Regulatory inspection of registered private drug shops in East-Central Uganda-what it is versus what it should be: a qualitative study.
Drug sellers
Drug shops
Inspection
Regulation
Supervision
Uganda
Journal
Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice
ISSN: 2052-3211
Titre abrégé: J Pharm Policy Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101627192
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
09
06
2020
accepted:
19
08
2020
entrez:
18
9
2020
pubmed:
19
9
2020
medline:
19
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Regulatory inspection of private drug shops in Uganda is a mandate of the Ministry of Health carried out by the National Drug Authority. This study evaluated how this mandate is being carried out at national, district, and drug shop levels. Specifically, perspectives on how the inspection is done, who does it, and challenges faced were sought from inspectors and drug sellers. Six key informant interviews (KIIs) were held with inspectors at the national and district level, while eight focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted among nursing assistants, and two FGDs were held with nurses. The study appraised current methods of inspecting drug sellers against national professional guidelines for licensing and renewal of class C drug shops in Uganda. Transcripts were managed using Atlas ti version 7 (ATLAS.ti GmbH, Berlin) data management software where the thematic content analysis was done. Five themes emerged from the study: authoritarian inspection, delegated inspection, licensing, training, and bribes. Under authoritarian inspection, drug sellers decried the high handedness used by inspectors when found with expired or no license at all. For delegated inspection, drug sellers said that sometimes, inspectors send health assistants and sub-county chiefs for inspection visits. This cadre of people is not recognized by law as inspectors. Inspectors trained drug sellers on how to organize their drug shops better and how to use new technologies such as rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) in diagnosing malaria. Bribes were talked about mostly by nursing assistants who purported that inspectors were not interested in inspection per se but collecting illicit payments from them. Inspectors said that the facilitation they received from the central government were inadequate for a routine inspection. The current method of inspecting drug sellers is harsh and instills fear among drug sellers. There is a need to establish a well-recognized structure of inspection as well as establish channels of dialogue between inspectors and drug sellers if meaningful compliance is to be achieved. The government also needs to enhance both human and financial resources if meaningful inspection of drug sellers is to take place.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Regulatory inspection of private drug shops in Uganda is a mandate of the Ministry of Health carried out by the National Drug Authority. This study evaluated how this mandate is being carried out at national, district, and drug shop levels. Specifically, perspectives on how the inspection is done, who does it, and challenges faced were sought from inspectors and drug sellers.
METHODS
METHODS
Six key informant interviews (KIIs) were held with inspectors at the national and district level, while eight focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted among nursing assistants, and two FGDs were held with nurses. The study appraised current methods of inspecting drug sellers against national professional guidelines for licensing and renewal of class C drug shops in Uganda. Transcripts were managed using Atlas ti version 7 (ATLAS.ti GmbH, Berlin) data management software where the thematic content analysis was done.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Five themes emerged from the study: authoritarian inspection, delegated inspection, licensing, training, and bribes. Under authoritarian inspection, drug sellers decried the high handedness used by inspectors when found with expired or no license at all. For delegated inspection, drug sellers said that sometimes, inspectors send health assistants and sub-county chiefs for inspection visits. This cadre of people is not recognized by law as inspectors. Inspectors trained drug sellers on how to organize their drug shops better and how to use new technologies such as rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) in diagnosing malaria. Bribes were talked about mostly by nursing assistants who purported that inspectors were not interested in inspection per se but collecting illicit payments from them. Inspectors said that the facilitation they received from the central government were inadequate for a routine inspection.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The current method of inspecting drug sellers is harsh and instills fear among drug sellers. There is a need to establish a well-recognized structure of inspection as well as establish channels of dialogue between inspectors and drug sellers if meaningful compliance is to be achieved. The government also needs to enhance both human and financial resources if meaningful inspection of drug sellers is to take place.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32944257
doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-00265-9
pii: 265
pmc: PMC7488315
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
55Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec 28;11:351
pubmed: 22204447
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40
pubmed: 10940958
Med J Aust. 2008 Feb 18;188(4):243-6
pubmed: 18279135
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):786
pubmed: 29183314
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 27;12:223
pubmed: 22838649
Indian J Pharm Sci. 2015 Sep-Oct;77(5):542-9
pubmed: 26798168
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):533-44
pubmed: 24193818
East Afr Med J. 2004 Feb;Suppl:S12-6
pubmed: 15125111
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2015 Sep 25;8:23
pubmed: 26413304
Qual Health Res. 2009 Nov;19(11):1632-41
pubmed: 19843971
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Apr 9;32(2):206-223
pubmed: 29624136
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 13;17(1):136
pubmed: 28193274
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 9;18(1):532
pubmed: 29986729
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Feb;52(3):393-404
pubmed: 11330774
Oman Med J. 2012 Mar;27(2):104-7
pubmed: 22496933
Qual Health Res. 2015 Sep;25(9):1212-22
pubmed: 26184336
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Jun 11;15:103
pubmed: 26062608
Res Nurs Health. 2001 Jun;24(3):230-40
pubmed: 11526621
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 8;7(2):e000057
pubmed: 32148704
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 09;(11):CD008992
pubmed: 22071861
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Oct 11;4(Suppl 9):e001151
pubmed: 31673434
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017 Jul 11;10:21
pubmed: 28702204
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 11;(8):CD009855
pubmed: 27510030
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010 Nov 24;10:29
pubmed: 21106099
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 30;18(1):62
pubmed: 29382331
Qual Res Psychol. 2015 Apr 3;12(2):202-222
pubmed: 27499705
HERD. 2016 Jul;9(4):16-25
pubmed: 26791375
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 15;6(3):e010632
pubmed: 26980439
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Mar 11;11:26
pubmed: 21396104
Health Policy Plan. 2010 Mar;25(2):125-34
pubmed: 19923206
Res Nurs Health. 2010 Feb;33(1):77-84
pubmed: 20014004
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jul 16;9:52
pubmed: 19607668
Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12
pubmed: 14769454
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):120
pubmed: 29454350
Health Expect. 2019 Apr;22(2):245-253
pubmed: 30525272
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Sep 13;2(Suppl 3):e000334
pubmed: 29259824
East Afr Med J. 2004 Feb;Suppl:S33-40
pubmed: 15125114
Deviant Behav. 2016 Feb 1;37(2):196-218
pubmed: 26973364
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Dec 6;3(6):e000944
pubmed: 30613424
BMJ. 2008 Aug 07;337:a949
pubmed: 18687730
East Afr J Public Health. 2008 Aug;5(2):117-21
pubmed: 19024421