Assessment of Intratumoral and Peritumoral Computed Tomography Radiomics for Predicting Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2020
01 09 2020
Historique:
entrez:
10
9
2020
pubmed:
11
9
2020
medline:
9
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, neoadjuvant chemoradiation has been shown to improve long-term outcomes, but the treatment response varies among patients. Accurate pretreatment prediction of response remains an urgent need. To determine whether peritumoral radiomics features derived from baseline computed tomography images could provide valuable information about neoadjuvant chemoradiation response and enhance the ability of intratumoral radiomics to estimate pathological complete response. A total of 231 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, who underwent baseline contrast-enhanced computed tomography and received neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery at 2 institutions in China, were consecutively included. This diagnostic study used single-institution data between April 2007 and December 2018 to extract radiomics features from intratumoral and peritumoral regions and established intratumoral, peritumoral, and combined radiomics models using different classifiers. External validation was conducted using independent data collected from another hospital during the same period. Radiogenomics analysis using gene expression profile was done in a subgroup of the training set for pathophysiological explanation. Data were analyzed from June to December 2019. Computed tomography-based radiomics. The discriminative performances of radiomics models were measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Among the 231 patients included (192 men [83.1%]; mean [SD] age, 59.8 [8.7] years), the optimal intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics models yielded similar areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.730 (95% CI, 0.609-0.850) and 0.734 (0.613-0.854), respectively. The combined model was composed of 7 intratumoral and 6 peritumoral features and achieved better discriminative performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.852 (95% CI, 0.753-0.951), accuracy of 84.3%, sensitivity of 90.3%, and specificity of 79.5% in the test set. Gene sets associated with the combined model mainly involved lymphocyte-mediated immunity. The association of peritumoral area with response identification might be partially attributed to type I interferon-related biological process. A combination of peritumoral radiomics features appears to improve the predictive performance of intratumoral radiomics to estimate pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. This study underlines the significant application of peritumoral radiomics to assess treatment response in clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32910196
pii: 2770363
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15927
pmc: PMC7489831
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2015927Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
J Nucl Med. 2017 May;58(5):723-729
pubmed: 27738011
Ann Oncol. 2020 Mar 30;:
pubmed: 32240794
Radiol Artif Intell. 2019 Mar 20;1(2):e180012
pubmed: 32076657
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Nov 15;102(4):1002-1007
pubmed: 30055238
Genome Res. 2003 Nov;13(11):2498-504
pubmed: 14597658
Cell Syst. 2015 Dec 23;1(6):417-425
pubmed: 26771021
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):1090-1098
pubmed: 26254683
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e192561
pubmed: 31002322
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
Ann Nucl Med. 2019 Sep;33(9):657-670
pubmed: 31218571
Eur J Cancer. 2007 Aug;43(12):1833-41
pubmed: 17627812
Ann Surg. 2016 Nov;264(5):831-838
pubmed: 27741010
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Nov 26;8:53
pubmed: 19036144
Radiology. 2019 Mar;290(3):783-792
pubmed: 30561278
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 1;23(19):4330-7
pubmed: 15781882
Cancer Res. 2003 Oct 15;63(20):6784-90
pubmed: 14583474
J Radiat Res. 2019 Jul 1;60(4):538-545
pubmed: 31111948
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Oct;40(10):1500-6
pubmed: 23764889
Radiology. 2017 Nov;285(2):401-413
pubmed: 28708462
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 May 18;19(1):57
pubmed: 28521821
J Immunol Res. 2019 Mar 31;2019:7596786
pubmed: 31049360
Nature. 2015 May 7;521(7550):94-8
pubmed: 25924065
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 15;5(11):e13984
pubmed: 21085593
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 10;32(23):2416-22
pubmed: 24982463
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Jun;129(6):1232-41
pubmed: 15942562
Radiology. 2018 Jun;287(3):983-992
pubmed: 29533721
Front Oncol. 2020 Jan 31;10:53
pubmed: 32083007
Cancer. 2005 Oct 1;104(7):1349-55
pubmed: 16130133
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Apr;168(3):703-712
pubmed: 29302764
EBioMedicine. 2019 Aug;46:160-169
pubmed: 31395503
Cancer. 2005 Apr 1;103(7):1347-55
pubmed: 15719440
Brief Bioinform. 2013 Jul;14(4):469-90
pubmed: 22851511
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Dec;42(6):958-64
pubmed: 22466694
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 24;6:23428
pubmed: 27009765
Nucl Med Commun. 2016 Sep;37(9):947-55
pubmed: 27145438
Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e104-e107
pubmed: 29092951
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15545-50
pubmed: 16199517
JAMA Surg. 2015 Jun;150(6):555-62
pubmed: 25902198
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Apr 1;85(5):1375-82
pubmed: 23219566
F1000Res. 2016 Jul 15;5:1717
pubmed: 27830058
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 20;36(27):2796-2803
pubmed: 30089078
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Jul 15;24(14):3397-3408
pubmed: 29661777
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 15;9(1):10229
pubmed: 31308460
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 1;26(7):1086-92
pubmed: 18309943
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Sep;138:141-148
pubmed: 31252296
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;37(12):1064-71
pubmed: 21944048
BMC Cancer. 2009 Aug 05;9:269
pubmed: 19656375
Cell. 2016 May 19;165(5):1092-1105
pubmed: 27133165
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 25;371(26):2499-509
pubmed: 25539106
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2074-84
pubmed: 22646630
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;14(12):749-762
pubmed: 28975929