Haemodynamic activity characterization of resting state networks by fractal analysis and thalamocortical morphofunctional integrity in chronic migraine.
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)
Fractal analysis (FA)
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
Higuchi’s fractal dimension (FD)
Migraine and chronic
Resting state networks (RSN)
Journal
The journal of headache and pain
ISSN: 1129-2377
Titre abrégé: J Headache Pain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100940562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Sep 2020
14 Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
01
07
2020
accepted:
08
09
2020
entrez:
15
9
2020
pubmed:
16
9
2020
medline:
22
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Chronic migraine (CM) can be associated with aberrant long-range connectivity of MRI-derived resting-state networks (RSNs). Here, we investigated how the fractal dimension (FD) of blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) activity may be used to estimate the complexity of RSNs, reflecting flexibility and/or efficiency in information processing in CM patients respect to healthy controls (HC). Resting-state MRI data were collected from 20 untreated CM without history of medication overuse and 20 HC. On both groups, we estimated the Higuchi's FD. On the same subjects, fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) values of bilateral thalami were retrieved from diffusion tensor imaging and correlated with the FD values. CM showed higher FD values within dorsal attention system (DAS) and the anterior part of default-mode network (DMN), and lower FD values within the posterior DMN compared to HC. Although FA and MD were within the range of normality, both correlated with the FD values of DAS. FD of DAS and DMN may reflect disruption of cognitive control of pain in CM. Since the normal microstructure of the thalamus and its positive connectivity with the cortical networking found in our CM patients reminds similar results obtained assessing the same structures but with the methods of neurophysiology, in episodic migraine during an attack, this may be yet another evidence in supporting CM as a never-ending migraine attack.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Chronic migraine (CM) can be associated with aberrant long-range connectivity of MRI-derived resting-state networks (RSNs). Here, we investigated how the fractal dimension (FD) of blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) activity may be used to estimate the complexity of RSNs, reflecting flexibility and/or efficiency in information processing in CM patients respect to healthy controls (HC).
METHODS
METHODS
Resting-state MRI data were collected from 20 untreated CM without history of medication overuse and 20 HC. On both groups, we estimated the Higuchi's FD. On the same subjects, fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) values of bilateral thalami were retrieved from diffusion tensor imaging and correlated with the FD values.
RESULTS
RESULTS
CM showed higher FD values within dorsal attention system (DAS) and the anterior part of default-mode network (DMN), and lower FD values within the posterior DMN compared to HC. Although FA and MD were within the range of normality, both correlated with the FD values of DAS.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
FD of DAS and DMN may reflect disruption of cognitive control of pain in CM. Since the normal microstructure of the thalamus and its positive connectivity with the cortical networking found in our CM patients reminds similar results obtained assessing the same structures but with the methods of neurophysiology, in episodic migraine during an attack, this may be yet another evidence in supporting CM as a never-ending migraine attack.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32928129
doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01181-8
pii: 10.1186/s10194-020-01181-8
pmc: PMC7490862
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
112Références
J Headache Pain. 2017 Dec 8;18(1):115
pubmed: 29322264
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
pubmed: 11994752
Mol Pain. 2017 Jan-Dec;13:1744806917737461
pubmed: 28969471
Neurology. 2016 Nov 15;87(20):2154-2160
pubmed: 27742813
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Nov;17(3):143-55
pubmed: 12391568
Eur J Neurol. 2014 Feb;21(2):287-e13
pubmed: 24200371
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct;116(10):2266-301
pubmed: 16115797
Hum Brain Mapp. 2001 May;13(1):43-53
pubmed: 11284046
MAGMA. 2014 Aug;27(4):291-301
pubmed: 24287715
J Headache Pain. 2013 Nov 08;14:89
pubmed: 24207164
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Sep;34(9):2228-43
pubmed: 22438291
Ann Neurol. 2010 Jul;68(1):81-91
pubmed: 20582997
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0149587
pubmed: 26872349
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Jan;25(1):74-86
pubmed: 22905821
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Feb;21(2):137-149
pubmed: 28063662
Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):870-88
pubmed: 14568458
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Feb 19;99 Suppl 1:2466-72
pubmed: 11875196
PLoS Med. 2006 Oct;3(10):e402
pubmed: 17048979
Neuroimage. 2019 Jan 1;184:801-812
pubmed: 30267859
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):676-82
pubmed: 11209064
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9673-8
pubmed: 15976020
Neuroscientist. 2015 Feb;21(1):30-43
pubmed: 24362814
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 3;112(44):13687-92
pubmed: 26460033
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Apr;35(4):1461-8
pubmed: 23450507
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Jun 18;19:948-962
pubmed: 30003032
Neurology. 2019 May 28;92(22):e2550-e2558
pubmed: 31053665
J Headache Pain. 2016 Dec;17(1):100
pubmed: 27778244
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Jul 22;16:196-204
pubmed: 28794980
J Neurophysiol. 2007 May;97(5):3651-9
pubmed: 17314240
Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):825-41
pubmed: 12377157
Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Jun 1;67(11):1083-90
pubmed: 20303069
Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Apr;131(4):880-886
pubmed: 32070811
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;120(2):436-48
pubmed: 19109060
Pain. 2003 Nov;106(1-2):81-9
pubmed: 14581114
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Aug 1;40(11):3299-3320
pubmed: 31090254
Neurobiol Aging. 2002 Jan-Feb;23(1):23-6
pubmed: 11755014
J Neurol. 2020 Jan;267(1):185-191
pubmed: 31606759
Neuron. 2016 Apr 6;90(1):152-164
pubmed: 26996084
J Headache Pain. 2013 Sep 09;14:76
pubmed: 24016158
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Sep;8(9):700-11
pubmed: 17704812
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15;125:1063-1078
pubmed: 26481672
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:1-38
pubmed: 18400922
Front Neurol. 2018 Jan 30;9:25
pubmed: 29441041
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Apr;15(4):264-78
pubmed: 24569488
J Biol Phys. 2010 Mar;36(2):185-96
pubmed: 19669909
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Mar;24(3):663-76
pubmed: 23146964
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Apr 1;40(5):1445-1457
pubmed: 30430697
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 3;9(1):18213
pubmed: 31796805
Front Neurol. 2020 Jan 09;10:1356
pubmed: 31998217
Front Neuroinform. 2009 Jul 15;3:18
pubmed: 19636388
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016 Sep;133:55-70
pubmed: 27393800