Trait Variation in Moths Mirrors Small-Scaled Ecological Gradients in A Tropical Forest Landscape.
Costa Rica
aposematism
body size
lowland rainforest
mimicry rings
oil palm plantations
Journal
Insects
ISSN: 2075-4450
Titre abrégé: Insects
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101574235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Sep 2020
08 Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
24
07
2020
revised:
28
08
2020
accepted:
04
09
2020
entrez:
11
9
2020
pubmed:
12
9
2020
medline:
12
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Along environmental gradients, communities are expected to be filtered from the regional species pool by physical constraints, resource availability, and biotic interactions. This should be reflected in species trait composition. Using data on species-rich moth assemblages sampled by light traps in a lowland rainforest landscape in Costa Rica, we show that moths in two unrelated clades (Erebidae-Arctiinae; Geometridae) are much smaller-sized in oil palm plantations than in nearby old-growth forest, with intermediate values at disturbed forest sites. In old-growth forest, Arctiinae predominantly show aposematic coloration as a means of anti-predator defense, whereas this trait is much reduced in the prevalence in plantations. Similarly, participation in Müllerian mimicry rings with Hymenoptera and Lycidae beetles, respectively, is rare in plantations. Across three topographic types of old-growth forests, community-weighted means of moth traits showed little variation, but in creek forest, both types of mimicry were surprisingly rare. Our results emphasize that despite their mobility, moth assemblages are strongly shaped by local environmental conditions through the interplay of bottom-up and top-down processes. Assemblages in oil palm plantations are highly degraded not only in their biodiversity, but also in terms of trait expression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32911785
pii: insects11090612
doi: 10.3390/insects11090612
pmc: PMC7563231
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 30;10(10):e0141480
pubmed: 26517873
PLoS One. 2015 May 08;10(5):e0122432
pubmed: 25955243
Ecol Appl. 2008 Jun;18(4):821-5
pubmed: 18536244
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Nov;20(11):598-603
pubmed: 16701442
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 10;9(3):e91783
pubmed: 24614755
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 Feb;85(1):139-69
pubmed: 20015316
Oecologia. 2015 Dec;179(4):1147-58
pubmed: 26296333
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 27;12(12):e0188430
pubmed: 29281664
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 22;269(1495):983-90
pubmed: 12028753
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 19;10(1):5066
pubmed: 32193471
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 18;9(7):e101975
pubmed: 25036028
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Jun;94(3):999-1022
pubmed: 30548743
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e84308
pubmed: 24391935
Chemoecology. 2008;18(2):109-119
pubmed: 18698369
Ecology. 2006 Oct;87(10):2411-7
pubmed: 17089649