar;103(2):193-210
pubmed: 3283814
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(5):xv-xxii
pubmed: 20803385
Pain Med. 2019 Mar 1;20(3):528-542
pubmed: 29800338
Med Care. 2015 Apr;53(4):e16-30
pubmed: 24189550
Health Care Manage Rev. 2012 Oct-Dec;37(4):301-9
pubmed: 22138737
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015 Aug;31(4):205-12
pubmed: 25617081
Mil Med. 2005 Oct;170(10):867-70
pubmed: 16435761
J Nurs Adm. 2018 Mar;48(3):132-140
pubmed: 29389801
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):150-153
pubmed: 30291603
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Apr 1;68(4):396-399
pubmed: 27629795
Med Care. 2017 Jul;55 Suppl 7 Suppl 1:S71-S75
pubmed: 28146037
Health Care Manage Rev. 2020 Jan/Mar;45(1):12-20
pubmed: 29303904
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Dec 1;65(12):1426-32
pubmed: 25082304