CHIP ubiquitylates NOXA and induces its lysosomal degradation in response to DNA damage.


Journal

Cell death & disease
ISSN: 2041-4889
Titre abrégé: Cell Death Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101524092

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 09 2020
Historique:
received: 15 11 2019
accepted: 30 07 2020
revised: 29 07 2020
entrez: 11 9 2020
pubmed: 12 9 2020
medline: 28 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The BH3-only protein NOXA is a regulator of mitochondrial apoptosis by specifically antagonizing the anti-apoptotic protein MCL-1. Here we show that the E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP controls NOXA stability after DNA damage. Our findings reveal that CHIP and MCL-1 are binding partners of NOXA and differentially define the fate of NOXA. Whereas NOXA is initially targeted to mitochondria upon MCL-1-binding, CHIP mediates ubiquitylation of cytosolic NOXA and promotes lysosomal degradation of NOXA, which is not bound by MCL-1. Our data indicate that MCL-1 defines NOXA abundance and its pro-apoptotic activity. Increased NOXA levels beyond this threshold are effectively removed by lysosomal protein degradation triggered via CHIP-mediated ubiquitylation. Together, these results shed new light on regulatory circuits controlling DNA damage response and identified the E3 ligase CHIP as a new molecular guardian, which restricts the cytosolic accumulation of NOXA upon genotoxic stress.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32913203
doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-02923-x
pii: 10.1038/s41419-020-02923-x
pmc: PMC7484759
doi:

Substances chimiques

STUB1 protein, human EC 2.3.2.27
Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases EC 2.3.2.27

