Electroconvulsive therapy, personal protective equipment and aerosol generating procedures: a review to guide practice during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
Coronavirus Infections
/ epidemiology
Electroconvulsive Therapy
/ adverse effects
Humans
Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional
/ prevention & control
Mental Disorders
/ therapy
Occupational Exposure
/ prevention & control
Pandemics
/ prevention & control
Personal Protective Equipment
Pneumonia, Viral
/ epidemiology
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
/ standards
SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
aerosol-generating procedure
electroconvulsive therapy
manual ventilation
personal protective equipment
Journal
Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists
ISSN: 1440-1665
Titre abrégé: Australas Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9613603
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
11
9
2020
medline:
2
12
2020
entrez:
10
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To review the literature on the definition of aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs), identify high-risk AGPs, guidelines to use personal protective equipment (PPE) and review evidence to see if electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a high-risk AGP requiring the use of PPE. Existing guidelines and research data were reviewed to answer the questions. There is consensus about the type of anaesthesia used during ECT, what constitutes AGPs and what PPE should be used. It was not clear if ECT was an AGP, but we argue that it is one based on evidence. We conclude that ECT is an AGP and that it requires the appropriate use of PPE after taking in to account local supply and demand.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32910692
doi: 10.1177/1039856220953699
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM