Does articaine, rather than prilocaine, increase the success rate of anaesthesia for extraction of maxillary teeth.
Carticaine
dental extraction
injections
prilocaine
Journal
Saudi journal of anaesthesia
ISSN: 1658-354X
Titre abrégé: Saudi J Anaesth
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101500601
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
02
02
2020
revised:
03
03
2020
accepted:
17
03
2020
entrez:
16
9
2020
pubmed:
17
9
2020
medline:
17
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the anesthetic performances of 3% prilocaine and 4% articaine when used for the extraction of the maxillary teeth. Ninety-five patients, aged between 16 and 70 years, were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups. Group one received articaine 4% with 1:00.000 adrenaline. Group two received prilocaine with 3% felypressin (0.03 I.U. per ml). Onset time of anesthesia was objectively evaluated by using electronic pulp testing. Eighty-five patients in this study had a successful local anesthetic followed by extraction within the study duration time (10 minutes). However, there were six patients with failure anesthesia (5 in prilocaine group and 1 in articaine group). By applying Person's Chi-square test (x2), there were no significant differences in the number of episodes of the anesthetic success between articaine and prilocaine groups at time intervals ( 3% Prilocaine with felypressin is as effective as 4% articaine with adrenaline when used for the extraction of maxillary teeth. Recommendations would be given to the dental practitioners to use prilocaine more frequently than articaine because of its low toxicity. NCT04236115.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32934619
doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_94_20
pii: SJA-14-297
pmc: PMC7458028
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04236115']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
297-301Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2020 Saudi Journal of Anesthesia.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec;119(6):486-488
pubmed: 29936238
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jun;15(2):63-68
pubmed: 28879260
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 May;28(3):335-344
pubmed: 29573375
J Endod. 2018 Oct;44(10):1462-1466
pubmed: 30174101
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Jul 01;17(4):e655-60
pubmed: 22322521
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Sep;68(9):1242-7
pubmed: 26049614
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2018 May-Jun;22(3):243-248
pubmed: 29962704
Saudi Med J. 2019 Jan;40(1):97-100
pubmed: 30617388
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;56(7):607-610
pubmed: 29980352
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2018 Sep 30;9(3):e5
pubmed: 30429965
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jun;18(3):143-149
pubmed: 29984318
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2018 Apr;39(4):256-257
pubmed: 29600874
Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Jan-Mar;10(1):81-6
pubmed: 26955316
Saudi J Anaesth. 2020 Jan-Mar;14(1):57-62
pubmed: 31998021
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug;76(8):1652.e1-1652.e7
pubmed: 29758175
Saudi J Anaesth. 2018 Oct-Dec;12(4):571-577
pubmed: 30429739
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018 Spring;12(2):97-101
pubmed: 30087759
Anesth Prog. 2010 Summer;57(2):45-51
pubmed: 20553134
Anesth Prog. 2017 Winter;64(4):203-211
pubmed: 29200372
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):152-157
pubmed: 28442952
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 10;7:CD006487
pubmed: 29990391
J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):1912-6
pubmed: 25218523
SAAD Dig. 2016 Jan;32:7-13
pubmed: 27145553
Glob J Health Sci. 2016 Feb 25;8(10):54157
pubmed: 27302432
Saudi Med J. 2019 May;40(5):425
pubmed: 31056616
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Jan 1;18(1):57-59
pubmed: 28050987
Anesth Prog. 1990 Sep-Oct;37(5):230-7
pubmed: 2096746
Saudi J Anaesth. 2015 Oct-Dec;9(4):397-403
pubmed: 26543456
Pak J Pharm Sci. 2018 Sep;31(5(Special)):2303-2306
pubmed: 30463830