Trainer-exerciser relationship: The congruency effect on exerciser psychological needs using response surface analysis.
basic needs
exercisers
fitness professionals
interpersonal behaviors
response surface analysis
Journal
Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports
ISSN: 1600-0838
Titre abrégé: Scand J Med Sci Sports
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 9111504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
15
01
2020
revised:
27
07
2020
accepted:
04
09
2020
pubmed:
16
9
2020
medline:
4
5
2021
entrez:
15
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Perceptions of fitness trainers' need-supportive and need-thwarting behaviors have been shown to impact exercisers' psychological need satisfaction and frustration. Currently, it is unknown whether an agreement or disagreement between exercisers' and fitness trainers' reported perceptions of these behaviors leads to the satisfaction and/or frustration of psychological needs. Based on self-determination theory, the present study examined the effect of congruency between fitness trainers' and exercisers' perceptions of need-supportive and need-thwarting interpersonal behaviors on basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration. A sample of 130 fitness trainers (43 females; M
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
226-241Subventions
Organisme : Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
ID : UID04045/2020
Informations de copyright
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Teixeira P, Carraca E, Markland D, Silva M, Ryan R. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Beha Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:78.
Rodrigues F, Teixeira DS, Neiva HP, Cid L, Monteiro D. The bright and dark sides of motivation as predictors of enjoyment, intention, and exercise persistence. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020;30:787-800.
Sibley BA, Bergman SM. What keeps athletes in the gym? Goals, psychological needs, and motivation of CrossFit™ participants. Int J Sport Exer Psych. 2018;16:555-574.
Humberg S, Nestler S, Back M. Response surface analysis in personality and social psychology: checklist and clarifications for the case of congruence hypotheses. Soc Psych Person Sci. 2018;10:409-419.
Ryan R, Deci E. Self-Determination Theory. Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York, NY: Guildford Press; 2017.
Bartholomew K, Ntoumanis N, Ryan R, Bosch J, Thogersen-Ntoumani C. Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: the role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Persona Socl Psych Bull. 2011;37:1459-1473.
Vansteenkiste M, Ryan RM. On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. J Psychother Integ. 2013;23:263-280.
Vansteenkiste M, Ryan RM, Soenens B. Basic psychological need theory: advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Mot Emo. 2020;44:1-31.
Warburton V, Wang J, Bartholomew K, Tuff R, Bishop K. Need satisfaction and need frustration as distinct and potentially co-occurring constructs: need profiles examined in physical education and sport. Mot Emo. 2020;44(1):54-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09798-2
Ntoumanis N, Thogersen-Ntoumani C, Quested E, Hancox J. The effects of training group exercise class instructors to adopt a motivationally adaptive communication style. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27:1026-1034.
Rodrigues F, Pelletier L, Neiva H, Teixeira D, Cid L, Monteiro D. Initial validation of the Portuguese version of the Interpersonal Behavior Questionnaire (IBQ & IBQ-Self) in the context of exercise: measurement invariance and latent mean differences. CurPsycho. 2019:1-12.
Rocchi M, Pelletier L, Cheung S, Baxter D, Beaudry S. Assessing need-supportive and need-thwarting interpersonal behaviours: the interpersonal behaviours questionnaire (IBQ). Person Indi Dif. 2017;104:423-433.
Costa S, Ntoumanis N, Bartholomew K. Predicting the brighter and darker sides of interpersonal relationships: does psychological need thwarting matter? Motiv Emo. 2014;39:11-24.
Conroy DE, Coatsworth JD. Assessing autonomy-supportive coaching Strategies in Youth Sport. Psycho Sport Exer. 2007;8:671-684.
Rocchi M, Pelletier L. The antecedents of coaches' interpersonal behaviors: the role of the coaching context, coaches' psychological needs, and coaches' motivation. J Sport Exer Psycho. 2017;39:366-378.
Stebbings J, Taylor I, Spray C. Antecedents of perceived coach autonomy supportive and controlling behaviors: coach psychological need satisfaction and well-being. J Sport Exer Psycho. 2011;33:255-272.
Rocchi M, Pelletier L. How does coaches' reported interpersonal behavior align with athletes' perceptions? Consequences for female athletes' psychological needs in sport. Sport Exer Perf Psych. 2018;7:141-154.
Horn TS. Coaching Effectiveness in the Sport Domain. Advances in Sport Psychology. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2008:239-267, 455-459.
Ntoumanis N, Guerrero MD, Gadeke C, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C. Do exerciser weight status and perceived motivation predict instructors' motivation and beliefs about the exerciser? A test of motivation contagion effects. Body Image. 2018;26:10-18.
Edwards J. Polynomial regression and response surface methodology. In: Ostroff C, Judge A, eds. Perspectives on Organizational Fit. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007:361-372.
Gjesdal S, Stenling A, Solstad B, Ommundsen Y. A study of coach-team perceptual distance concerning the coach-created motivational climate in youth sport. Scandinavian J Med Sci Sports. 2018;29:132-143.
Bean C, Forneris T, Brunet J. Investigating discrepancies in program quality related to youth volleyball athletes' needs support. Psycho Sport Exer. 2016;26:154-163.
Ntoumanis N. A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Motivation in Sport and Physical Education: Current Trends and Possible Future Research Directions. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2012:91-128.
Nestler S, Humberg S, Schönbrodt F. Response surface analysis with multilevel data: illustration for the case of congruence hypotheses. Psychol Methods. 2019;24(3):291-308. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000199
Blanchard C, Amiot C, Perreault S, Vallerand R, Provencher P. Cohesiveness, coach's interpersonal style and psychological needs: their effects on self-determination and athletes' subjective well-being. Psychol Sport Exerci. 2009;10(5):545-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.02.005
Hollembeak J, Amorose A. Perceived coaching behaviors and college athletes' intrinsic motivation: a test of self-determination theory. J App Sport Psycho. 2005;17(1):20-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200590907540
Rocchi M, Pelletier L, Desmarais P. The validity of the interpersonal behaviors questionnaire (IBQ) in sport. Measure Phys Educ Exer Sci. 2016;21:15-25.
Rodrigues F, Hair J, Neiva H, Teixeira D, Cid L, Monteiro D. The basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration scale in exercise (BPNSFS-E): validity, reliability, and fender invariance in Portuguese exercisers. Percept Motor Skills. 2019;126(5):949-972.
Chen B, Vansteenkiste M, Beyers W, et al. Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Mot Emo. 2015;39:216-236.
Gravetter F, Wallnau L. Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences. 8th ed. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning; 2014.
Raykov T, Gabler S, Dimitrov D. Maximal reliability and composite reliability: examining their difference for multicomponent measuring instruments using latent variable modeling. Struct Equ Mod. 2015;23:384-391.
Cham H, Reshetnyak E, Rosenfeld B, Breitbart W. Full information maximum likelihood estimation for latent variable interactions with incomplete indicators. Multi Beha Research. 2017;52:12-30.
Muthén L, Muthén B. Mplus User's Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2010.
Gibson C, Cooper CD, Conger JA. Do you see what we see? The complex effects of perceptual distance between leaders and teams. Develop Learn Org: An Int Journal. 2009;94(1):62-76.
Fleenor JW, McCauley CD, Brutus S. Self-other rating agreement and leader effectiveness. Lead Quart. 1996;7:487-506.
Atwater L, Ostroff C, Yammarino F, Fleenor J. Self-other agreement: does it really matter? Person Psycho. 2006;51(3):577-598.
Fleenor JW, Smither JW, Atwater LE, Braddy PW, Sturm RE. Self-other rating agreement in leadership: a review. Lead Quart. 2010;21:1005-1034.
Fox J. Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models. CA: Sage; 2016.
Lacobucci D, Schneider MJ, Popovich DL, Bakamitsos GA. Mean centering helps alleviate “micro” but not “macro” multicollinearity. Beha Research Meth. 2016;48:1308-1317.
Preacher K, Zyphur MJ, Zhang Z. A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychol Methods. 2010;15(3):209-233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020141
Bound J, Brown C, Mathiowetz N. Measurement error in survey data. In: Heckman JJ, Leamer EE, eds. Handbook of Econometrics. Elsevier; 2001:3705-3843.
Haerens L, Vansteenkiste M, Aelterman N, Van den Berghe L. Toward a systematic study of the dark side of student motivation: antecedents and consequences of teachers' controlling behaviors. In: Liu WC, Wang JCK, Ryan RM, eds. Building Autonomous Learners: Perspectives from Research and Practice using Self-Determination Theory. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2016:59-81.
Atwater L, Yammarino F. Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions? Person Psycho. 1992;45:141-164.
Jowett S, Adie J, Bartholomew K, Yang S, Gustafsson H, Lopez-Jiménez A. Motivational processes in the coach-athlete relationship: a multi-cultural self-determination approach. Psycho Sport Exer. 2017;32:143-152.
Jackson B, Dimmock JA, Gucciardi DF, Grove JR. Personality traits and relationship perceptions in coach-athlete dyads: do opposites really attract? Psycho Sport Exer. 2011;12:222-230.