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

740

Références

Oda, E. et al. Noxa, a BH3-only member of the Bcl-2 family and candidate mediator of p53-induced apoptosis. Science 288, 1053–1058 (2000).
pubmed: 10807576
Albert, M. C., Brinkmann, K. & Kashkar, H. Noxa and cancer therapy: tuning up the mitochondrial death machinery in response to chemotherapy. Mol. Cell Oncol. 1, e29906 (2014).
pubmed: 27308315 pmcid: 4905168
Chen, L. et al. Differential targeting of prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins by their BH3-only ligands allows complementary apoptotic function. Mol. Cell 17, 393–403 (2005).
pubmed: 15694340
Kozopas, K. M., Yang, T., Buchan, H. L., Zhou, P. & Craig, R. W. MCL1, a gene expressed in programmed myeloid cell differentiation, has sequence similarity to BCL2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 3516–3520 (1993).
pubmed: 7682708
Shibue, T. et al. Integral role of Noxa in p53-mediated apoptotic response. Genes Dev. 17, 2233–2238 (2003).
pubmed: 12952892 pmcid: 196460
Adams, J. M. & Cory, S. The BCL-2 arbiters of apoptosis and their growing role as cancer targets. Cell Death Differ. 25, 27–36 (2018).
pubmed: 29099483
Brinkmann, K. & Kashkar, H. Targeting the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway: a preferred approach in hematologic malignancies? Cell Death Dis. 5, e1098 (2014).
pubmed: 24603326 pmcid: 3973243
Ploner, C., Kofler, R. & Villunger, A. Noxa: at the tip of the balance between life and death. Oncogene 27, S84–S92 (2008).
pubmed: 19641509 pmcid: 3272398
Baou, M. et al. Role of NOXA and its ubiquitination in proteasome inhibitor-induced apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Haematologica 95, 1510–1518 (2010).
pubmed: 20378569 pmcid: 2930952
Pang, X. et al. The carboxyl-terminal tail of Noxa protein regulates the stability of Noxa and Mcl-1. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 17802–17811 (2014).
pubmed: 24811167 pmcid: 4067213
Zhou, W. et al. Neddylation E2 UBE2F promotes the survival of lung cancer cells by activating CRL5 to degrade NOXA via the K11 linkage. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 1104–1116 (2017).
pubmed: 27591266
Puthalakath, H. & Strasser, A. Keeping killers on a tight leash: transcriptional and post-translational control of the pro-apoptotic activity of BH3-only proteins. Cell Death Differ. 9, 505–512 (2002).
pubmed: 11973609
Bilardi, R. A. et al. Impact of loss of BH3-only proteins on the development and treatment of MLL-fusion gene-driven AML in mice. Cell Death Dis. 7, e2351 (2016).
pubmed: 27584789 pmcid: 5059861
Brinkmann, K. et al. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 potentiates cancer chemosensitivity by stabilizing NOXA. Cell Rep. 3, 881–891 (2013).
pubmed: 23499448
Seeger, J. M. et al. The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib sensitizes melanoma cells toward adoptive CTL attack. Cancer Res. 70, 1825–1834 (2010).
pubmed: 20179203
Dengler, M. A. et al. Discrepant NOXA (PMAIP1) transcript and NOXA protein levels: a potential Achilles’ heel in mantle cell lymphoma. Cell Death Dis. 5, e1013 (2014).
pubmed: 24457957 pmcid: 4040662
Arai, S. et al. MARCH5 mediates NOXA-dependent MCL1 degradation driven by kinase inhibitors and integrated stress response activation. Elife 9, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54954 (2020).
Djajawi, T. M. et al. MARCH5 requires MTCH2 to coordinate proteasomal turnover of the MCL1:NOXA complex. Cell Death Differ. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-020-0517-0 (2020).
Haschka, M. D. et al. MARCH5-dependent degradation of MCL1/NOXA complexes defines susceptibility to antimitotic drug treatment. Cell Death Differ. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-020-0503-6 (2020).
Buetow, L. & Huang, D. T. Structural insights into the catalysis and regulation of E3 ubiquitin ligases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 626–642 (2016).
pubmed: 27485899 pmcid: 6211636
Broemer, M. & Meier, P. Ubiquitin-mediated regulation of apoptosis. Trends Cell Biol. 19, 130–140 (2009).
pubmed: 19217783
Hershko, A. & Ciechanover, A. The ubiquitin system. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 425–479 (1998).
pubmed: 9759494
Ye, Y. & Rape, M. Building ubiquitin chains: E2 enzymes at work. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 755–764 (2009).
pubmed: 19851334 pmcid: 3107738
Komander, D. & Rape, M. The ubiquitin code. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81, 203–229 (2012).
pubmed: 22524316
Ballinger, C. A. et al. Identification of CHIP, a novel tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein that interacts with heat shock proteins and negatively regulates chaperone functions. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 4535–4545 (1999).
pubmed: 10330192 pmcid: 104411
Jiang, J. et al. CHIP is a U-box-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase: identification of Hsc70 as a target for ubiquitylation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 42938–42944 (2001).
pubmed: 11557750
