Anatomical Mapping of the External Obturator Footprint: A Study In Cadavers with Implications for Direct Anterior THA.
Journal
Clinical orthopaedics and related research
ISSN: 1528-1132
Titre abrégé: Clin Orthop Relat Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0075674
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2021
01 02 2021
Historique:
received:
06
04
2020
accepted:
19
08
2020
pubmed:
22
9
2020
medline:
6
8
2021
entrez:
21
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The external obturator footprint in the trochanteric fossa has been suggested as a potential landmark for stem depth in direct anterior THA. Its upper border can be visualized during surgical exposure of the femur. A recent study reported that the height of the tendon has little variability (6.4 ± 1.4 mm) as measured on CT scans and that the trochanteric fossa is consistently visible on conventional pelvic radiographs. However, it is unclear where exactly the footprint of this tendon should be templated during preoperative planning so that it can be useful intraoperatively. In this study, we sought: (1) to provide instructions on exactly where to template the external obturator footprint on a preoperative planning radiograph, and (2) to confirm the small variability in height of the external obturator footprint found on CT scans in a cadaver study. Two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) imaging was used to map the anatomy of the external obturator footprint. This dual approach was chosen because of their complementarity; conventional 2-D radiographs translate to clinical practice but 3-D navigation-based digitalization combined with CT allows for a better understanding of the cortical lines that comprise the outline of the trochanteric fossa. In 12 (four males, mean age 80 years, range 69 to 88) formalin-treated cadaveric lower extremities including the pelvis, the external obturator tendon was dissected, and the top and bottom end of its footprint marked with two small needles, and calibrated radiographs were taken. For another five (three males, mean age 75.7 years, range 61 to 91) fresh-frozen cadaveric lower extremities, including femoral reflective marker frames, CT scans were obtained and the exact location of the external obturator footprint was recorded using 3-D navigation-based digitalization. Qualitative analysis of both imaging modalities was used to develop instructions on where the external obturator footprint should be templated on a preoperative planning radiograph. Quantitative analysis of the dimensions of the external obturator footprint was performed. The lowest point of the external obturator footprint was consistently found (± 1 mm) at the intersection of the vertical line comprised of the lateral wall of the trochanteric fossa and the oblique line formed by the intertrochanteric crest and therefore allows templating of this structure on the preoperative planning radiograph. The median (range) height of the footprint measured 6.4 mm and demonstrated small variability (4.7 to 7.6). We suggest templating a 6.4-mm circle with its bottom on the intersection described above. The distance between the templated shoulder of the stem and the top of the circle can be used intraoperatively for guidance. Discrepancy should lead to re-evaluation of stem depth and leg length. Future work will investigate the usability, validity, and reliability of the proposed methodology in daily clinical practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The external obturator footprint in the trochanteric fossa has been suggested as a potential landmark for stem depth in direct anterior THA. Its upper border can be visualized during surgical exposure of the femur. A recent study reported that the height of the tendon has little variability (6.4 ± 1.4 mm) as measured on CT scans and that the trochanteric fossa is consistently visible on conventional pelvic radiographs. However, it is unclear where exactly the footprint of this tendon should be templated during preoperative planning so that it can be useful intraoperatively.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES
In this study, we sought: (1) to provide instructions on exactly where to template the external obturator footprint on a preoperative planning radiograph, and (2) to confirm the small variability in height of the external obturator footprint found on CT scans in a cadaver study.
METHODS
Two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) imaging was used to map the anatomy of the external obturator footprint. This dual approach was chosen because of their complementarity; conventional 2-D radiographs translate to clinical practice but 3-D navigation-based digitalization combined with CT allows for a better understanding of the cortical lines that comprise the outline of the trochanteric fossa. In 12 (four males, mean age 80 years, range 69 to 88) formalin-treated cadaveric lower extremities including the pelvis, the external obturator tendon was dissected, and the top and bottom end of its footprint marked with two small needles, and calibrated radiographs were taken. For another five (three males, mean age 75.7 years, range 61 to 91) fresh-frozen cadaveric lower extremities, including femoral reflective marker frames, CT scans were obtained and the exact location of the external obturator footprint was recorded using 3-D navigation-based digitalization. Qualitative analysis of both imaging modalities was used to develop instructions on where the external obturator footprint should be templated on a preoperative planning radiograph. Quantitative analysis of the dimensions of the external obturator footprint was performed.
RESULTS
The lowest point of the external obturator footprint was consistently found (± 1 mm) at the intersection of the vertical line comprised of the lateral wall of the trochanteric fossa and the oblique line formed by the intertrochanteric crest and therefore allows templating of this structure on the preoperative planning radiograph. The median (range) height of the footprint measured 6.4 mm and demonstrated small variability (4.7 to 7.6).
CONCLUSIONS
We suggest templating a 6.4-mm circle with its bottom on the intersection described above.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The distance between the templated shoulder of the stem and the top of the circle can be used intraoperatively for guidance. Discrepancy should lead to re-evaluation of stem depth and leg length. Future work will investigate the usability, validity, and reliability of the proposed methodology in daily clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32956147
pii: 00003086-202102000-00015
doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001492
pmc: PMC7899571
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
288-294Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Each author certifies that neither he nor she, nor any member of his or her immediate family, has funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.
Références
Ansari Moein CMS, Gerrits PD, Duis HJT. Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: Time for standardised terminology? Injury. 2013;44:722–725.
Austin DC, Dempsey BE, Kunkel ST, Torchia MT, Jevsevar DS. A comparison of radiographic leg-length and offset discrepancies between 2 intraoperative measurement techniques in anterior total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today. 2019;5:181–186.
Bolink SAAN, Lenguerrand E, Brunton LR, Hinds N, Wylde V, Heyligers IC, Blom AW, Whitehouse MR, Grimm B. The association of leg length and offset reconstruction after total hip arthroplasty with clinical outcomes. Clin Biomech . 2019;68:89–95.
Bonnin MP, Archbold PHA, Basiglini L, Fessy MH, Beverl DE. Do we medialise the hip centre of rotation in total hip arthroplasty? Influence of acetabular offset and surgical technique. Hip Int . 2012;22:371–378.
Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaulé PE, Kim YJ, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, Leunig M, Schoenecker PL, Millis MB. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surgery Am. 2008;90:47–66.
Enke O, Levy YD, Bruce WJ. Accuracy of leg length and femoral offset restoration after total hip arthroplasty with the utilisation of an intraoperative calibration gauge. Hip Int . 2019:112070001983638.
Jennison TN, Craig P, Davis ED. A comparison of two different navigated hip replacement techniques on leg length discrepancy. J Orthop . 2018;15:765–767.
Lecoanet P, Vargas M, Pallaro J, Thelen T, Ribes C, Fabre T. Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: can leg length be satisfactorily controlled via anterior approach without a traction table? Evaluation in 56 patients with EOS 3D. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res . 2018;104:1143–1148.
Lim S-J, Park Y-S. Plain radiography of the hip: a review of radiographic techniques and image features. Hip Pelvis. 2015;27:125.
Loughenbury FA, McWilliams AB, Stewart TD, Redmond AC, Stone MH. Hip surgeons and leg length inequality after primary hip replacement. Hip Int . 2019;29:102–108.
Meermans G, Van Doorn J, Kats JJ. Restoration of the centre of rotation in primary total hip arthroplasty the influence of acetabular floor depth and reaming technique. Bone Joint J 2016;98:1597–1603.
Merle C, Innmann MM, Waldstein W, Pegg EC, Aldinger PR, Gill HS, Murray DW, Grammatopoulos G. High variability of acetabular offset in primary hip osteoarthritis influences acetabular reaming - a computed tomography–based anatomic study. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:1808–1814.
Nossa JM, Muñoz JM, Riveros EA, Rueda G, Márquez D, Pérez J. Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: comparison of 3 intraoperative measurement methods. Hip Int . 2018;28:254–258.
Papadakis SA, Shepherd L, Babourda EC, Papadakis S. Piriform and trochanteric fossae. A drawing mismatch or a terminology error? A review. Surg Radiol Anat . 2005;27:223–226.
Patcas R, Angst C, Kellenberger CJ, Schätzle MA, Ullrich O, Markic G. Method of visualisation influences accuracy of measurements in cone-beam computed tomography. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2015;43:1277–1283.
Renkawitz T, Weber T, Dullien S, Woerner M, Dendorfer S, Grifka J, Weber M. Leg length and offset differences above 5 mm after total hip arthroplasty are associated with altered gait kinematics. Gait Posture. 2016;49:196–201.
Rüdiger HA, Fritz B, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M, Pfirrmann CW, Sutter R. The external obturator footprint as a landmark in total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach: a CT-based analysis. Hip Int . 2019;29:96–101.
Shemesh SS, Robinson J, Keswani A, Bronson MJ, Moucha CS, Chen D. The accuracy of digital templating for primary total hip arthroplasty: is there a difference between direct anterior and posterior approaches? J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:1884–1889.
Turunen MJ, Khayyeri H, Guizar-Sicairos M, Isaksson H. Effects of tissue fixation and dehydration on tendon collagen nanostructure. J Struct Biol . 2017;199:209–215.
Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Innocenti B, Parizel PM BJ. How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee? Knee. 2009;16:358–365.
Weber M, Thieme M, Kaiser M, Völlner F, Worlicek M, Craiovan B, Grifka J, Renkawitz T. Accuracy of leg length and offset restoration in femoral pinless navigation compared to navigation using a fixed pin during total hip arthroplasty. Biomed Res Int. [Published online June 25, 2018]. DOI: 10.1155/2018/1639840 .
doi: 10.1155/2018/1639840