Duration Selectivity in Right Parietal Cortex Reflects the Subjective Experience of Time.
adaptation
duration aftereffects
fMRI
parietal cortex
time perception
Journal
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
ISSN: 1529-2401
Titre abrégé: J Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8102140
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 09 2020
30 09 2020
Historique:
received:
12
01
2020
revised:
09
06
2020
accepted:
04
08
2020
pubmed:
16
9
2020
medline:
16
1
2021
entrez:
15
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The perception of duration in the subsecond range has been hypothesized to be mediated by the population response of duration-sensitive units, each tuned to a preferred duration. One line of support for this hypothesis comes from neuroimaging studies showing that cortical regions, such as in parietal cortex exhibit duration tuning. It remains unclear whether this representation is based on the physical duration of the sensory input or the subjective duration, a question that is important given that our perception of the passage of time is often not veridical, but rather, biased by various contextual factors. Here we used fMRI to examine the neural correlates of subjective time perception in human participants. To manipulate perceived duration while holding physical duration constant, we used an adaptation method, in which, before judging the duration of a test stimulus, the participants were exposed to a train of adapting stimuli of a fixed duration. Behaviorally, this procedure produced a pronounced negative aftereffect: A short adaptor biased participants to judge stimuli as longer and a long adaptor-biased participants to judge stimuli as shorter. Duration tuning modulation, manifest as an attenuated BOLD response to stimuli similar in duration to the adaptor, was only observed in the right supramarginal gyrus (SMG) of the parietal lobe and middle occipital gyrus, bilaterally. Across individuals, the magnitude of the behavioral aftereffect was positively correlated with the magnitude of duration tuning modulation in SMG. These results indicate that duration-tuned neural populations in right SMG reflect the subjective experience of time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32928883
pii: JNEUROSCI.0078-20.2020
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0078-20.2020
pmc: PMC7531545
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7749-7758Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS092079
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS105839
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R35 NS116883
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Hayashi and Ivry.
Références
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1996 Dec;6(6):851-7
pubmed: 9000026
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016 Apr;8:282-288
pubmed: 27088121
Nature. 2001 Nov 15;414(6861):302-5
pubmed: 11713528
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Jul;8(7):950-4
pubmed: 15965472
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jan;51(2):309-19
pubmed: 22964490
Curr Biol. 2020 Apr 20;30(8):1424-1434.e6
pubmed: 32142704
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Mar;103(3):1410-7
pubmed: 20071633
J Neurosci. 1998 Feb 1;18(3):1085-95
pubmed: 9437028
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Nov 7;279(1746):4399-406
pubmed: 22951740
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Oct;6(10):755-65
pubmed: 16163383
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 09;6:1536
pubmed: 26500591
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 05;8:491
pubmed: 28424646
Psychol Monogr. 1963;77(13):1-31
pubmed: 5877542
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1728-40
pubmed: 19800975
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Aug;26(8):1685-93
pubmed: 24456398
Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 09;5:10124
pubmed: 26054927
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Jul;8(7):522-35
pubmed: 17585305
PLoS Biol. 2019 Mar 21;17(3):e3000026
pubmed: 30897088
Neuron. 2001 Oct 11;32(1):161-72
pubmed: 11604147
J Vis. 2008 Dec 22;8(16):11.1-6
pubmed: 19146277
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Apr;10(4):423-5
pubmed: 17369824
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Feb;121(2):109-24
pubmed: 16095549
Vision Res. 2017 Jan;130:67-75
pubmed: 27876514
Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Dec 27;5:91
pubmed: 22207841
Front Psychol. 2013 Jan 10;3:606
pubmed: 23335907
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Oct 3;371:111954
pubmed: 31121218
Curr Biol. 2006 Mar 7;16(5):472-9
pubmed: 16527741
Percept Psychophys. 2004 Oct;66(7):1171-89
pubmed: 15751474
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Jul;149(7):1333-1343
pubmed: 31789572
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Jun 03;15(7):957-9
pubmed: 22660480
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 09;7:114
pubmed: 26903920
Commun Biol. 2018 Dec 21;1:233
pubmed: 30588512
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jul 27;283(1835):
pubmed: 27466452
PLoS Biol. 2015 Sep 17;13(9):e1002262
pubmed: 26378440
J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 16;33(3):883-93
pubmed: 23325227
J Neurosci. 2012 Aug 29;32(35):12258-67
pubmed: 22933807
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Feb;10(2):113-25
pubmed: 19145235
Trends Neurosci. 2006 May;29(5):250-6
pubmed: 16529826
J Vis. 2006 Dec 15;6(12):1421-30
pubmed: 17209745
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jan;22(1):23-31
pubmed: 19199426
J Vis. 2009 Jul 22;9(7):14
pubmed: 19761329
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:143-151
pubmed: 27939922
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Aug;13(8):1020-6
pubmed: 20581842
Neurosci Lett. 2013 May 24;543:7-11
pubmed: 23562517
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Feb 22;279(1729):690-8
pubmed: 21831897
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 28;9(1):3016
pubmed: 30816131
Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 21;9(1):3854
pubmed: 30242150
Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 1;37(1):300-10
pubmed: 17561416
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jan;10(1):14-23
pubmed: 16321563
Neuroimage. 2016 Aug 1;136:149-61
pubmed: 27164327
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jun;20(6):1054-62
pubmed: 18211231
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Nov;48(13):3967-71
pubmed: 20863842