HEART Score of Four for Age and Risk Factors: A Case Series.
acute coronary syndrome
age
chest pain
emergency department
four
heart score
major adverse cardiac events
risk factors
risk stratify
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Aug 2020
05 Aug 2020
Historique:
entrez:
11
9
2020
pubmed:
12
9
2020
medline:
12
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Chest pain is a frequent chief complaint in the ED. Identifying acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and establishing proper disposition for further risk assessment for major adverse cardiac events are paramount. The HEART Score is a key decision-making tool used to determine patient risk and disposition. One scenario with a potential drawback of the HEART Score is found in patients with a score of four based solely on age and risk factors. The HEART Score categorizes a score of three or less as low risk, and patients with scores above this threshold are typically admitted. We present six cases of chest pain presenting to a military emergency department with a score of four based solely on age and risk factors. They represent every such case found in a previously created database used to validate the HEART Score. We followed each case forward one year in electronic medical records to identify major adverse cardiac events. With the exception of one case that was placed on hospice for non-cardiac reasons and subsequently lost to follow up, there were no adverse events. There is a rising concern for increasing hospital admission rates, overuse of resources, and cost. We highlight that this subset of HEART Score patients requires a more nuanced risk stratification in the ED. It may be worth the time and effort to risk stratify this subset with coronary computed tomography angiography. This additional effort may help reduce admission at such a patient's current and future presentations to the ED for chest pain.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32913692
doi: 10.7759/cureus.9576
pmc: PMC7474560
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
e9576Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, Webb et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclaimer: The view(s) expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of Brooke Army Medical Center, the U.S. Army Medical Department, the U.S. Army Office of the Surgeon General, the Department of the Army, the Department of the Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.
Références
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2):195-203
pubmed: 25737484
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;67(4):460-468.e1
pubmed: 26507904
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013 Sep 26;13:77
pubmed: 24070098
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 12;366(15):1393-403
pubmed: 22449295
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2153-8
pubmed: 23465250
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2010 Sep;9(3):164-9
pubmed: 20802272
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;13(5):727-748
pubmed: 28895038
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;26(2):140-151
pubmed: 30375097
Circulation. 2018 Nov 27;138(22):2456-2468
pubmed: 30571347
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-e228
pubmed: 25260718
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;13(8):1249-1255
pubmed: 29512019
Neth Heart J. 2008 Jun;16(6):191-6
pubmed: 18665203
J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;54(4):549-557
pubmed: 29478861
Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 16;166(10):689-697
pubmed: 28437795
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;22(7):883-6
pubmed: 26118834
Circulation. 2010 Oct 26;122(17):1756-76
pubmed: 20660809