Neck-MRI experience for investigation of survived strangulation victims.
Forensic sciences
forensic pathology
medicolegal evaluation
neck-MRI
radiological findings
strangulation survivors
Journal
Forensic sciences research
ISSN: 2471-1411
Titre abrégé: Forensic Sci Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101724928
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
25
10
2018
revised:
28
02
2019
accepted:
28
02
2019
entrez:
17
9
2020
pubmed:
7
5
2019
medline:
7
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For the medicolegal evaluation of victims of survived strangulation, a neck-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be performed for assessing lesions in the inner soft tissues (fat, muscles or lymph nodes, for example). In our institute, such MRI examinations have been performed for a test period of 4 years with the aim of evaluating the use of this tool by forensic pathologists and identifying medicolegal indicators for the performance of neck-MRI in surviving victims of strangulation. We retrospectively reviewed medicolegal reports from all victims examined during the test period. We extracted objective lesions (e.g. petechiae, bruising and abrasions) and reported clinical symptoms (e.g. vision disorder, dysphasia) from the reports. These findings were compared to those reported from the neck-MRI. In total, 112 victims were clinically examined after suspected strangulation. Eleven of these victims underwent an MRI examination of the neck. Eighty-four of the victims presented objective lesions during the clinical examination, with eight showing signs of both petechiae and bruising. Neck-MRI was performed in four of these eight victims and three of them showed lesions visible in MRI. Of 76 victims with bruising as the only objective finding, 66 victims described clinical symptoms. Of those 66 victims, seven were examined by MRI and two demonstrated lesions in MRI. When MRI was performed, relevant findings were detected in 45% of the cases. This leads to the suspicion that many more findings could have been detected in the other victims, if an MRI had been performed in those cases. Our results lead us to the conclusion that an MRI examination of victims of suspected strangulation is useful, and strict indications for its application should be established.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32939427
doi: 10.1080/20961790.2019.1592314
pii: 1592314
pmc: PMC7476612
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
113-118Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of the Academy of Forensic Science.
Références
Forensic Sci Int. 2005 Oct 29;153(2-3):202-7
pubmed: 16139111
Br J Anaesth. 2000 Apr;84(4):521-4
pubmed: 10823110
J Emerg Med. 2001 Oct;21(3):311-5
pubmed: 11604295
J Neurol Sci. 2002 Apr 15;196(1-2):37-40
pubmed: 11959154
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2012 Mar;33(1):105-6
pubmed: 21512390
J Neurol Sci. 2002 Jun 15;198(1-2):21-4
pubmed: 12039659
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Oct;22(4):501-10
pubmed: 16142698
Eur Radiol. 2009 Aug;19(8):1882-9
pubmed: 19283386
Brain Nerve. 2010 Jun;62(6):621-4
pubmed: 20548123
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Nov;81(5):925-930
pubmed: 27537511
Int J Legal Med. 2007 Mar;121(2):115-23
pubmed: 17206435
Arch Neurol. 1991 Aug;48(8):871-4
pubmed: 1898266
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2010 Sep;12(5):228-32
pubmed: 20630784
Resuscitation. 2006 May;69(2):343-5
pubmed: 16458413
J Neurosurg. 2000 Mar;92(3):481-7
pubmed: 10701540
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Apr 15;207(1-3):77-83
pubmed: 20961719
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2012 Mar;33(1):9-12
pubmed: 22442830