Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling in Preterm Deaths: A Validation Study.
Ethiopia
MITS
autopsy
newborn mortality
Journal
Global pediatric health
ISSN: 2333-794X
Titre abrégé: Glob Pediatr Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101670224
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
13
03
2020
revised:
23
06
2020
accepted:
31
07
2020
entrez:
14
9
2020
pubmed:
15
9
2020
medline:
15
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Uncertainty about the causes of neonatal deaths impedes achieving global health targets to reduce mortality. Complete diagnostic autopsy (CDA) is the gold standard to determine cause of death. However, it is often difficult to perform in high-burden, low-income settings. Validations of more feasible methods to determine cause of death are needed. This prospective, multi-center study in Ethiopia assessed the validity of the minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) approach to contribute to causes of death in preterm neonates compared to CDA. The MITS and CDA of 105 cases were reviewed. The MITS sampling success for lungs and liver was 100% and 84%, respectively. The kidney and brain had sampling successes of 58% each. MITS showed good agreement with CDA for the diagnosis of hyaline membrane disease (kappa = 0.78), and moderate to substantial agreement for pneumonia and pulmonary hemorrhage (kappa = 0.59 and 0.68, respectively). Even though CDA is the gold standard in identifying the cause of death, we believe that the MITS method can be a useful alternative method in supporting determination of cause of death in low-resource settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32923527
doi: 10.1177/2333794X20953263
pii: 10.1177_2333794X20953263
pmc: PMC7457683
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2333794X20953263Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2009;28(3):139-50
pubmed: 19365742
PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 22;13(11):e1002171
pubmed: 27875530
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 11;17(1):653
pubmed: 28800758
PLoS Med. 2017 Jun 20;14(6):e1002317
pubmed: 28632739
Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2010 Sep-Oct;13(5):362-8
pubmed: 20367214
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 30;10(6):e0132057
pubmed: 26126191
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Aug;7(8):e1130-e1138
pubmed: 31303299
Turk Patoloji Derg. 2013;29(2):122-6
pubmed: 23661349
Radiology. 2009 Mar;250(3):897-904
pubmed: 19244053
Med J Aust. 2004 Mar 15;180(6):281-5
pubmed: 15012566
Virchows Arch. 2008 Feb;452(2):201-7
pubmed: 18087719
Qual Assur Health Care. 1993 Dec;5(4):315-8
pubmed: 8018889
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2003 May;13(5):271-3
pubmed: 12757676
PLoS Med. 2018 Jan 10;15(1):e1002486
pubmed: 29320495
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2012 Sep;33(3):194-6
pubmed: 22543521
Med J Armed Forces India. 1999 Oct;55(4):331-333
pubmed: 28790603
Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1):1-4
pubmed: 21991941
Eur Radiol. 2016 Apr;26(4):1159-79
pubmed: 26210206
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;37(3):317-23
pubmed: 20878677
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 15;12(6):e0178200
pubmed: 28617835
Reprod Health. 2018 Jun 27;15(1):116
pubmed: 29945680
N Engl J Med. 1988 May 12;318(19):1249-54
pubmed: 3362177
Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Mar;84(3):239-45
pubmed: 16583084
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Jun;137(6):756-66
pubmed: 23721270
PLoS Med. 2017 Jun 20;14(6):e1002318
pubmed: 28632735
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;68(9):979-87
pubmed: 25770765
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33685
pubmed: 22432042
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571