Predicting Postherpetic Neuralgia in Patients with Herpes Zoster by Machine Learning: A Retrospective Study.
Herpes zoster
Logistic regression machine learning
Postherpetic neuralgia
Probability
Random forest
Journal
Pain and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8237
Titre abrégé: Pain Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101634491
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
21
07
2020
pubmed:
12
9
2020
medline:
12
9
2020
entrez:
11
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a neuropathic pain secondary to shingles. Studies have shown that early pain intervention can reduce the incidence or intensity of PHN. The aim of this study was to predict whether a patient with acute herpetic neuralgia will develop PHN and to help clinicians make better decisions. Five hundred two patients with shingles were reviewed and classified according to whether they had PHN. The risk factors associated with PHN were determined by univariate analysis. Logistic regression and random forest algorithms were used to do machine learning, and then the prediction accuracies of the two algorithms were compared, choosing the superior one to predict the next 60 new cases. Age, NRS score, rash site, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score, antiviral therapy and immunosuppression were found related to the occurrence of PHN. The NRS score was the most closely related factor with an importance of 0.31. As for accuracy, the random forest was 96.24%, better than that of logistic regression in which the accuracy was 92.83%. Then, the random forest model was used to predict 60 newly diagnosed patients with herpes zoster, and the accuracy rate was 88.33% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 77.43-95.18%. This study provides an idea and a method in which, by analyzing the data of previous cases, we can develop a predictive model to predict whether patients with shingles will develop PHN.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32915399
doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00196-y
pii: 10.1007/s40122-020-00196-y
pmc: PMC7648805
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
627-635Références
Korean J Pain. 2017 Jan;30(1):3-17
pubmed: 28119767
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2010 Oct;34(7):535-42
pubmed: 20430583
Dermatology. 2019;235(5):426-433
pubmed: 31256167
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 23;71(7):e125-e134
pubmed: 31677266
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(32):e4577
pubmed: 27512887
Pain Pract. 2019 Jun;19(5):476-483
pubmed: 30659740
Clin J Pain. 2013 Aug;29(8):733-6
pubmed: 23835767
Eur J Pain. 2015 Feb;19(2):193-201
pubmed: 25070366
Neurology. 2016 Jul 5;87(1):94-102
pubmed: 27287218
Clin J Pain. 2018 Nov;34(11):1025-1031
pubmed: 29698250
Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:861-71
pubmed: 23109810
Vaccine. 2018 Aug 9;36(33):5037-5045
pubmed: 30017145
Methods Inf Med. 2017;56(5):401-406
pubmed: 29582935
Skin Res Technol. 2012 Feb;18(1):88-93
pubmed: 21605168
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 Sep 21;9:447-454
pubmed: 27703368
Pain Physician. 2017 Jul;20(5):397-403
pubmed: 28727702
Neurobiol Aging. 2016 Oct;46:180-91
pubmed: 27500865
Surgery. 2011 Jan;149(1):87-93
pubmed: 20466403
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2013 Apr;14(2):77-85
pubmed: 23456596
Pain Physician. 2017 Jul;20(5):E687-E699
pubmed: 28727713
Pain. 2016 Jan;157(1):30-54
pubmed: 26218719
Pain Ther. 2019 Dec;8(2):249-259
pubmed: 31218562
N Engl J Med. 1996 Jul 4;335(1):32-42
pubmed: 8637540
Scand J Pain. 2017 Jul;16:61-63
pubmed: 28850413