Closed Reduction and Immobilization of Pediatric Fifth Metacarpal Neck Fractures.
boxer’s fracture
closed reduction
metacarpal neck fracture
Journal
Hand (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1558-9455
Titre abrégé: Hand (N Y)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101264149
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
18
9
2020
medline:
18
5
2022
entrez:
17
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is no clear consensus for the criteria for closed treatment of metacarpal neck fractures. Our objective was to determine whether closed reduction of pediatric fifth metacarpal neck fractures results in a clinically meaningful improvement in radiographic angulation. We performed a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with fifth metacarpal neck fractures treated with closed reduction. Radiographs were examined for sagittal fracture angulation measured post-reduction, 2 to 14 days post-reduction, and 21 to 35 days post-reduction. We compared the angulation for open versus closed physes, initial fracture angulation greater than or less than 50°, and immobilization in extension versus intrinsic-plus position. Fifty-four subjects were included with an average age of 14.8 years at the time of injury and a mean initial fracture angulation of 42.7°. The improvement in fracture angulation was 8.3° (90% confidence interval [CI], 5.9-10.7) on post-reduction radiographs, 8.5° (90% CI, 6.1-10.9) at 2 to 14 days post-reduction, and 4.3° (90% CI, 1.4-7.2) at 21 to 35 days post-reduction. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with injury angle greater than or equal to 50° had significantly higher mean reductions than those with injury angle less than 50°. In this group, angulation improved 15.6° (90% CI, 8.5-22.7) post-reduction, 15.1° (90% CI, 10.1-20.1) at 2 to 14 days post-reduction, and 16.5° (90% CI, 10.4-22.6) at 21 to 35 days post-reduction. Closed reduction of pediatric fifth metacarpal neck fractures with initial fracture angulation less than 50° may not meaningfully improve sagittal alignment. For fractures with initial angulation greater than or equal to 50°, closed reduction resulted in clinically important, statistically significant, and lasting improvements of 16.5°.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There is no clear consensus for the criteria for closed treatment of metacarpal neck fractures. Our objective was to determine whether closed reduction of pediatric fifth metacarpal neck fractures results in a clinically meaningful improvement in radiographic angulation.
METHODS
We performed a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with fifth metacarpal neck fractures treated with closed reduction. Radiographs were examined for sagittal fracture angulation measured post-reduction, 2 to 14 days post-reduction, and 21 to 35 days post-reduction. We compared the angulation for open versus closed physes, initial fracture angulation greater than or less than 50°, and immobilization in extension versus intrinsic-plus position.
RESULTS
Fifty-four subjects were included with an average age of 14.8 years at the time of injury and a mean initial fracture angulation of 42.7°. The improvement in fracture angulation was 8.3° (90% confidence interval [CI], 5.9-10.7) on post-reduction radiographs, 8.5° (90% CI, 6.1-10.9) at 2 to 14 days post-reduction, and 4.3° (90% CI, 1.4-7.2) at 21 to 35 days post-reduction. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with injury angle greater than or equal to 50° had significantly higher mean reductions than those with injury angle less than 50°. In this group, angulation improved 15.6° (90% CI, 8.5-22.7) post-reduction, 15.1° (90% CI, 10.1-20.1) at 2 to 14 days post-reduction, and 16.5° (90% CI, 10.4-22.6) at 21 to 35 days post-reduction.
CONCLUSIONS
Closed reduction of pediatric fifth metacarpal neck fractures with initial fracture angulation less than 50° may not meaningfully improve sagittal alignment. For fractures with initial angulation greater than or equal to 50°, closed reduction resulted in clinically important, statistically significant, and lasting improvements of 16.5°.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32940066
doi: 10.1177/1558944720942890
pmc: PMC9112733
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
416-421Références
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003 Dec;123(10):534-7
pubmed: 14639483
J Hand Surg Br. 1989 May;14(2):165-7
pubmed: 2746115
Hand Clin. 2006 Feb;22(1):1-10
pubmed: 16504773
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Aug;40(8):1582-5
pubmed: 26143966
J Hand Surg Am. 2002 May;27(3):443-8
pubmed: 12015718
Pediatrics. 1998 Oct;102(4 Pt 1):956-63
pubmed: 9755272
J Hand Surg Am. 1999 Jul;24(4):835-44
pubmed: 10447177
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Jan;136(1):135-42
pubmed: 26559192
Paediatr Drugs. 2004;6(1):11-31
pubmed: 14969567
Clin Radiol. 2001 Aug;56(8):667-9
pubmed: 11467869
Hand Clin. 2013 Nov;29(4):507-18
pubmed: 24209950
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686