Caregiver and service provider vaccine confidence following the Changchun Changsheng vaccine incident in China: A cross-sectional mixed methods study.
Adult
Caregivers
/ psychology
China
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Immunization Programs
Male
Medical Staff
/ psychology
Middle Aged
Quality Control
Rabies Vaccines
/ adverse effects
Safety-Based Drug Withdrawals
Surveys and Questionnaires
Trust
/ psychology
Vaccination
/ statistics & numerical data
Vaccination Refusal
/ psychology
Acceptance
China
Confidence
Vaccine
Vaccine incident
Journal
Vaccine
ISSN: 1873-2518
Titre abrégé: Vaccine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8406899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 10 2020
14 10 2020
Historique:
received:
05
06
2020
revised:
23
08
2020
accepted:
25
08
2020
pubmed:
12
9
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
11
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Changchun Changsheng Vaccine Incident (CCVI) occurred mid-2018 and involved irregularities in the manufacture and quality control of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular-pertussis and rabies vaccines. This study investigates vaccine confidence amongst Chinese caregivers and vaccination-service providers (VSPs) six months after the CCVI. Quantitative surveys were conducted in January 2019 with 2124 caregivers of children and 555 VSPs in three areas in China. The proportions of respondents who agreed to the four statements from the Vaccine Confidence Index™ were used to measure vaccine confidence. Descriptive and univariate analyses were performed to study the level of vaccine confidence. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 48 caregivers, 43 VSPs and 9 immunization program managers. Interviews were analyzed thematically using a combination of deductive and inductive coding. Media surveillance was conducted to monitor public responses to the CCVI. Media surveillance indicated that public attention to vaccine-related issues increased sharply immediately post-CCVI but declined rapidly thereafter. Six months post-CCVI, 96.0% of caregivers and the same proportion of VSPs reported that vaccination was important and compatible with their religious beliefs. 82.7% and 88.2% of caregivers agreed that vaccines were safe and effective. 92.8% and 94.6% of VSPs agreed that vaccines were safe and effective. Both caregivers and VSPs reported an immediate decline in vaccine confidence post-CCVI. In most cases this trust was regained over time following government and public health responses, however some people remained hesitant about vaccinating their children. Many VSPs were overwhelmed by consultations, workload and psychological pressure after the CCVI. After an initial decline, vaccine confidence recovered to pre-incident levels six months after the CCVI. However, some caregivers moved from the higher to the lower end of the vaccine confidence spectrum, pointing to the need to promote the acceptance of vaccination especially given the need for new vaccines to control the coronavirus epidemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32912643
pii: S0264-410X(20)31115-4
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.08.063
pmc: PMC7476908
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines
0
Rabies Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6882-6888Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Vaccine. 2019 Jul 9;37(30):3936-3937
pubmed: 31204157
Vaccine. 2019 Jun 6;37(26):3419-3425
pubmed: 31097351
Lancet. 2018 Aug 4;392(10145):360
pubmed: 30102159
Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4161-4
pubmed: 25896383
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jan;20(1):1-4
pubmed: 29335073
EBioMedicine. 2016 Oct;12:295-301
pubmed: 27658738
Vaccine. 2014 Apr 25;32(20):2281-7
pubmed: 24631097
Vaccine. 2019 Aug 23;37(36):5270-5275
pubmed: 31345640
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;45(2):441-9
pubmed: 27174834
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Jul 3;14(7):1672-1678
pubmed: 29771622
Health Commun. 2020 Feb 10;:1-10
pubmed: 32036688