Variability in the Physiologic Response to Fluid Bolus in Pediatric Patients Following Cardiac Surgery.
Journal
Critical care medicine
ISSN: 1530-0293
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0355501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
19
9
2020
medline:
26
5
2021
entrez:
18
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Fluid boluses aiming to improve the cardiac output and oxygen delivery are commonly administered in children with shock. An increased mean arterial pressure in addition to resolution of tachycardia and improved peripheral perfusion are often monitored as clinical surrogates for improvement in cardiac output. The objective of our study is to describe changes in cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, and their relationship to other indices of cardiovascular performance. The objective of our study is to describe changes in cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, and their relationship to other indices of cardiovascular performance. We prospectively analyzed hemodynamic data from children in the cardiac ICU who received fluid bolus (10mL/kg of Ringers-Lactate over 30 min) for management of shock and/or hypoperfusion within 12h of cardiac surgery. Cardiac index responders and mean arterial pressure-responders were defined as CI ≥10% and mean arterial pressure ≥10%, respectively. We evaluated the gradient for venous-return (mean systemic filling pressure-central venous pressure), arterial load properties (systemic vascular resistance index and elastance index) and changes in vasopressor support after fluid bolus. Fifty-seven children between 1 month and 16 years (median Risk adjustment after congenital heart surgery Model for Outcome Surveillance in Australia and New Zealand score of 3.8 (interquartile range 3.7-4.6) received fluid bolus. Cardiac index-responsiveness and mean arterial pressure-responsiveness rates were 33% and 56%, respectively. No significant correlation was observed between changes in mean arterial pressure and cardiac index (r = 0.035, p = 0.79). Although the mean systemic filling pressure - central venous pressure and the number of cardiac index-responders after fluid bolus were similar, the arterial load parameters did not change in mean arterial pressure-nonresponders. Forty-three patients (75%) had a change in Vasoactive-Inotrope Score after the fluid bolus, of whom 60% received higher level of vasoactive support. The mean arterial pressure response to fluid bolus in cardiac ICU patients was unpredictable with a poor relationship between cardiac index-responsiveness and mean arterial pressure-responsiveness. Because arterial hypotension is frequently a trigger for administering fluids and changes in blood pressure are commonly used for tracking changes in cardiac output, we suggest a cautious and individualized approach to repeat fluid bolus based solely on lack of mean arterial pressure response to the initial fluid, since the implications include decreased arterial tone even if the cardiac index increases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Fluid boluses aiming to improve the cardiac output and oxygen delivery are commonly administered in children with shock. An increased mean arterial pressure in addition to resolution of tachycardia and improved peripheral perfusion are often monitored as clinical surrogates for improvement in cardiac output. The objective of our study is to describe changes in cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, and their relationship to other indices of cardiovascular performance.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of our study is to describe changes in cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, and their relationship to other indices of cardiovascular performance.
DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTIONS
We prospectively analyzed hemodynamic data from children in the cardiac ICU who received fluid bolus (10mL/kg of Ringers-Lactate over 30 min) for management of shock and/or hypoperfusion within 12h of cardiac surgery. Cardiac index responders and mean arterial pressure-responders were defined as CI ≥10% and mean arterial pressure ≥10%, respectively. We evaluated the gradient for venous-return (mean systemic filling pressure-central venous pressure), arterial load properties (systemic vascular resistance index and elastance index) and changes in vasopressor support after fluid bolus.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
Fifty-seven children between 1 month and 16 years (median Risk adjustment after congenital heart surgery Model for Outcome Surveillance in Australia and New Zealand score of 3.8 (interquartile range 3.7-4.6) received fluid bolus. Cardiac index-responsiveness and mean arterial pressure-responsiveness rates were 33% and 56%, respectively. No significant correlation was observed between changes in mean arterial pressure and cardiac index (r = 0.035, p = 0.79). Although the mean systemic filling pressure - central venous pressure and the number of cardiac index-responders after fluid bolus were similar, the arterial load parameters did not change in mean arterial pressure-nonresponders. Forty-three patients (75%) had a change in Vasoactive-Inotrope Score after the fluid bolus, of whom 60% received higher level of vasoactive support.
CONCLUSIONS
The mean arterial pressure response to fluid bolus in cardiac ICU patients was unpredictable with a poor relationship between cardiac index-responsiveness and mean arterial pressure-responsiveness. Because arterial hypotension is frequently a trigger for administering fluids and changes in blood pressure are commonly used for tracking changes in cardiac output, we suggest a cautious and individualized approach to repeat fluid bolus based solely on lack of mean arterial pressure response to the initial fluid, since the implications include decreased arterial tone even if the cardiac index increases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32947469
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004621
pii: 00003246-202011000-00033
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1062-e1070Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Ofori-Amanfo G, Cheifetz IM. Pediatric postoperative cardiac care. Crit Care Clin. 2013; 29:185–202
Davis AL, Carcillo JA, Aneja RK, et al. American college of critical care medicine clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2017; 45:1061–1093
de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al. Part 12: Pediatric advanced life support: 2015 American heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2015; 132:S526–S542
Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020; 21:e52–e106
Maitland K, George EC, Evans JA, et al. Exploring mechanisms of excess mortality with early fluid resuscitation: Insights from the FEAST trial. BMC Med. 2013; 11:1–15
Hilton AK, Bellomo R. A critique of fluid bolus resuscitation in severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2012; 16:302
Raina R, Sethi SK, Wadhwani N, et al. Fluid overload in critically Ill children. Front Pediatr. 2018; 6:306
Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002; 121:2000–2008
Gan H, Cannesson M, Chandler JR, et al. Predicting fluid responsiveness in children: A systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2013; 117:1380–1392
Cecconi M, Hofer C, Teboul JL, et al.; FENICE Investigators; ESICM Trial Group. Fluid challenges in intensive care: The FENICE study: A global inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2015; 41:1529–1537
Monge García MI, Guijo González P, Gracia Romero M, et al. Effects of fluid administration on arterial load in septic shock patients. Intensive Care Med. 2015; 41:1247–1255
Pierrakos C, Velissaris D, Scolletta S, et al. Can changes in arterial pressure be used to detect changes in cardiac index during fluid challenge in patients with septic shock?. Intensive Care Med. 2012; 38:422–428
Monge García MI, Barrasa González H. Why did arterial pressure not increase after fluid administration?. Med Intensiva. 2017; 41:546–549
Haque IU, Zaritsky AL. Analysis of the evidence for the lower limit of systolic and mean arterial pressure in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007; 8:138–144
Ulate KP, Yanay O, Jeffries H, et al. An elevated low cardiac output syndrome score is associated with morbidity in infants after congenital heart surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017; 18:26–33
Brunner N, de Jesus Perez VA, Richter A, et al. Perioperative pharmacological management of pulmonary hypertensive crisis during congenital heart surgery. Pulm Circ. 2014; 4:10–24
Khraiche D, Ben Moussa N. Assessment of right ventricular systolic function by echocardiography after surgical repair of congenital heart defects. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016; 109:113–119
Bercovitz RS, Shewmake AC, Newman DK, et al. Validation of a definition of excessive postoperative bleeding in infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 155:2112–2124.e2
Narula J, Chauhan S, Ramakrishnan S, et al. Electrical cardiometry: A reliable solution to cardiac output estimation in children with structural heart disease. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017; 31:912–917
McSharry B, Straney L, Alexander J, et al.; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Paediatric Study Group and Centre for Outcomes and Resource Evaluation. RACHS - ANZ: A modified risk adjustment in congenital heart surgery model for outcome surveillance in Australia and New Zealand. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019; 8:e011390
Parkin WG, Leaning MS. Therapeutic control of the circulation. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008; 22:391–400
Wijnberge M, Sindhunata DP, Pinsky MR, et al. Estimating mean circulatory filling pressure in clinical practice: A systematic review comparing three bedside methods in the critically ill. Ann Intensive Care. 2018; 8:73
Gaies MG, Jeffries HE, Niebler RA, et al. Vasoactive-inotropic score is associated with outcome after infant cardiac surgery: An analysis from the pediatric cardiac critical care consortium and virtual PICU system registries. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014; 15:529–537
Ranjit S, Aram G, Kissoon N, et al. Multimodal monitoring for hemodynamic categorization and management of pediatric septic shock: A pilot observational study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014; 15:1–10
Monge García MI, Saludes Orduña P, Cecconi M. Understanding arterial load. Intensive Care Med. 2016; 42:1625–1627
Byrne L, Obonyo NG, Diab SD, et al. Unintended consequences: Fluid resuscitation worsens shock in an ovine model of endotoxemia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018; 198:1043–1054
Long E, Babl FE, Oakley E, et al.; Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT). Does fluid bolus therapy increase blood pressure in children with sepsis?. Emerg Med Australas. 2020; 32:54–60
Sanders M, Servaas S, Slagt C. Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020; 34:433–460