Slow-growing broilers are healthier and express more behavioural indicators of positive welfare.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 09 2020
Historique:
received: 27 05 2020
accepted: 17 08 2020
entrez: 17 9 2020
pubmed: 18 9 2020
medline: 22 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Broiler chicken welfare is under increasing scrutiny due to welfare concerns regarding growth rate and stocking density. This farm-based study explored broiler welfare in four conditions representing commercial systems varying in breed and planned maximum stocking density: (1) Breed A, 30 kg/m

Identifiants

pubmed: 32938994
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72198-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-72198-x
pmc: PMC7494998
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

15151

Références

European Chicken Commitment https://welfarecommitments.com/europeletter/ (2018).
Better Chicken Commitment, United States and Canada https://welfarecommitments.com/letter.pdf (2019).
Carter, E. & Hubrecht, R. Updated code of practice for the welfare of meat chickens and meat breeding chickens in England. Anim. Welf. 27, 181–185 (2018).
DEFRA. Code of practice for the welfare of meat chickens and meet breeding chickens (Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, HMSO, London, 2018).
Buijs, S., Keeling, L. & Tuyttens, F. Using motivation to feed as a way to assess the importance of space for broiler chickens. Anim. Behav. 81, 145–151 (2011).
Febrer, K., Jones, T. A., Donnelly, C. A. & Dawkins, M. S. Forced to crowd or choosing to cluster? Spatial distribution indicates social attraction in broiler chickens. Anim. Behav. 72, 1291–1300 (2006).
Buijs, S. et al. Resting or hiding? Why broiler chickens stay near walls and how density affects this. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 124, 97–103 (2010).
Dawkins, M. S., Donnelly, C. A. & Jones, T. A. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than stocking density. Nature 427, 342–344 (2004).
pubmed: 14737165
Hall, A. L. The effect of stocking density on the welfare and behaviour of broiler chickens reared commercially. Anim. Welf. 10, 23–40 (2001).
Knowles, T. G. et al. Leg disorders in broiler chickens: prevalence, risk factors and prevention. PLoS ONE 3, e1545. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001545 (2008).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001545 pubmed: 18253493 pmcid: 2212134
Bailie, C. L., Ijichi, C. & O’Connell, N. E. Effects of stocking density and string provision on welfare-related measures in commercial broiler chickens in windowed houses. Poult. Sci. 97, 1503–1510 (2018).
pubmed: 29514265
BenSassi, N. et al. On-farm broiler chicken welfare assessment using transect sampling reflects environmental inputs and production outcomes. PLoS ONE 14, e0214070. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214070 (2019).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214070 pubmed: 30995219 pmcid: 6469842
Arnould, C. & Faure, J. M. Use of pen space and activity of broiler chickens reared at two different densities. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 87, 155–170 (2004).
Dozier, W. A. III. et al. Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poult. Sci. 84, 1332–1338 (2005).
pubmed: 16156220
Davies, J. Slow-growing birds are fast becoming mainstream. Poultry World. https://www.poultryworld.net/Meat/Articles/2019/7/Slow-growing-birds-are-fast-becoming-mainstream-454287E/ (2019).
Bokkers, E. A. & Koene, P. Behaviour of fast-and slow growing broilers to 12 weeks of age and the physical consequences. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 81, 59–72 (2003).
Castellini, C. et al. Adaptation to organic rearing system of eight different chicken genotypes: behaviour, welfare and performance. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 15, 37–46 (2016).
Dixon, L. M. Slow and steady wins the race: the behaviour and welfare of commercial faster growing broiler breeds compared to a commercial slower growing breed. PLoS ONE 15, e0231006. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231006 (2020).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231006 pubmed: 32251460 pmcid: 7135253
Kestin, S. C., Su, G. & Sørensen, P. Relationships in broiler chickens between lameness, liveweight, growth rate and age. Vet. Rec. 148, 195–197 (2001).
pubmed: 11265995
Corr, S. A., Gentle, M. J., McCorquodale, C. C. & Bennett, D. The effect of morphology on walking ability in the modern broiler: a gait analysis study. Anim. Welf. 12, 159–171 (2003).
Bokkers, E. & Koene, P. Motivation and ability to walk for a food reward in fast- and slow-growing broilers to 12 weeks of age. Behav. Proc. 67, 21–130 (2004).
Lawrence, A. B., Vigors, B. & Sandøe, P. What is so positive about positive animal welfare? A critical review of the literature. Animals 9, 783. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100783 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/ani9100783
Mellor, D. J. Updating animal welfare thinking: moving beyond the “Five Freedoms” towards “A Life Worth Living”. Animals 6, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6030021 (2016).
doi: 10.3390/ani6030021
FAWC. Farm Animal Welfare in Great Britain Past Present and Future 1–70 (Farm Animal Welfare Council: Nobel House, London, 2009).
Edgar, J. L., Mullan, S. M., Pritchard, J. C., McFarlane, U. J. C. & Main, D. C. J. Towards a ‘Good Life’ for farm animals: development of a resource tier framework to achieve positive welfare for laying hens. Animals 3, 584–605 (2013).
