Attitudes of Anesthesiology Residents Toward a Small Group Blended Learning Class.
Anesthesiology
Attitude Assessment
Education
Residency Program
Small Group
Journal
Anesthesiology and pain medicine
ISSN: 2228-7523
Titre abrégé: Anesth Pain Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101585412
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
16
05
2020
accepted:
30
05
2020
entrez:
18
9
2020
pubmed:
19
9
2020
medline:
19
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has been used to evaluate the residents' competency; however, the thriving of residents needs especial training methods and techniques. Small group learning has been used for this propose. This study assessed the attitudes of CA-1 to CA-3 anesthesiology residents toward level-specific small-group blended learning. Anesthesiology residents from Department of Anesthesiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU), Tehran, Iran participated in this cross-sectional attitude assessment descriptive-analytical study throughout the 2nd academic semester (May-October 2019). They took part in a level-specific small-group blended learning program and filled out an attitude assessment questionnaire. The questionnaire included eight closed questions and was filled out anonymously. The residents believed that this program made important contributions to their theory training and clinical skills of anesthesia; while created a greater sense of solidarity. In addition, nearly the majority of the respondents did not believe that participating in the classes made interference in their clinical duties or was a difficult task. Instead, the majority of residents believed that these classes were in favor of reducing their burnout. The reliability of the questionnaire based on Cronbach's Alpha was 0.885. Anesthesiology residents are in favor of small-group learning, especially when considering their clinical setting and the degree of burnout they tolerate.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has been used to evaluate the residents' competency; however, the thriving of residents needs especial training methods and techniques. Small group learning has been used for this propose.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
This study assessed the attitudes of CA-1 to CA-3 anesthesiology residents toward level-specific small-group blended learning.
METHODS
METHODS
Anesthesiology residents from Department of Anesthesiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU), Tehran, Iran participated in this cross-sectional attitude assessment descriptive-analytical study throughout the 2nd academic semester (May-October 2019). They took part in a level-specific small-group blended learning program and filled out an attitude assessment questionnaire. The questionnaire included eight closed questions and was filled out anonymously.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The residents believed that this program made important contributions to their theory training and clinical skills of anesthesia; while created a greater sense of solidarity. In addition, nearly the majority of the respondents did not believe that participating in the classes made interference in their clinical duties or was a difficult task. Instead, the majority of residents believed that these classes were in favor of reducing their burnout. The reliability of the questionnaire based on Cronbach's Alpha was 0.885.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Anesthesiology residents are in favor of small-group learning, especially when considering their clinical setting and the degree of burnout they tolerate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32944563
doi: 10.5812/aapm.103148
pmc: PMC7472787
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e103148Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interests: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Références
Anesth Analg. 2019 Nov;129(5):1191
pubmed: 31613804
Acad Med. 1990 Sep;65(9 Suppl):S63-7
pubmed: 2400509
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002 Fall;22(4):205-13
pubmed: 12613055
Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Feb 23;9(1):e88657
pubmed: 30881915
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015 Aug 25;6:525-32
pubmed: 26347361
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8648925
pubmed: 29318155
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):54
pubmed: 29587737
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Jun;9(3):294-301
pubmed: 28638506
Med Teach. 2010;32(9):715-26
pubmed: 20795801
Br J Anaesth. 2003 Mar;90(3):333-7
pubmed: 12594147
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Oct;99(4):453-6
pubmed: 17704523
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Dec 10;14:258
pubmed: 25491129
Anesth Analg. 2019 Nov;129(5):1194-1196
pubmed: 31613807
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 20;12(7):e0181336
pubmed: 28727749
Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Apr 23;10(2):e98566
pubmed: 32547933
Med Teach. 2013 Nov;35(11):e1561-72
pubmed: 24004029
Perspect Med Educ. 2018 Apr;7(2):120-125
pubmed: 29476425
Med Teach. 2008;30(4):347-64
pubmed: 18569655