Onset times and duration of analgesic effect of various concentrations of local anesthetic solutions in standardized volume used for brachial plexus blocks.

Anesthesia Critical care Duration of action local anesthetics Intensive care medicine Medical imaging Mixture of local anesthetics Onset time of local anesthetics Pain management Pain research Patient satisfaction regional anaesthesia Quality improvement anesthesia Trauma Ultrasound guidance in regional anesthesia

Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 09 04 2020
revised: 05 06 2020
accepted: 11 08 2020
entrez: 18 9 2020
pubmed: 19 9 2020
medline: 19 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Visualization of the nerve structures of brachial plexus allows anesthesiologists to use a lower dose of local anesthetics. The content of this low dose is not unequivocal, consequently, the pharmacokinetics of local anesthetics used by various authors are difficult to compare. In this study, the onset times and duration of the analgesic effect of local anesthetic mixture solutions used for brachial plexus blocks are investigated and the quality of anesthesia is compared. 85 unpremedicated American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I-III, 19-83-year-old patients scheduled for upper limb trauma surgery are assigned to four groups for the axillary-supraclavicular block with lidocaine 1% and bupivacaine 0,5% 1:1 mixture (Group LB) or bupivacaine 0.33% (Group BS) or lidocaine 0,66% (Group LS) or bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 1% 2:1 mixture (Group BL). 0.4 ml/kg was administered to the four groups. The onset time was significantly shorter in the lidocaine group (LS 13.0 ± 1.02) than in the other study groups (LB 16.64 ± 0.89; BS 17.21 ± 0.74; BL 16.92 ± 0.51 min ±SEM, p = 0.002). No differences were observed in the onset times between LB, BS, and BL groups (p > 0.05). Statistical differences were found in the duration of local anesthetics between LB (392.9 ± 20.4), BS (546.4 ± 14.9), LS (172.85 ± 7.8), and BL (458.7 ± 11.9 min ±SEM, p = 0.001). Lidocaine does not shorten the onset times, but significantly decreases the duration of action of bupivacaine when used in mixture solutions. Lidocaine exhibits a good quality of block in the applied dose, while other solutions have excellent quality. Bupivacaine without lidocaine has the longest duration of action to achieve the longest postoperative analgesia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32944664
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04718
pii: S2405-8440(20)31561-9
pii: e04718
pmc: PMC7481523
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e04718

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Author(s).

Références

J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011 Jan;4(1):8-11
pubmed: 21772732
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:173796
pubmed: 21716725
Asian J Anesthesiol. 2017 Dec;55(4):83-86
pubmed: 29248589
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):49-53
pubmed: 24565388
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 May;27(5):749-52
pubmed: 27106648
Clin Anat. 2014 Mar;27(2):210-21
pubmed: 23959836
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1996 Oct;86(10):487-91
pubmed: 8918026
Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Nov-Dec;58(6):700-4
pubmed: 25624532
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;101(4):549-56
pubmed: 18682410
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):289-99
pubmed: 23788067
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;34(2):134-70
pubmed: 19282714
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Oct;26(5):600-4
pubmed: 23963233
Anesth Analg. 1994 Mar;78(3):507-13
pubmed: 8109769
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):337-43
pubmed: 26066385
Br J Anaesth. 2010 May;104(5):633-6
pubmed: 20233750
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;35(2):152-61
pubmed: 20216033
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jan;9(1):UC01-6
pubmed: 25738062
Anesthesiology. 2009 Jul;111(1):25-9
pubmed: 19512869
Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jun;64(6):617-625
pubmed: 28205117
Anesth Analg. 2017 Jan;124(1):308-335
pubmed: 27749354
F1000Res. 2016 May 18;5:
pubmed: 27239291
Injury. 2021 Mar;52 Suppl 1:S78-S82
pubmed: 32063339
Anaesthesia. 2010 Apr;65 Suppl 1:48-56
pubmed: 20377546
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jul;109(1):279-83
pubmed: 19535722
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 May-Jun;34(3):215-8
pubmed: 19587618
Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2006 Jan;1(1):81-6
pubmed: 18393784
Med Ultrason. 2014 Sep;16(3):246-51
pubmed: 25110766
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):195-204
pubmed: 26695877
Can J Anaesth. 2007 Mar;54(3):176-82
pubmed: 17331928
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Sep/Oct;42(5):551-553
pubmed: 28820800
Anesth Analg. 2012 Oct;115(4):963-7
pubmed: 22798531
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Dec;107 Suppl 1:i90-5
pubmed: 22156274
Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):529-535
pubmed: 28934784
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Jun;72(3):221-232
pubmed: 30929415
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2010 May-Aug;7(2):101-4
pubmed: 20431220

Auteurs

Robert Almasi (R)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Pecs Medical School, 7624, Pécs Ifjuság u.13, Hungary.

Barbara Rezman (B)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Pecs Medical School, 7624, Pécs Ifjuság u.13, Hungary.

Zsofia Kriszta (Z)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Pecs Medical School, 7624, Pécs Ifjuság u.13, Hungary.

Balazs Patczai (B)

Department of Traumatology and Hand Surgery, University of Pecs Medical School, 7624, Pécs Ifjuság u.13, Hungary.

Norbert Wiegand (N)

Department of Traumatology and Hand Surgery, University of Pecs Medical School, 7624, Pécs Ifjuság u.13, Hungary.

Lajos Bogar (L)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Pecs Medical School, 7624, Pécs Ifjuság u.13, Hungary.

Classifications MeSH