pubmed: 26479523
Van der Most, P., de Jong, H. B., Parmentier, H. & Verhulst, S. Trade-off between growth and immune function: a meta-analysis of selection experiments. Funct. Ecol. 25, 74–80 (2011).
Vasdal, G., Moe, R., De Jong, I. & Granquist, E. The relationship between measures of fear of humans and lameness in broiler chicken flocks. Animal 12, 334–339 (2018).
pubmed: 28683840
Tuyttens, F. A. M. et al. Assessment of welfare of Brazilian and Belgian broiler flocks using the Welfare Quality protocol. Poult. Sci. 94, 1758–1766 (2015).
pubmed: 26049803
Danbury, T. C., Weeks, C. A., Waterman-Pearson, A. E., Kestin, S. C. & Chambers, J. P. Self-selection of the analgesic drug carprofen by lame broiler chickens. Vet. Rec. 146, 307–311 (2000).
pubmed: 10766114
McGeown, D., Danbury, T. C., Waterman-Pearson, A. E. & Kestin, S. C. Effect of carprofen on lameness in broiler chickens. Vet. Rec. 144, 668–671 (1999).
pubmed: 10404606
Vestergaad, S. & Sanotra, G. S. Relationships between leg disorders and changes in the behaviour of broiler chickens. Vet. Rec. 144, 205–209 (1999).
Weeks, C. A., Danbury, T. D., Davies, H. C., Hunt, P. & Kestin, S. C. The behaviour of broiler chickens and its modification by lameness. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 67, 111–125 (2000).
pubmed: 10719194
Hester, P. Y. The role of environment and management on leg abnormalities in meat-type fowl. Poult. Sci. 73, 904–915 (1994).
pubmed: 8072936
Haslam, S. M. et al. Factors affecting the prevalence of footpad dermatitis, hock burn and breast burn in broiler chicken. Br. Poult. Sci. 48, 264–275 (2007).
pubmed: 17578688
Shepherd, E. M. & Fairchild, B. D. Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poult. Sci. 89, 2043–2051 (2010).
pubmed: 20852093
Bassler, A. W. et al. Potential risk factors associated with contact dermatitis, lameness, negative emotional state, and fear of humans in broiler chicken flocks. Poult. Sci. 92, 2811–2826 (2013).
pubmed: 24135583
Muri, K., Stubsjøen, S., Vasdal, G., Moe, R. O. & Granquist, E. G. Associations between qualitative behaviour assessments and measures of leg health, fear and mortality in Norwegian broiler chicken flocks. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 211, 47–53 (2019).
Bizeray, D., Estevez, I., Leterrier, C. & Faure, J. Effects of increasing environmental complexity on the physical activity of broiler chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 79, 27–41 (2002).
Duncan, I. J. H. Behaviour and behavioural needs. Poult. Sci. 77, 1766–1772 (1988).
Duncan, I. J. H. & Hughes, B. O. Free and operant feeding in domestic fowls. Anim. Behav. 20, 775–777 (1972).
pubmed: 4661320
Vasdal, G., Vas, J., Newberry, R. C. & Moe, R. O. Effects of environmental enrichment on activity and lameness in commercial broiler production. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 22, 197–205 (2019).
pubmed: 29623734
Held, S. D. E. & Špinka, M. Animal play and animal welfare. Anim. Behav. 81, 891–899 (2011).
Baxter, M., Bailie, C. & O’Connell, N. Play behaviour, fear responses and activity levels in commercial broiler chickens provided with preferred environmental enrichments. Animal 13, 171–179 (2019).
pubmed: 29784068
Naseem, S. & King, A. J. Ammonia production in poultry houses can affect health of humans, birds, and the environment—techniques for its reduction during poultry production. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25, 15269–15293 (2018).
Red Tractor. Chicken Standards: Broilers and Poussin (updated 1st October 2019), Version 4.2. https://assurance.redtractor.org.uk/contentfiles/Farmers-6803.pdf (2019).
Shields, S. J., Garner, J. P. & Mench, J. A. Dustbathing by broiler chickens: a comparison of preference for four different substrates. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 87, 69–82 (2004).
Welfare Quality®. assessment Protocol for Poultry (Broilers, Laying Hens) (Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, 2009).
Kells, A., Dawkins, M. S. & Borja, M. C. The effect of a ‘freedom food’ enrichment on the behaviour of broilers on commercial farms. Anim. Welf. 10, 347–356 (2001).
Kestin, S. C., Knowles, T. G., Tinch, A. E. & Gregory, N. G. Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship with genotype. Vet. Rec. 131, 190–194 (1992).
pubmed: 1441174
Clarke, T., Pluske, J. & Fleming, P. Are observer ratings influenced by prescription? A comparison of Free Choice Profiling and Fixed List methods of Qualitative Behavioural Assessment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 177, 77–83 (2016).
Newberry, R. C. et al. Chickens play in the wake of humans. In Proceedings of the 52nd Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, 199 (Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, 2018).
Dunn, O. J. Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 6, 241–252 (1964).
Spinka, M., Newberry, R. C. & Bekoff, M. Mammalian play: training for the unexpected. Q. Rev. Biol. 76, 141–168 (2001).
pubmed: 11409050

Auteurs

Ann C Rayner (AC)

FAI Farms, Northfield Farm, Wytham, OX2 8QJ, UK. annie.rayner@faifarms.com.
Division of Food Animal Science, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, BS40 5DU, UK. annie.rayner@faifarms.com.

Ruth C Newberry (RC)

Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432, Ås, Norway.

Judit Vas (J)

Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432, Ås, Norway.

Siobhan Mullan (S)

Division of Food Animal Science, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, BS40 5DU, UK.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult

Classifications MeSH