Effect of yeast-fermented de-hulled rice on in vitro gas production, nutrient degradability, and rumen fermentation.


Journal

Tropical animal health and production
ISSN: 1573-7438
Titre abrégé: Trop Anim Health Prod
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1277355

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 31 08 2019
accepted: 10 09 2020
pubmed: 19 9 2020
medline: 29 1 2021
entrez: 18 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of this experiment was to test the effect of yeast-fermented de-hulled rice (YDR) levels of protein-rich feed with different kinds of roughages on in vitro gas production, nutrient degradability, and rumen fermentation. The treatments were randomly assigned according to a 2 × 4 factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design (CRD). The two experimental factors were comprised of two roughages (R) (untreated rice straw (RS) and sweet grass hay (SGH)) and four ratios of roughage to yeast-fermented de-hulled rice (R:YDR) (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, and 25:75). Thus, there were 8 treatment combinations. The results revealed that the interaction between R and R:YDR ratios influenced on the gas production rate constant for the insoluble fraction ratio (c) (P < 0.01). The in vitro dry mater degradability (IVDMD) was improved by SGH and R:YDR ratios (P < 0.05). Supplementation of YDR with both of roughage sources (RS and SGH) increased propionate (C3) (P < 0.05) and total VFA production (P < 0.01); both factors showed interactive effects on rumen methane production (P < 0.01). Moreover, bacterial population was significantly increased by the SGH:YDR ratios (P < 0.05). Therefore, it could be summarized that supplementing YDR, an enriched protein source with SGH:YDR ratio at 50-75:50-25 ratio significantly enhanced nutrient degradability and in vitro rumen fermentation efficiency.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32944871
doi: 10.1007/s11250-020-02393-5
pii: 10.1007/s11250-020-02393-5
doi:

Substances chimiques

Dietary Fiber 0
Gases 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3567-3573

Références

AOAC., 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists Inc.
AOAC., 1998. Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.
Atasoglu, C., Newbold, C.J. and Wallace, R.J., 2001. Incorporation of [15N] ammonia by the cellulolytic ruminal bacteria fibrobacter succinogenes BL2, ruminococcus albus SY3, and ruminococcus flavefaciens 17. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67(6), 2.
Boonnop, K., Wanapat, M., Nontaso, N. and Wanapat, S., 2009. Enriching nutritive value of cassava root by yeast fermentation. Scientia Agricola, 66, 629–633.
doi: 10.1590/S0103-90162009000500007
Boonnop, K., Wanapat, M. and Navanukraw, C., 2010. Replacement of soybean meal by yeast fermented-cassava chip protein (YEFECAP) in concentrate diets fed on rumen fermentation, microbial population and nutrient digestibilities in ruminants. Journal of Animal Veterinary advances, 9, 1727–1734.
doi: 10.3923/javaa.2010.1727.1734
Chanthakhoun, V., Wanapat, M., Kongmun, P. and Cherdthong, A., 2012. Comparison of ruminal fermentation characteristics and microbial population in swamp buffalo and cattle. Livestock Science, 143, 172–176.
Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Walker, N. D. and Bach, A., 2008. Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: Past, present and future. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 145, 5–26.
doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.019
Cieslak, A., Zmora, P., Matkowski, A., Nawrot-Hadzik, I., Pers-Kamczyc, E., El-Sherbiny, M. and Szumacher-Strabel, M., 2016. Tannins from Sanguisorba officinalis affect in vitro rumen methane production and fermentation. JAPS: Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 26, 54–62.
Crichton, N., 1999. Information point: Tukey Multiple Comparison test. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 8, 299–304
Devendra, C., Leng, R.A., 2011. Feed resources for animals in Asia: issues, strategies for use, intensification and integration for increased productivity. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 24(3), 303–321.
doi: 10.5713/ajas.2011.r.05
Erasmus, L.J., 1991. The importance of the duodenal amino acid profile for dairy cows and the impact of changes in these profiles following the use of Yea-Sacc 1026. Feed Compounder (United Kingdom), 11, 24–29.
Galyean, M., 1989. Laboratory procedure in animal nutrition research, Department of animal and range science, New Mexico StateUniversity, USA.
Guedes, C.M., Goncalves, D., Rodrigues, M.A.M. and Dias da Silva, A., 2008. Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on ruminal fermentation and fibre degradation of maize silages in cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 145, 27–40.
Habeeb, A.A.M., 2017. Importance of yeast in ruminants feeding on production and reproduction. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 2(4), 49.
doi: 10.11648/j.eeb.20170204.11
Jouany, J.P., 2006. Optimizing rumen functions in the close-up transition period and early lactation to drive dry matter intake and energy balance in cows. Animal reproduction science, 96, 250–264.
doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.08.005 pubmed: 16996704
Kamra, D.N., Pawar, M., Singh, B., 2012. Effect of plant secondary metabolites on rumen methanogens and methane emissions by ruminants. In Dietary phytochemicals and microbes (pp. 351–370). Springer, Dordrecht.
Liu, B., Xu, J., Lan, X., Xu, R., Zhou, J., Wang, X. and Chou, K.C., 2014. iDNA-Prot| dis: identifying DNA-binding proteins by incorporating amino acid distance-pairs and reduced alphabet profile into the general pseudo amino acid composition. Plos One, 9(9), e106691.
Mapato, C. and Wanapat, M., 2018. New roughage source of Pennisetum purpureum cv. Mahasarakham utilization for ruminants feeding under global climate change. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 31, 1890–1896.
doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0210 pubmed: 29879829 pmcid: 6212747
Menke, K.H. and Steingass, H., 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal research and development, 28, 7–55.
Moss, A.R., Jouany, J.P. and Newbold, J., 2000. Methane productionby ruminants: Its contribution to global warming. Annales De Zootechnie, 49,231–253.
doi: 10.1051/animres:2000119
Oboh, G. and Akindahunsi, A.A., 2003. Biochemical changes in cassava products (flour & gari) subjected to Saccharomyces cerevisae solid media fermentation. Food Chemistry, 82(4), 599–602.
Oeztuerk, H., 2009. Effects of live and autoclaved yeast cultures on ruminal fermentation in vitro. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 18, 142–150.
doi: 10.22358/jafs/66378/2009
Ørskov, E.R. and McDonald, I., 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, 92, 499–503.
doi: 10.1017/S0021859600063048
Polyorach, S., Wanapat, M. and Cherdthong, A., 2014. Influence of yeast fermented cassava chip protein (YEFECAP) and roughage to concentrate ratio on ruminal fermentation and microorganisms using in vitro gas production technique. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 27, 36–45.
doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13298 pubmed: 25049924 pmcid: 4093292
Ramin, M. and Huhtanen, P., 2013. Development of equations for predicting methane emissions from ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science, 96, 2476–2493.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6095 pubmed: 23403199
Samuel, M., Sagathewan S., Thomas J. and Mathen G., 1997. An HPLC method for estimation of volatile fatty acids of ruminal fluid. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 67, 805–811.
SAS., 2013. User's Guide: Statistic, Version 9.412th Edition. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
Sommai, S., Ampapon, T., Mapato, C., Totakul, P., Viennasay, B., Matra, M. and Wanapat, M., 2020. Replacing soybean meal with yeast-fermented cassava pulp (YFCP) on feed intake, nutrient digestibilities, rumen microorganism, fermentation, and N-balance in Thai native beef cattle. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 1–7.
Van Soest, P.J. and Robertson, J.B., 1985. Analysis of forages and fibrous foods a laboratory manual for animal science. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A., 1991. Methods of dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch carbohydrates in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583–3597.
doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
Wanapat, M., 2009. Potential uses of local feed resources for ruminants. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 41(7), 1035.
doi: 10.1007/s11250-008-9270-y pubmed: 19015946
Wanapat, M., and Pimpa, O., 1999. Effect of ruminal NH
doi: 10.5713/ajas.1999.904
Wanapat, M., Polyorach, S., Chanthakhoun, V. and Sornsongnern, N., 2011.Yeast-fermented cassava chip protein (YEFECAP) concentrate for lactating dairy cows fed on urea-lime treated rice straw. Livestock Science, 139, 258–263.
doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.01.016
Wanapat, M., Kongmun, P., Poungchompu, O., Cherdthong, A., Khejornsart, P., Pilajun, R. and Kaenpakdee, S., 2012. Effects of plants containing secondary compounds and plant oils on rumen fermentation and ecology. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44(3), 399–405.
Wanapat, M., Gunun, P., Anantasook, N. and Kang, S., 2014. Changes of rumen pH, fermentation and microbial population as influenced by different ratios of roughage (rice straw) to concentrate in dairy steers. Journal of Agricultural Science, 152, 675–685.
doi: 10.1017/S0021859613000658
Yamada, E.A. and Sgarbieri, V.C., 2005. Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) protein concentrate: preparation, chemical composition, and nutritional and functional properties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53, 3931–3936.

Auteurs

Pajaree Totakul (P)

Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

Thiwakorn Ampapon (T)

Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Surin Campus, Surin, 32000, Thailand.

Suban Foiklang (S)

Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Maejo University, Chiang Mai, 50290, Thailand.

Suthipong Uriyapongson (S)

Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

Sukruthai Sommai (S)

Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

Maharach Matra (M)

Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

Bounnaxay Viennasay (B)

Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

Metha Wanapat (M)

Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. metha@kku.ac.th.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH