Effects of executive attention on sentence processing in aphasia.
Broca’s aphasia
attention deficit
attention shifting
case morphology
garden path
non-fluent aphasia
Journal
Aphasiology
ISSN: 0268-7038
Titre abrégé: Aphasiology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8708531
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
entrez:
21
9
2020
pubmed:
22
9
2020
medline:
22
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the recent years there has been increasing interest in the effects of attentional control on syntactic comprehension, as measured in garden path sentence resolution. Persons with aphasia (PWA) experience greater penalties in garden path sentences compared to language-unimpaired adults but the origin of this deficit remains a controversial issue. One of the possible deficits has been claimed to be disambiguation of lexical cues in the sentence. However, in languages such as English with little morphological variation this connection is hard to establish. To test this hypothesis we used garden path sentences in a morphologically rich language, Greek, where morphological cues may resolve garden path at the lexical level. We further tested whether domain-general attentional control abilities and in particular shifts in attentional control predict garden path resolution in PWA and age- and education-matched controls. This study aimed to determine whether PWA were able to integrate disambiguating morphological (Case) cues while processing garden path sentences. In addition, we tested whether domain-general attentional control and in particular attentional shift from global to local and local to global information (as defined by Navon, 1977) correlates directly with garden path resolution in PWA and healthy controls. Fifteen participants with non-fluent/agrammatic aphasia along with fifteen age- and education-matched language-unimpaired adults performed an online self-paced reading and grammaticality judgment task that included object/subject ambiguous sentences. Syntactic ambiguity was created by the optional transitivity of verbs, while the garden path effect was resolved by morphological Case. The individuals' executive attention skills were tested through an online non-verbal global-local attention shifting task that measured costs stemming from shifting attention from the global to the local level, and vice versa. PWA were slower and more erroneous than controls in integrating Case cues to disambiguate garden path sentences as manifested in the self-paced reading and grammaticality judgment task. In the global local task, PWA exhibited greater global-to-local (vs. local-to-global) attention shifting costs, while controls did not exhibit dissociation. In the regression analysis, garden path resolution in PWA was significantly predicted by global-to-local attention shifting costs, while controls' garden path resolution was significantly predicted by local-to-global attention shift costs. The present study showed for the first time that morphological cues can shed light in sentence comprehension deficits exhibited by PWA. Furthermore, domain-general attentional control abilities were significantly associated with sentence comprehension abilities in both healthy controls and PWA.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In the recent years there has been increasing interest in the effects of attentional control on syntactic comprehension, as measured in garden path sentence resolution. Persons with aphasia (PWA) experience greater penalties in garden path sentences compared to language-unimpaired adults but the origin of this deficit remains a controversial issue. One of the possible deficits has been claimed to be disambiguation of lexical cues in the sentence. However, in languages such as English with little morphological variation this connection is hard to establish. To test this hypothesis we used garden path sentences in a morphologically rich language, Greek, where morphological cues may resolve garden path at the lexical level. We further tested whether domain-general attentional control abilities and in particular shifts in attentional control predict garden path resolution in PWA and age- and education-matched controls.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to determine whether PWA were able to integrate disambiguating morphological (Case) cues while processing garden path sentences. In addition, we tested whether domain-general attentional control and in particular attentional shift from global to local and local to global information (as defined by Navon, 1977) correlates directly with garden path resolution in PWA and healthy controls.
METHODS & PROCEDURE
METHODS
Fifteen participants with non-fluent/agrammatic aphasia along with fifteen age- and education-matched language-unimpaired adults performed an online self-paced reading and grammaticality judgment task that included object/subject ambiguous sentences. Syntactic ambiguity was created by the optional transitivity of verbs, while the garden path effect was resolved by morphological Case. The individuals' executive attention skills were tested through an online non-verbal global-local attention shifting task that measured costs stemming from shifting attention from the global to the local level, and vice versa.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS
RESULTS
PWA were slower and more erroneous than controls in integrating Case cues to disambiguate garden path sentences as manifested in the self-paced reading and grammaticality judgment task. In the global local task, PWA exhibited greater global-to-local (vs. local-to-global) attention shifting costs, while controls did not exhibit dissociation. In the regression analysis, garden path resolution in PWA was significantly predicted by global-to-local attention shifting costs, while controls' garden path resolution was significantly predicted by local-to-global attention shift costs.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The present study showed for the first time that morphological cues can shed light in sentence comprehension deficits exhibited by PWA. Furthermore, domain-general attentional control abilities were significantly associated with sentence comprehension abilities in both healthy controls and PWA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32952261
doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1622647
pmc: PMC7500515
mid: NIHMS1033107
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
943-969Subventions
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC014475
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure Statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Références
Brain Lang. 1991 Aug;41(2):123-48
pubmed: 1933255
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Aug;19(4):525-42
pubmed: 9342688
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2009 Sep;26(6):527-67
pubmed: 20183014
Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(8):1196-208
pubmed: 11931923
Brain Lang. 2004 Apr;89(1):76-82
pubmed: 15010239
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Aug;40(4):792-808
pubmed: 9263944
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018 Apr;28(3):309-351
pubmed: 27143500
Brain. 2011 Feb;134(Pt 2):415-31
pubmed: 21278407
J Commun Disord. 2006 Jan-Feb;39(1):37-61
pubmed: 16039661
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2015;32(5):243-65
pubmed: 26216232
Neuron. 1999 Oct;24(2):427-32
pubmed: 10571235
Brain Lang. 1991 Aug;41(2):311-36
pubmed: 1933262
Brain Lang. 2000 Aug;74(1):1-25
pubmed: 10924214
Brain Cogn. 1996 Mar;30(2):244-53
pubmed: 8812002
Behav Neurol. 2010;22(3-4):111-9
pubmed: 20595743
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Dec;107:9-24
pubmed: 29061490
Brain Lang. 2000 Mar;72(1):40-72
pubmed: 10716874
Semin Speech Lang. 2008 Aug;29(3):169-87; quiz C 3-4
pubmed: 18720315
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jun;100:171-194
pubmed: 28392303
Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Jun;25(6-7):464-79
pubmed: 21453043