Kashkar, H., Wiegmann, K., Yazdanpanah, B., Haubert, D. & Kronke, M. Acid sphingomyelinase is indispensable for UV light-induced Bax conformational change at the mitochondrial membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 20804–20813 (2005).
pubmed: 15743760
Kashkar, H. et al. XIAP-mediated caspase inhibition in Hodgkin’s lymphoma-derived B cells. J. Exp. Med. 198, 341–347 (2003).
pubmed: 12874265 pmcid: 2194071
Villunger, A. et al. p53- and drug-induced apoptotic responses mediated by BH3-only proteins puma and noxa. Science 302, 1036–1038 (2003).
pubmed: 14500851
Kamura, T. et al. Rbx1, a component of the VHL tumor suppressor complex and SCF ubiquitin ligase. Science 284, 657–661 (1999).
pubmed: 10213691
Nakatani, Y. et al. Regulation of ubiquitin transfer by XIAP, a dimeric RING E3 ligase. Biochem. J. 450, 629–638 (2013).
pubmed: 23259674
Hatakeyama, S., Yada, M., Matsumoto, M., Ishida, N. & Nakayama, K. I. U box proteins as a new family of ubiquitin-protein ligases. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 33111–33120 (2001).
pubmed: 11435423
Mattiroli, F. & Sixma, T. K. Lysine-targeting specificity in ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modification pathways. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 308–316 (2014).
pubmed: 24699079
Ohtake, F., Tsuchiya, H., Saeki, Y. & Tanaka, K. K63 ubiquitylation triggers proteasomal degradation by seeding branched ubiquitin chains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E1401–E1408 (2018).
pubmed: 29378950
Chen, Z. J. & Sun, L. J. Nonproteolytic functions of ubiquitin in cell signaling. Mol. Cell 33, 275–286 (2009).
pubmed: 19217402
Swatek, K. N. & Komander, D. Ubiquitin modifications. Cell Res. 26, 399–422 (2016).
pubmed: 27012465 pmcid: 4822133
Arndt, V. et al. Chaperone-assisted selective autophagy is essential for muscle maintenance. Curr. Biol. 20, 143–148 (2010).
pubmed: 20060297
Seo, J. et al. CHIP controls necroptosis through ubiquitylation- and lysosome-dependent degradation of RIPK3. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 291–302 (2016).
pubmed: 26900751
Ferreira, J. V. et al. STUB1/CHIP is required for HIF1A degradation by chaperone-mediated autophagy. Autophagy 9, 1349–1366 (2013).
pubmed: 23880665
Tawo, R. et al. The ubiquitin ligase CHIP integrates proteostasis and aging by regulation of insulin receptor turnover. Cell 169, 470–482 e413 (2017).
pubmed: 28431247 pmcid: 5406386
Martell, J. D. et al. Engineered ascorbate peroxidase as a genetically encoded reporter for electron microscopy. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 1143–1148 (2012).
pubmed: 23086203 pmcid: 3699407
Happo, L., Strasser, A. & Cory, S. BH3-only proteins in apoptosis at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 125, 1081–1087 (2012).
pubmed: 22492984 pmcid: 3324577
Youle, R. J. & Strasser, A. The BCL-2 protein family: opposing activities that mediate cell death. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 47–59 (2008).
pubmed: 18097445
Huang, D. C. & Strasser, A. BH3-Only proteins-essential initiators of apoptotic cell death. Cell 103, 839–842 (2000).
pubmed: 11136969
Lowman, X. H. et al. The proapoptotic function of Noxa in human leukemia cells is regulated by the kinase Cdk5 and by glucose. Mol. Cell 40, 823–833 (2010).
pubmed: 21145489
Craxton, A. et al. NOXA, a sensor of proteasome integrity, is degraded by 26S proteasomes by an ubiquitin-independent pathway that is blocked by MCL-1. Cell Death Differ. 19, 1424–1434 (2012).
pubmed: 22361683 pmcid: 3422467
Kevei, E., Pokrzywa, W. & Hoppe, T. Repair or destruction-an intimate liaison between ubiquitin ligases and molecular chaperones in proteostasis. FEBS Lett. 591, 2616–2635 (2017).
pubmed: 28699655 pmcid: 5601288

Auteurs

Marie-Christine Albert (MC)

Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene (IMMIH), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Kerstin Brinkmann (K)

Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene (IMMIH), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
The Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (WEHI) and Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Wojciech Pokrzywa (W)

Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Laboratory of Protein Metabolism in Development and Aging, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Warsaw, Poland.

Saskia Diana Günther (SD)

Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene (IMMIH), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Martin Krönke (M)

Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene (IMMIH), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Thorsten Hoppe (T)

Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. thorsten.hoppe@uni-koeln.de.
Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. thorsten.hoppe@uni-koeln.de.
Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. thorsten.hoppe@uni-koeln.de.

Hamid Kashkar (H)

Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene (IMMIH), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. h.kashkar@uni-koeln.de.
Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. h.kashkar@uni-koeln.de.
Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. h.kashkar@uni-koeln.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH