Snakes and ladders: World development pathways' synergies and trade-offs through the lens of the Sustainable Development Goals.

Bioeconomy CGE modelling Global foresight study SDGs

Journal

Journal of cleaner production
ISSN: 0959-6526
Titre abrégé: J Clean Prod
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101538287

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Sep 2020
Historique:
entrez: 14 9 2020
pubmed: 15 9 2020
medline: 15 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This paper takes three global visions of world development to 2050 and quantifies their implications for sustainable progress employing the metrics of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDG outcomes are structured through the interconnectivities of the three 'wedding cake' layers of 'economy', 'society' and 'biosphere', as posited by the Stockholm Resilience Centre. The key policy contribution is to quantify the resulting SDG synergies and trade-offs, whilst also decomposing and calculating the part-worth of the market drivers which contribute to these outcomes. The paper employs a global economic simulation model that combines rational market behaviour with environmental constraints (MAGNET) and is further extended with an SDG metrics module. A 'non-sustainable' world reveals trade-offs between economy and biosphere SDGs, with population growth of particular concern to a safe planetary operating space in the world's poorest regions. Sustainable visions could reduce natural resource pressures and emissions and meet energy requirements at potentially limited economic cost. Notwithstanding, these futures do not address income inequalities and potentially increase food security concerns for the most vulnerable members of society. Consequently, developed region led international cooperation and in-kind income transfers to developing countries, constitutes a necessary prerequisite to help remedy the SDG trade-offs exhibited within the more sustainable global pathways.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32921933
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122147
pii: S0959-6526(20)32194-6
pii: 122147
pmc: PMC7323613
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

122147

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):519-525
pubmed: 30305731
Science. 2018 Aug 17;361(6403):650-652
pubmed: 30115798
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 13;113(50):14294-14299
pubmed: 27911797
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 22;114(34):8939-8944
pubmed: 28028219
Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019 Jul;146:514-522
pubmed: 31274960

Auteurs

George Philippidis (G)

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Seville, Spain.
Aragonese Agency for Research and Development (ARAID), Centre for Agro-Food Research and, Technology (CITA), Agrifood Institute of Aragón (IA2), Government of Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.

Lindsay Shutes (L)

Wageningen Economic Research, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Consulting Economist, Sandylands, Main Street, Shawell, LE17 6AG, United Kingdom.

Robert M'Barek (R)

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Seville, Spain.

Tévécia Ronzon (T)

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Seville, Spain.
Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Andrzej Tabeau (A)

Wageningen Economic Research, The Hague, the Netherlands.

Hans van Meijl (H)

Wageningen Economic Research, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH