Nutritional assessment in surgical oncology: An ESSO-EYSAC global survey.
Adult
Aged
Breast Neoplasms
/ complications
Colorectal Surgery
Digestive System Neoplasms
/ complications
Humans
Malnutrition
/ complications
Middle Aged
Nutrition Assessment
Nutritionists
Patient Care Team
/ organization & administration
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Sarcoma
/ complications
Serum Albumin
Specialties, Surgical
Surgeons
Surgical Oncology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Weight Loss
MDT
Malnutrition
Nutritional assessment
Surgical oncology
Journal
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
received:
27
03
2020
revised:
21
08
2020
accepted:
28
08
2020
pubmed:
18
9
2020
medline:
2
3
2021
entrez:
17
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The majority of cancer patients report malnutrition, with a significant impact on patient's outcome. This study aimed to compare how nutritional assessment is conducted across different surgical oncology sub-specialties. Survey modules were designed for breast, hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB), upper-gastrointestinal (UGI), sarcoma, peritoneal and surface malignancies (PSM) and colorectal cancer (CRC) surgeries to describe 4 domains: participants' setting, evaluation of clinical factors, use of screening tools and clinical practice. Results were compared among sub-specialties and according to human development index (HDI) in the largest cohorts. Out of 457 answers from 377 global participants (62% European), 35.0% were from breast and 28.9% were from CRC surgeons. Although MDTs management is consistently reported (64-88%), the presence of a nutritionist/dietician ranges from 14.1% to 44.2%. Breast surgeons seldom evaluate albumin (25.6%) and weight loss (30.6%), opposite to HPB, PSM and UGI groups (>70%, p 0.044). Overall, responders declared that the use of screening tools is largely neglected, that nutritional status is often assessed by the surgeons and that nutrition is not consistently modified according to risk factors (range among groups respectively: 1.9%-25.6%, 33.1%-51.4%, 33.1%-60.5%). Less than 20% of breast surgeons assess patients before/after surgery, comparing to >60% of PSM surgeons. However, no statistical differences were documented comparing groups for the majority of the items of the 4 domains. Nutritional evaluation is more often conducted by breast surgeons in medium/low HDI countries comparing very high/high HDI (p 0.04). Nutritional assessment is largely neglected. These results identify target-issues for the implementation of clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32938568
pii: S0748-7983(20)30720-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.028
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Serum Albumin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2074-2082Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any potential financial conflict of interest related to this manuscript.