Do Patients With Keratoconus Have Minimal Disease Knowledge?


Journal

Cornea
ISSN: 1536-4798
Titre abrégé: Cornea
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8216186

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 May 2021
Historique:
received: 04 05 2020
accepted: 13 07 2020
pubmed: 19 9 2020
medline: 25 2 2023
entrez: 18 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To assess whether Swiss adult citizens diagnosed with keratoconus have the minimal knowledge that a corneal specialist would expect they should have. Experts defined the "minimal keratoconus knowledge" (MKK) with respect to definition, risk factors, symptoms, and possible treatment options of keratoconus. A survey was performed in 167 patients with keratoconus [mean age 38.8 years (SD 13.9), 77.7% male] in 5 specialized institutions. Of each participant, salient clinical characteristics, highest educational level, paramedical background, and specific health experience with keratoconus in the social surrounding were obtained. We calculated the proportion of MKK and examined whether patients with higher education and greater disease experience would perform better than those from other groups in multivariate analyses. No single citizen reached 100% MKK. The mean MKK was 35.2%, and the range was 0% to 76.2%. Participants with a university degree had only a moderately higher MKK [+8.7% (95% confidence interval: 4.4-13.0); P < 0.001]. Per age decile, the MKK declined by 3.1% (95% confidence interval: 1.2-4.9), P = 0.002. Disease duration, severity of keratoconus in Kmax values, and history of surgical treatment did not significantly increase MKK. Surprisingly, MKK was also lower in patients with a paramedical background [-6.3% (-14.1 to 1.4); P = 0.107]. This sample of Swiss patients with keratoconus did not know more than a third of the MKK. We found a little difference within various subgroups. There is a substantial mismatch between caregivers' expectations of patients' knowledge and patients' active knowledge regarding their condition. This may lead to an inefficient care delivery and misunderstandings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32947405
pii: 00003226-202105000-00013
doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002501
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

624-627

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Références

Stegmann ME, Festen S, Brandenbarg D, et al. Using the outcome prioritization tool (OPT) to assess the preferences of older patients in clinical decision-making: a review. Maturitas. 2019;128:49–52.
Brunner F, Gymesi A, Kissling R, et al. Disease-related knowledge of patients with chronic regional pain syndrome. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:458–462.
Weiser KT, Lacy BE, Noddin L, et al. Patient knowledge and perspective on irritable bowel syndrome: development of a survey instrument. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:284–295.
Bachmann LM, Gutzwiller FS, Puhan MA, et al. Do citizens have minimum medical knowledge? A survey. BMC Med. 2007;5:14.
Rosenthal B, Thompson B. Awareness of age-related macular degeneration in adults: the results of a large-scale international survey. Optometry. 2003;74:16–24.
Rani PK, Raman R, Subramani S, et al. Knowledge of diabetes and diabetic retinopathy among rural populations in India, and the influence of knowledge of diabetic retinopathy on attitude and practice. Rural Remote Health. 2008;8:838.
Jandorf S, Krogh Nielsen M, Sorensen K, et al. Low health literacy levels in patients with chronic retinal disease. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19:174.
Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Piette J, et al. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA. 2002;288:475–482.
Muir KW, Santiago-Turla C, Stinnett SS, et al. Health literacy and adherence to glaucoma therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:223–226.
Muir KW, Lee PP. Health literacy and ophthalmic patient education. Surv Ophthalmol. 2010;55:454–459.
Boynton PM, Greenhalgh T. Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ. 2004;328:1312–1315.
Bae JM. Shared decision making: relevant concepts and facilitating strategies. Epidemiol Health. 2017;39:e2017048.

Auteurs

Philipp B Baenninger (PB)

Department of Ophthalmology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Lucas M Bachmann (LM)

Medignition Inc. Research Consultants Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Markus Ritzmann (M)

Falco Linsen AG, Linsencentrum, Tägerwilen, Switzerland.

Frank Blaser (F)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Zisis Gatzioufas (Z)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and.

Marco Alder (M)

Department of Ophthalmology, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Armin Handzic (A)

Department of Ophthalmology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Katja Iselin (K)

Department of Ophthalmology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Claude Kaufmann (C)

Department of Ophthalmology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Michael A Thiel (MA)

Department of Ophthalmology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH