Developing implementation research capacity: longitudinal evaluation of the King's College London Implementation Science Masterclass, 2014-2019.

Capacity building Course Evaluation Implementation science Training

Journal

Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 24 05 2020
accepted: 18 08 2020
entrez: 18 9 2020
pubmed: 19 9 2020
medline: 19 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite an increasing number of training opportunities in implementation science becoming available, the demand for training amongst researchers and practitioners is unmet. To address this training shortfall, we developed the King's College London 'Implementation Science Masterclass' (ISM), an innovative 2-day programme (and currently the largest of its kind in Europe), developed and delivered by an international faculty of implementation experts. This paper describes the ISM and provides delegates' quantitative and qualitative evaluations (gathered through a survey at the end of the ISM) and faculty reflections over the period it has been running (2014-2019). Across the 6-year evaluation, a total of 501 delegates have attended the ISM, with numbers increasing yearly from 40 (in 2014) to 147 (in 2019). Delegates represent a diversity of backgrounds and 29 countries from across the world. The overall response rate for the delegate survey was 64.5% (323/501). Annually, the ISM has been rated 'highly' in terms of delegates' overall impression (92%), clear and relevant learning objectives (90% and 94%, respectively), the course duration (85%), pace (86%) and academic level 87%), and the support provided on the day (92%). Seventy-one percent of delegates reported the ISM would have an impact on how they approached their future work. Qualitative feedback revealed key strengths include the opportunities to meet with an international and diverse pool of experts and individuals working in the field, the interactive nature of the workshops and training sessions, and the breadth of topics and contexts covered. Yearly, the UK ISM has grown, both in size and in its international reach. Rated consistently favourably by delegates, the ISM helps to tackle current training demands from all those interested in learning and building their skills in implementation science. Evaluation of the ISM will continue to be an annual iterative process, reflective of changes in the evidence base and delegates changing needs as the field evolves.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Despite an increasing number of training opportunities in implementation science becoming available, the demand for training amongst researchers and practitioners is unmet. To address this training shortfall, we developed the King's College London 'Implementation Science Masterclass' (ISM), an innovative 2-day programme (and currently the largest of its kind in Europe), developed and delivered by an international faculty of implementation experts.
METHODS METHODS
This paper describes the ISM and provides delegates' quantitative and qualitative evaluations (gathered through a survey at the end of the ISM) and faculty reflections over the period it has been running (2014-2019).
RESULTS RESULTS
Across the 6-year evaluation, a total of 501 delegates have attended the ISM, with numbers increasing yearly from 40 (in 2014) to 147 (in 2019). Delegates represent a diversity of backgrounds and 29 countries from across the world. The overall response rate for the delegate survey was 64.5% (323/501). Annually, the ISM has been rated 'highly' in terms of delegates' overall impression (92%), clear and relevant learning objectives (90% and 94%, respectively), the course duration (85%), pace (86%) and academic level 87%), and the support provided on the day (92%). Seventy-one percent of delegates reported the ISM would have an impact on how they approached their future work. Qualitative feedback revealed key strengths include the opportunities to meet with an international and diverse pool of experts and individuals working in the field, the interactive nature of the workshops and training sessions, and the breadth of topics and contexts covered.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Yearly, the UK ISM has grown, both in size and in its international reach. Rated consistently favourably by delegates, the ISM helps to tackle current training demands from all those interested in learning and building their skills in implementation science. Evaluation of the ISM will continue to be an annual iterative process, reflective of changes in the evidence base and delegates changing needs as the field evolves.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32944717
doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00066-w
pii: 66
pmc: PMC7488442
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

74

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R023697/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S001255/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsNick Sevdalis is the Director of London Safety and Training Solutions Ltd, which provides quality and safety training and advisory services on a consultancy basis to healthcare organisation globally. Brian Mittman (2014–present) and Nick Sevdalis (2015–present) are co-directors of the ISM. Graham Thornicroft was a co-director of the ISM in 2014. The other authors have no conflicts to declare.

Références

Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):593-601
pubmed: 27030472
Implement Sci. 2011 Dec 09;6:127
pubmed: 22152223
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(2):97-102
pubmed: 26028446
Scientometrics. 2017 Sep;112(3):1367-1390
pubmed: 29249842
Acad Med. 2012 Mar;87(3):271-8
pubmed: 22373617
Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 28;10:136
pubmed: 26416302
Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8 Suppl 2):II46-54
pubmed: 11583121
Yearb Med Inform. 2000;(1):65-70
pubmed: 27699347
BMC Psychol. 2015 Sep 16;3:32
pubmed: 26376626
Implement Sci. 2019 Feb 28;14(1):18
pubmed: 30819223
Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 05;8:105
pubmed: 24007290
Implement Sci. 2017 Apr 27;12(1):55
pubmed: 28449697
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 22;13(1):18
pubmed: 29357876
Implement Sci. 2013 Mar 12;8:29
pubmed: 23497462
Implement Sci. 2013 Jan 24;8:12
pubmed: 23347882
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 21;12(1):137
pubmed: 29162150
Glob Health Action. 2016 Nov 14;9:31899
pubmed: 27846928
Implement Sci. 2009 Jun 12;4:33
pubmed: 19523216
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):117-126
pubmed: 28371050
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 20;14(1):66
pubmed: 31221201
Implement Sci. 2019 Aug 6;14(1):77
pubmed: 31387596
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 13;11(1):137
pubmed: 27737693
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112511
pubmed: 31439403
Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(2):183-91
pubmed: 27064720
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10(3):152-8
pubmed: 11533422
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Oct 14;11:85
pubmed: 21999174
J R Soc Med. 2011 Dec;104(12):510-20
pubmed: 22179294
Implement Sci. 2018 Apr 25;13(1):63
pubmed: 29695267
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):624-635
pubmed: 27142266
J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Jun;37(2):364-6
pubmed: 26022812
Implement Sci. 2014 Feb 24;9:28
pubmed: 24565209
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2020 Mar;47(2):254-264
pubmed: 31667667
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr;43(2):172-86
pubmed: 26746638
Implement Sci. 2018 Aug 6;13(1):106
pubmed: 30081921
Implement Sci. 2016 May 06;11:62
pubmed: 27154000
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2018 Apr 04;5:2382120518761875
pubmed: 29707648
Implement Sci. 2015 Jul 04;10:94
pubmed: 26141909
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 2;12(1):101
pubmed: 28768546
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2017 Oct-Dec;38(4):392-406
pubmed: 27775487
Inj Prev. 2006 Dec;12(6):357-9
pubmed: 17170181
Implement Sci. 2015 Aug 12;10:114
pubmed: 26264453
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3 Suppl 3):S322-S329
pubmed: 28215389
Implement Sci. 2016 Mar 08;11:30
pubmed: 26952719
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76
pubmed: 20957426
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 27;18(1):502
pubmed: 29945609
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2635-45
pubmed: 12826639
Public Health Rep. 2014 Nov-Dec;129(6):536-42
pubmed: 25364057
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Oct;2(5):259-266
pubmed: 31223491
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 16;12(1):104
pubmed: 28814328

Auteurs

Rachel Davis (R)

Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK.

Brian Mittman (B)

Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, USA.

Madelene Boyton (M)

Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK.

Aoife Keohane (A)

Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK.

Lucy Goulding (L)

Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK.

Jane Sandall (J)

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Science, King's College London, London, UK.

Graham Thornicroft (G)

Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK.
Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK.

Nick Sevdalis (N)

Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH