Cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: outcomes from a specialist clinic in the UK.
Evidence-based practice
mood disorders (including depression)
other psychiatry
psychotherapy
somatoform disorders
Journal
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
ISSN: 1758-1095
Titre abrégé: J R Soc Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7802879
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
16
9
2020
medline:
23
12
2020
entrez:
15
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cognitive behavioural therapy is commonly used to treat chronic fatigue syndrome and has been shown to be effective for reducing fatigue and improving physical functioning. Most of the evidence on the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome is from randomised control trials, but there are only a few studies in naturalistic treatment settings. Our aim was to examine the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in a naturalistic setting and examine what factors, if any, predicted outcome. Using linear mixed effects analysis, we analysed patients' self-reported symptomology over the course of treatment and at three-month follow-up. Furthermore, we explored what baseline factors were associated with improvement at follow-up. Data were available for 995 patients receiving cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome at an outpatient clinic in the UK. Participants were referred consecutively to a specialist unit for chronic fatigue or chronic fatigue syndrome. Patients were assessed throughout their treatment using self-report measures including the Chalder Fatigue Scale, 36-item Short Form Health Survey, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Global Improvement and Satisfaction. Patients' fatigue, physical functioning and social adjustment scores significantly improved over the duration of treatment with medium to large effect sizes (|d| = 0.45-0.91). Furthermore, 85% of patients self-reported that they felt an improvement in their fatigue at follow-up and 90% were satisfied with their treatment. None of the regression models convincingly predicted improvement in outcomes with the best model being (R Patients' fatigue, physical functioning and social adjustment all significantly improved following cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in a naturalistic outpatient setting. These findings support the growing evidence from previous randomised control trials and suggest that cognitive behavioural therapy could be an effective treatment in routine treatment settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32930040
doi: 10.1177/0141076820951545
pmc: PMC7583448
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
394-402Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Behav Res Ther. 2014 Dec;63:1-8
pubmed: 25222752
Psychol Med. 2013 Feb;43(2):375-80
pubmed: 22571806
Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Mar;154(3):408-14
pubmed: 9054791
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;199(5):430-1
pubmed: 21903665
Lancet. 2011 Mar 5;377(9768):823-36
pubmed: 21334061
J Psychosom Res. 2011 Sep;71(3):124-8
pubmed: 21843745
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Psychother Psychosom. 2007;76(3):171-6
pubmed: 17426416
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;181:248-52
pubmed: 12204931
Psychol Med. 2014 Apr;44(6):1331-44
pubmed: 23931831
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1105-13
pubmed: 9817128
BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 07;4(2):e003973
pubmed: 24508851
QJM. 2013 Jun;106(6):555-65
pubmed: 23538643
Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;186:350-1
pubmed: 15802694
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Jun;28(5):736-45
pubmed: 18060672
BMJ. 1994 Mar 19;308(6931):763-6
pubmed: 7908238
J Psychosom Res. 2017 Jun;97:45-51
pubmed: 28606498
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Jun;45(6):1085-94
pubmed: 17074300
Psychother Res. 2011 Mar;21(2):168-78
pubmed: 21271461
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD001027
pubmed: 18646067
J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77
pubmed: 11832252
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Dec 15;121(12):953-9
pubmed: 7978722
J Affect Disord. 2010 Oct;126(1-2):174-9
pubmed: 20167377
J Psychosom Res. 2010 Jul;69(1):17-22
pubmed: 20630259
J R Soc Med. 1991 Feb;84(2):118-21
pubmed: 1999813
J Psychosom Res. 1993;37(2):147-53
pubmed: 8463991