Comparison of dengue case classification schemes and evaluation of biological changes in different dengue clinical patterns in a longitudinal follow-up of hospitalized children in Cambodia.
Adolescent
Cambodia
Child
Child, Hospitalized
Child, Preschool
Cholesterol
/ blood
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disease Progression
Female
Humans
Male
Prospective Studies
Severe Dengue
/ classification
Severity of Illness Index
Triglycerides
/ blood
Viral Nonstructural Proteins
/ metabolism
World Health Organization
Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
Titre abrégé: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
12
09
2019
accepted:
14
07
2020
revised:
24
09
2020
pubmed:
15
9
2020
medline:
29
10
2020
entrez:
14
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The World Health Organization (WHO) proposed guidelines on dengue clinical classification in 1997 and more recently in 2009 for the clinical management of patients. The WHO 1997 classification defines three categories of dengue infection according to severity: dengue fever (DF), dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), and dengue shock syndrome (DSS). Alternative WHO 2009 guidelines provide a cross-sectional classification aiming to discriminate dengue fever from dengue with warning signs (DWWS) and severe dengue (SD). The primary objective of this study was to perform a comparison of two dengue classifications. The secondary objective was to describe the changes of hematological and biochemical parameters occurring in patients presenting with different degrees of severity during the course of the disease, since progression to more severe clinical forms is unpredictable. We performed a prospective, monocentric, cross-sectional study of hospitalized children in Cambodia, aged from 2 to 15 years old with severe and non-severe dengue. We enrolled 243 patients with acute dengue-like illness: 71.2% were dengue infections confirmed using quantitative reverse transcription PCR or NS1 antigen capture ELISA, of which 87.2% and 9.0% of DF cases were respectively classified DWWS and SD, and 35.9% of DHF were designated SD using an adapted WHO 2009 classification for SD case definition. Systematic use of ultrasound at patient admission was crucial for detecting plasma leakage. No difference was observed in the concentration of secreted NS1 protein between different dengue severity groups. Lipid profiles were different between DWWS and SD at admission, characterized by a decrease in total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol, in SD. Our results show discrepancies between the two classifications, including misclassification of severe dengue cases as mild cases by the WHO 1997 classification. Using an adapted WHO 2009 classification, SD more precisely defines the group of patients requiring careful clinical care at a given time during hospitalization.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The World Health Organization (WHO) proposed guidelines on dengue clinical classification in 1997 and more recently in 2009 for the clinical management of patients. The WHO 1997 classification defines three categories of dengue infection according to severity: dengue fever (DF), dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), and dengue shock syndrome (DSS). Alternative WHO 2009 guidelines provide a cross-sectional classification aiming to discriminate dengue fever from dengue with warning signs (DWWS) and severe dengue (SD). The primary objective of this study was to perform a comparison of two dengue classifications. The secondary objective was to describe the changes of hematological and biochemical parameters occurring in patients presenting with different degrees of severity during the course of the disease, since progression to more severe clinical forms is unpredictable.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
We performed a prospective, monocentric, cross-sectional study of hospitalized children in Cambodia, aged from 2 to 15 years old with severe and non-severe dengue. We enrolled 243 patients with acute dengue-like illness: 71.2% were dengue infections confirmed using quantitative reverse transcription PCR or NS1 antigen capture ELISA, of which 87.2% and 9.0% of DF cases were respectively classified DWWS and SD, and 35.9% of DHF were designated SD using an adapted WHO 2009 classification for SD case definition. Systematic use of ultrasound at patient admission was crucial for detecting plasma leakage. No difference was observed in the concentration of secreted NS1 protein between different dengue severity groups. Lipid profiles were different between DWWS and SD at admission, characterized by a decrease in total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol, in SD.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE
Our results show discrepancies between the two classifications, including misclassification of severe dengue cases as mild cases by the WHO 1997 classification. Using an adapted WHO 2009 classification, SD more precisely defines the group of patients requiring careful clinical care at a given time during hospitalization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32925941
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008603
pii: PNTD-D-19-01549
pmc: PMC7515206
doi:
Substances chimiques
NS1 protein, dengue-1 virus
0
Triglycerides
0
Viral Nonstructural Proteins
0
Cholesterol
97C5T2UQ7J
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0008603Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 208710/Z/17/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Dr. Philippe Buchy is a former Head of Virology at Institut Pasteur du Cambodge and is currently an employee of GSK Vaccines, Singapore. The other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Sep 21;61:737-40
pubmed: 22992571
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Sep 03;9(9):e0003904
pubmed: 26334914
J Clin Ultrasound. 2004 Oct;32(8):386-8
pubmed: 15372445
Rev Med Virol. 2018 Jul;28(4):e1979
pubmed: 29691914
Int Health. 2009 Dec;1(2):133-40
pubmed: 24036557
Euro Surveill. 2016 May 26;21(21):
pubmed: 27254392
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 10;108(19):8003-8
pubmed: 21518917
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018 Nov 02;8:388
pubmed: 30450339
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Sep 1;88(9):650-7
pubmed: 20865069
J Virol Methods. 2011 Nov;177(2):168-73
pubmed: 21843553
Arch Virol. 2015 Jul;160(7):1687-92
pubmed: 25936955
Trop Med Int Health. 2011 Aug;16(8):936-48
pubmed: 21624014
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013 Dec;13(12):835-45
pubmed: 24107180
J Infect Dis. 1997 Aug;176(2):313-21
pubmed: 9237695
Res Virol. 1998 Jul-Aug;149(4):235-8
pubmed: 9783339
J Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 1;214(7):986-93
pubmed: 26984144
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Feb;70(2):172-9
pubmed: 14993629
Nature. 2013 Apr 25;496(7446):504-7
pubmed: 23563266
Lancet. 2006 Jul 8;368(9530):170-3
pubmed: 16829301
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1958 Sep;7(5):561-73
pubmed: 13571577
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Dec 7;10(12):e0005149
pubmed: 27926937
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Mar;78(3):370-4
pubmed: 18337328
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007 Apr;26(4):283-90; discussion 291-2
pubmed: 17414388
Clin Chem. 1972 Jun;18(6):499-502
pubmed: 4337382
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Apr 15;34(8):1150-3
pubmed: 11915007
Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Aug;11(8):1238-55
pubmed: 16903887
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014 Jul;91(1):138-45
pubmed: 24865681
J Virol Methods. 2005 Mar;124(1-2):65-71
pubmed: 15664052
BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Apr 21;11:106
pubmed: 21510901
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Sep 25;9(9):e0004100
pubmed: 26406240
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2010 Sep;41(5):1088-94
pubmed: 21073029
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014 Jul 14;8(7):869-75
pubmed: 25022297
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 12;366(15):1423-32
pubmed: 22494122
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014 Sep;91(3):621-634
pubmed: 24957540
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Oct;83(4):774-80
pubmed: 20889864
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Nov 30;4(11):e903
pubmed: 21152061
J Trop Pediatr. 2000 Jun;46(3):179-81
pubmed: 10893923
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Jan;86(1):166-70
pubmed: 22232468
Science. 1988 Jan 29;239(4839):476-81
pubmed: 3277268
Lancet Infect Dis. 2006 May;6(5):297-302
pubmed: 16631550
Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Jan 1;89(1):46-53
pubmed: 21346890
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2015;62(5):238-50
pubmed: 26118707