Observational study on off-label use of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19.


Journal

European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice
ISSN: 2047-9956
Titre abrégé: Eur J Hosp Pharm
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101578294

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2021
Historique:
received: 15 06 2020
revised: 17 08 2020
accepted: 18 08 2020
pubmed: 12 9 2020
medline: 8 1 2021
entrez: 11 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In December 2019 a novel coronavirus designated SARS-CoV-2 was identified, and the disease COVID-19 has caused many deaths. SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with the development of cytokine storm (including interleukin 6 (IL-6)), which can cause lung damage and lack of oxygen. Tocilizumab (TCZ) inhibits ligand binding to the IL-6 receptor and may be a potential treatment for the hyperinflammation symptoms of COVID-19. However, data regarding the efficacy of TCZ in COVID-19 are lacking. The rapid spread of the pandemic in France, especially in the Paris region, constrained us to the off-label use of TCZ in patients with severe clinical conditions. A single-centre observational cohort study of 44 patients infected with COVID-19 was carried out between 6 April and 21 April 2020 in Groupe Hospitalier Intercommunal Le Raincy-Montfermeil (GHILRM). Twenty-two patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were treated with TCZ and were compared with 22 patients not treated with TCZ matched for age, gender and length of hospital stay for COVID-19. Respiratory rate and oxygen supplementation as well as laboratory parameters (such as C-reactive protein (CRP), aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase) were collected at baseline and during 14 days of follow-up. Our primary objective was to assess the efficacy of TCZ on respiratory clinical conditions. The average respiratory rate was lower in the TCZ group than in the control group (21.5 vs 25.5 breaths/min at day 14, 95% CI -7 There was a significant difference in the respiratory rate on day 14 of follow-up, with a greater decrease observed in the treated group. Fewer patients required mechanical ventilation in the TCZ group, especially among patients with more extensive CT lung damage, than in the control group. The same number of patients were weaned off oxygen on day 14 in the two groups, while the patients in the TCZ group had more severe impairment at inclusion. We consider that TCZ showed significant control of the biological inflammatory syndrome, suggesting that it may limit the effect of the cytokine storm. Our study seems to indicate the efficacy of TCZ, particularly in patients with severe initial pulmonary impairment. Selecting the best candidates and the best timing for TCZ therapy needs to be determined in randomised clinical trials.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
In December 2019 a novel coronavirus designated SARS-CoV-2 was identified, and the disease COVID-19 has caused many deaths. SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with the development of cytokine storm (including interleukin 6 (IL-6)), which can cause lung damage and lack of oxygen. Tocilizumab (TCZ) inhibits ligand binding to the IL-6 receptor and may be a potential treatment for the hyperinflammation symptoms of COVID-19. However, data regarding the efficacy of TCZ in COVID-19 are lacking. The rapid spread of the pandemic in France, especially in the Paris region, constrained us to the off-label use of TCZ in patients with severe clinical conditions.
METHODS
A single-centre observational cohort study of 44 patients infected with COVID-19 was carried out between 6 April and 21 April 2020 in Groupe Hospitalier Intercommunal Le Raincy-Montfermeil (GHILRM). Twenty-two patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were treated with TCZ and were compared with 22 patients not treated with TCZ matched for age, gender and length of hospital stay for COVID-19. Respiratory rate and oxygen supplementation as well as laboratory parameters (such as C-reactive protein (CRP), aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase) were collected at baseline and during 14 days of follow-up. Our primary objective was to assess the efficacy of TCZ on respiratory clinical conditions.
FINDINGS
The average respiratory rate was lower in the TCZ group than in the control group (21.5 vs 25.5 breaths/min at day 14, 95% CI -7
INTERPRETATION
There was a significant difference in the respiratory rate on day 14 of follow-up, with a greater decrease observed in the treated group. Fewer patients required mechanical ventilation in the TCZ group, especially among patients with more extensive CT lung damage, than in the control group. The same number of patients were weaned off oxygen on day 14 in the two groups, while the patients in the TCZ group had more severe impairment at inclusion. We consider that TCZ showed significant control of the biological inflammatory syndrome, suggesting that it may limit the effect of the cytokine storm. Our study seems to indicate the efficacy of TCZ, particularly in patients with severe initial pulmonary impairment. Selecting the best candidates and the best timing for TCZ therapy needs to be determined in randomised clinical trials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32912961
pii: ejhpharm-2020-002414
doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002414
pmc: PMC7484788
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Antiviral Agents 0
C-Reactive Protein 9007-41-4
Creatinine AYI8EX34EU
tocilizumab I031V2H011

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

22-27

Informations de copyright

© European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Sep;69(9):1751-1761
pubmed: 28597609
Autoimmun Rev. 2020 Jul;19(7):102568
pubmed: 32376398
J Med Virol. 2020 Oct;92(10):2042-2049
pubmed: 32369191
J Med Virol. 2020 Oct;92(10):1787-1788
pubmed: 32297987
J Med Virol. 2020 Jul;92(7):814-818
pubmed: 32253759
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020 May-Jun;38(3):529-532
pubmed: 32359035
Laryngoscope. 2020 Jul;130(7):1787
pubmed: 32237238
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 19;15(3):e0230548
pubmed: 32191764
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 19;117(20):10970-10975
pubmed: 32350134
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
J Crit Care. 2020 Aug;58:29-33
pubmed: 32330817
J Transl Med. 2020 Apr 14;18(1):164
pubmed: 32290839
Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1):e15-e19
pubmed: 32343968
Med Mal Infect. 2020 Aug;50(5):397-400
pubmed: 32387320
Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Jun;40(6):511-518
pubmed: 32337664

Auteurs

Laetitia Albertini (L)

Pharmacist, Montfermeil, France albertini.laetitia@gmail.com.

Mickael Soletchnik (M)

Emergency, Montfermeil, France.

Anais Razurel (A)

Pharmacist, CH Saint Denis, Saint Denis, Île-de-France, France.

Johana Cohen (J)

Intensive care, Montfermeil, France.

Frédéric Bidegain (F)

Infectious diseases, Montfermeil, France.

Francis Fauvelle (F)

Pharmacy, Montfermeil, France.

Geoffroy Safrano (G)

Emergency, Montfermeil, France.

Jacques Piquet (J)

Pneumology, Montfermeil, France.

Cyril Maurer (C)

Pneumology, Montfermeil, France.

Dany Goldgran-Toledano (D)

Intensive care, Montfermeil, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH