Early Experience With Telemedicine in Patients Undergoing Otologic/Neurotologic Procedures.
Journal
Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
ISSN: 1537-4505
Titre abrégé: Otol Neurotol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100961504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
entrez:
14
9
2020
pubmed:
15
9
2020
medline:
15
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Compare outcomes for patients who were seen via telemedicine visits after otology/neurotology surgical procedures with those who were seen in traditional office visits. Retrospective case review. Tertiary care academic medical center. Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent otologic/neurotologic surgery and were seen in at least one telemedicine visit for postoperative care. Telemedicine visit for postoperative care. Comparison of the number of patient calls, unplanned visits, and delayed complications between telemedicine patients and controls matched for age, procedure, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status. Eighteen patients were seen in telemedicine visits postoperatively after the following otologic/neurotologic surgical procedures: cochlear implant surgery (10), vestibular schwannoma resection (4), combined middle fossa and transmastoid cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repair (2), middle fossa repair of superior canal dehiscence (1), and stapedectomy (1). All telehealth visits were for the second postoperative visit. The mean number of patient calls after surgery was 2.3 for the telemedicine group and 1.9 for matched controls which was not a statistically significant difference (p = 0.466). Both groups each had two patients who went to the emergency room, with one in each group being admitted. There was one delayed complication in the control group. Our preliminary experience suggests telemedicine may be used safely in caring for patients after otologic/neurotologic surgery, though it may be associated with more patient phone calls. Further study and experience, including assessing patient satisfaction, will clarify the future role of telemedicine in otology and neurotology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32925860
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002774
pii: 00129492-202010000-00032
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1154-e1157Références
Field MJ. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Evaluating Clinical Applications of TelemedicineNational Academies Press (US), Telemedicine: A Guide to Assessing Telecommunications in Health Care. Washington (DC):1996.
Armstrong DG, Giovinco N, Mills JL, et al. FaceTime for physicians: using real time mobile phone-based videoconferencing to augment diagnosis and care in telemedicine. Eplasty 2011; 11:e23.
Collins J, Dasgupta P, Kirby R, et al. Globalization of surgical expertise without losing the human touch: utilising the network, old and new. BJU Int 2012; 109:11291131.
Williams AM, Bhatti UF, Alam HB, Nikolian VC. The role of telemedicine in postoperative care. Mhealth 2018; 4:11.
Gunter RL, Chouinard S, Fernandes-Taylor S, et al. Current use of telemedicine for post-discharge surgical care: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 222:915927.
Park ES, Boedeker BH, Hemstreet JL, et al. The initiation of a preoperative and postoperative telemedicine urology clinic. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011; 163:425427.
Latifi R, Mora F, Bekteshi F, et al. Preoperative telemedicine evaluation of surgical mission patients: should we use it routinely? Bull Am Coll Surg 2014; 99:1723.
Hwa K, Wren SM. Telehealth follow-up in lieu of postoperative clinic visit for ambulatory surgery: results of a pilot program. JAMA Surg 2013; 148:823827.
Ellimoottil C, Skolarus T, Gettman M, et al. Telemedicine in urology: state of the art. Urology 2016; 94:1016.
Greiner AL. Telemedicine applications in obstetrics and gynecology. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2017; 60:853866.
Kahn EN, La Marca F, Mazzola CA. Neurosurgery and telemedicine in the United States: assessment of the risks and opportunities. World Neurosurg 2016; 89:133138.
Vyas KS, Hambrick HR, Shakir A, et al. A systematic review of the use of telemedicine in plastic and reconstructive surgery and dermatology. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78:736768.
Arriaga M, Nuss D, Arriaga RY. Neurotology telemedicine consultation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2011; 44:12351240.
Haegen TW, Cupp CC, Hunsaker DH. Teleotolaryngology: a retrospective review at a military tertiary treatment facility. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130:511518.
Kokesh J, Ferguson AS, Patricoski C. The Alaska experience using store-and-forward telemedicine for ENT care in Alaska. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2011; 44:13591374.