Feasibility of using point-of-care lung ultrasound for early triage of COVID-19 patients in the emergency room.
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
COVID-19 Testing
Clinical Laboratory Techniques
Coronavirus Infections
/ diagnosis
Emergency Service, Hospital
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral
/ diagnostic imaging
Point-of-Care Systems
Predictive Value of Tests
Retrospective Studies
SARS-CoV-2
Sensitivity and Specificity
Triage
COVID-19
Emergency room
Negative predictive value
POCUS lung
Sensitivity
Journal
Emergency radiology
ISSN: 1438-1435
Titre abrégé: Emerg Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9431227
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
14
06
2020
accepted:
31
08
2020
pubmed:
11
9
2020
medline:
1
12
2020
entrez:
10
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Diagnostic value of point-of-care lung ultrasound (POCUS) in detection of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in an emergency setting is currently unclear. In this study, we aimed to compare diagnostic performance, in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy, of POCUS lung, chest CT, and RT-PCR for clinically suspected COVID-19 infections in patients submitting to the emergency room (ER). This retrospective study enrolled 93 patients with a suspected COVID-19 infection, admitted to the ER between March 28th and April 20th, 2020. Test subjects showed one or more symptoms of an acute respiratory infection, for which consequent COVID-19 testing was achieved using POCUS lung, chest CT, and RT-PCR. CT images were analyzed by 2 radiologists blinded to RT-PCR results. POCUS lung was performed by three emergency medical doctors, and reports were analyzed by the researcher, blinded to clinical information, US imaging, CT, and RT-PCR test results. Compared with RT-PCR, POCUS lung demonstrated outstanding sensitivity and NPV (93.3% and 94.1% respectively) while showing poor values for specificity, PPV, and accuracy (21.3%, 19.2%, and 33.3% respectively). In contrast, similar inquiries using chest CT as index test, excellent sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and accuracy (80.0%, 86.7%, 95.6%, and 85.6%, respectively) were reported, beside a moderate value for PPV (54.5%). POCUS may provide early ER triage with a useful, rapid, low-threshold, and safe screening tool in evaluating possible COVID-19 infections. Due to limited specificity, suggestive POCUS lung findings should be confirmed with RT-PCR or chest CT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32910323
doi: 10.1007/s10140-020-01849-3
pii: 10.1007/s10140-020-01849-3
pmc: PMC7481756
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
663-670Références
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 13;21(3):470-472
pubmed: 32302278
J Clin Ultrasound. 2015 May;43(4):230-234
pubmed: 25224838
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Nov;37(11):2020-2027
pubmed: 30819579
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012 Jan;5(1):70-1
pubmed: 22416159
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020 Feb 13;2(1):e200034
pubmed: 33778547
Eur J Radiol Open. 2020;7:100231
pubmed: 32289051
J Med Virol. 2020 Jun;92(6):577-583
pubmed: 32162702
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E32-E40
pubmed: 32101510
Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):E145-E155
pubmed: 32301646
Chest. 2008 Jul;134(1):117-25
pubmed: 18403664
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 25;6:CD013652
pubmed: 32584464
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar 15;199(6):701-714
pubmed: 30372119
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;20(4):425-434
pubmed: 32105637
New Microbes New Infect. 2020 Mar 31;35:100672
pubmed: 32322400
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020 Apr 21;2(2):e200196
pubmed: 33778576
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Mar;8(3):e11-e12
pubmed: 32061335
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):849-850
pubmed: 32166346
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Mar;24(5):2776-2780
pubmed: 32196627
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020 Mar 17;2(2):e200110
pubmed: 33778566
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Apr 10;21(7):
pubmed: 32290293
Radiology. 2020 Jun;295(3):715-721
pubmed: 32053470
BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527
pubmed: 26511519