Higher Adenoma Detection Rates at Screening Associated With Lower Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality.


Journal

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
ISSN: 1542-7714
Titre abrégé: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101160775

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2022
Historique:
received: 02 09 2020
accepted: 09 09 2020
pubmed: 16 9 2020
medline: 17 3 2022
entrez: 15 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Detection and removal of adenomas reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. The impact of adenoma detection rates (ADRs) on long-term CRC incidence and mortality is unknown. We investigated this using data from the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial. Of 167,882 UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial participants, 40,085 were in the intervention arm and underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy screening at 13 trial centers. The median follow-up time was 17 years. At each center, 1 endoscopist performed most flexible sigmoidoscopies. Multivariable logistic regression was used to classify centers into high-, intermediate-, and low-detector groups based on their main endoscopist's ADR. We calculated the incidence and mortality of distal and all-site CRC, and estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs using Cox regression. Five, 4, and 4 centers, respectively, were classified into the high-detector, intermediate-detector, and low-detector groups. The average ADRs in each respective group were 15%, 12%, and 9%. Distal CRC incidence and mortality were reduced among those screened compared with controls in all groups, and effects of screening varied significantly by detector ranking, with larger reductions in incidence and mortality seen in the high-detector group (incidence: HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.27-0.42; mortality: HR, 0.22, 95% CI, 0.13-0.37) than in the low-detector group (incidence: HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.68; mortality: HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34-0.86). Similar results were observed for all-site CRC, with larger effects seen in the high-detector (incidence: HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.50-0.67; mortality: HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39-0.69) than in the low-detector group (incidence: HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.85; mortality: HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92), although the heterogeneity was not statistically significant. Higher ADRs at screening provide greater long-term protection against CRC incidence and mortality. Isrctn.org, number: ISRCTN28352761.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND & AIMS
Detection and removal of adenomas reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. The impact of adenoma detection rates (ADRs) on long-term CRC incidence and mortality is unknown. We investigated this using data from the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial.
METHODS
Of 167,882 UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial participants, 40,085 were in the intervention arm and underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy screening at 13 trial centers. The median follow-up time was 17 years. At each center, 1 endoscopist performed most flexible sigmoidoscopies. Multivariable logistic regression was used to classify centers into high-, intermediate-, and low-detector groups based on their main endoscopist's ADR. We calculated the incidence and mortality of distal and all-site CRC, and estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs using Cox regression.
RESULTS
Five, 4, and 4 centers, respectively, were classified into the high-detector, intermediate-detector, and low-detector groups. The average ADRs in each respective group were 15%, 12%, and 9%. Distal CRC incidence and mortality were reduced among those screened compared with controls in all groups, and effects of screening varied significantly by detector ranking, with larger reductions in incidence and mortality seen in the high-detector group (incidence: HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.27-0.42; mortality: HR, 0.22, 95% CI, 0.13-0.37) than in the low-detector group (incidence: HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.68; mortality: HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34-0.86). Similar results were observed for all-site CRC, with larger effects seen in the high-detector (incidence: HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.50-0.67; mortality: HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39-0.69) than in the low-detector group (incidence: HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.85; mortality: HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92), although the heterogeneity was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS
Higher ADRs at screening provide greater long-term protection against CRC incidence and mortality. Isrctn.org, number: ISRCTN28352761.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32931959
pii: S1542-3565(20)31280-5
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.020
pmc: PMC8811539
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ISRCTN
['ISRCTN28352761']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e148-e167

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 16/65/01
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C53889/A25004
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Gastroenterology. 2008 May;134(5):1570-95
pubmed: 18384785
Stat Med. 1997 May 15;16(9):1017-29
pubmed: 9160496
Gut. 2016 Dec;65(12):1923-1929
pubmed: 27531829
Lancet. 2017 Apr 1;389(10076):1299-1311
pubmed: 28236467
Gastroenterology. 2017 Jul;153(1):98-105
pubmed: 28428142
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jan;91(1):135-141
pubmed: 31499041
N Engl J Med. 1992 Mar 5;326(10):658-62
pubmed: 1736104
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Aug;92(2):355-364.e5
pubmed: 32092289
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;113(12):1855-1861
pubmed: 30072776
Gastroenterology. 2018 Oct;155(4):1059-1068.e2
pubmed: 29935150
N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306
pubmed: 24693890
Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):356-66.e1
pubmed: 25911510
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1795-803
pubmed: 20463339
Gastroenterology. 2004 May;126(5):1247-56
pubmed: 15131784
Lancet. 2010 May 8;375(9726):1624-33
pubmed: 20430429
BMJ. 2017 Jan 13;356:i6673
pubmed: 28087510
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;4(3):239-247
pubmed: 30655218
Lancet. 2002 Apr 13;359(9314):1291-300
pubmed: 11965274
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jan;11(1):73-8
pubmed: 22902761
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Aug;88(2):209-222.e11
pubmed: 29614263

Auteurs

Amanda J Cross (AJ)

Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: amanda.cross1@imperial.ac.uk.

Emma C Robbins (EC)

Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Brian P Saunders (BP)

Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Stephen W Duffy (SW)

Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom.

Kate Wooldrage (K)

Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH