The One Note System: Implementation and Initial Perceptions of Student Documentation in the Electronic Health Records Under the New Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Guidelines.

cms guidelines electronic health record note bloat patients over paperwork student documentation

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Aug 2020
Historique:
entrez: 14 9 2020
pubmed: 15 9 2020
medline: 15 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Introduction Medical students have been documenting notes in the electronic health records (EHR) for many years but often wrote separate notes from housestaff and faculty because licensed providers (LPs) could not bill the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for Evaluation and Management (E/M) services. However, in 2018, CMS updated its policy to allow LPs to simply verify any component of an E/M service under appropriate supervision, allowing LPs to bill a full medical student note. Methods At Virginia Commonwealth University Health Systems (VCUHS), a task force was formed to develop and pilot the One Note System (ONS), a system that incorporates the new CMS guidelines for certain note types. In June 2019, or 10 months after implementation of the ONS, the authors developed and distributed a survey that explored perceptions regarding the ONS among medical students, housestaff (residents and fellows), and faculty. Results The results showed that most participants were aware of the ONS and preferred email as the form of training. Overall, the ONS had a positive impact on faculty and housestaff workflow, improved self-reported faculty wellbeing, and increased meaning in student work. Only a minority reported barriers to implementing the ONS. Conclusions The One Note System was successfully implemented at VCUHS and positively received. Other outcomes to measure include impact of the ONS on student and trainee education, compliance and billing, quality and quantity of documentation, and faculty and housestaff burnout rates.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32923291
doi: 10.7759/cureus.9702
pmc: PMC7486093
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e9702

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020, Safdar et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Dec 6;165(11):753-760
pubmed: 27595430
Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(3):257-66
pubmed: 22775791
J Intern Med. 2018 Jun;283(6):516-529
pubmed: 29505159
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jan;24(1):63-8
pubmed: 18998191
Med Teach. 2019 Dec;41(12):1404-1410
pubmed: 31393190
Lancet. 2009 Nov 14;374(9702):1714-21
pubmed: 19914516
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Feb 22;170(4):377-80
pubmed: 20177042
JAMA. 2012 Aug 1;308(5):463-4
pubmed: 22851112
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Aug;28(8):1042-7
pubmed: 23595927

Auteurs

Komal Safdar (K)

Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

Evan M Dombrosky (EM)

Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

Claire Kimberly (C)

Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

Rebecca Miller (R)

Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

Adam M Garber (AM)

Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

Steven Bishop (S)

Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

Marieka Helou (M)

Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

Classifications MeSH