Relationship between Cortical Bone Thickness and Cancellous Bone Density at Dental Implant Sites in the Jawbone.
cancellous bone density
cortical bone thickness
dental cone-beam computed tomography
dental implant site
jawbone
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Sep 2020
17 Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
19
08
2020
revised:
10
09
2020
accepted:
15
09
2020
entrez:
22
9
2020
pubmed:
23
9
2020
medline:
23
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dental implant surgery is a common treatment for missing teeth. Its survival rate is considerably affected by host bone quality and quantity, which is often assessed prior to surgery through dental cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Dental CBCT was used in this study to evaluate dental implant sites for (1) differences in and (2) correlations between cancellous bone density and cortical bone thickness among four regions of the jawbone. In total, 315 dental implant sites (39 in the anterior mandible, 42 in the anterior maxilla, 107 in the posterior mandible, and 127 in the posterior maxilla) were identified in dental CBCT images from 128 patients. All CBCT images were loaded into Mimics 15.0 to measure cancellous bone density (unit: grayscale value (GV) and cortical bone thickness (unit: mm)). Differences among the four regions of the jawbone were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance and Scheffe's posttest. Pearson coefficients for correlations between cancellous bone density and cortical bone thickness were also calculated for the four jawbone regions. The results revealed that the mean cancellous bone density was highest in the anterior mandible (722 ± 227 GV), followed by the anterior maxilla (542 ± 208 GV), posterior mandible (535 ± 206 GV), and posterior maxilla (388 ± 206 GV). Cortical bone thickness was highest in the posterior mandible (1.15 ± 0.42 mm), followed by the anterior mandible (1.01 ± 0.32 mm), anterior maxilla (0.89 ± 0.26 mm), and posterior maxilla (0.72 ± 0.19 mm). In the whole jawbone, a weak correlation (
Identifiants
pubmed: 32957724
pii: diagnostics10090710
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090710
pmc: PMC7555203
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : China Medical University
ID : CMU108-MF-86
Organisme : Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
ID : MOST 109-2221-E-039-005
Références
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Feb;42(2):276-80
pubmed: 22867739
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009 Feb;12(1):25-32
pubmed: 19154272
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1-132
pubmed: 356184
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jul;22(7):691-698
pubmed: 21054551
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Dec;15(6):893-906
pubmed: 22251553
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Mar-Apr;21(2):290-7
pubmed: 16634501
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Feb;105(2):231-8
pubmed: 18230392
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 May;21(5):558-62
pubmed: 20443807
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81-100
pubmed: 4924041
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995 Nov;80(5):540-54
pubmed: 8556464
Int J Oral Surg. 1981 Dec;10(6):387-416
pubmed: 6809663
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jul;136(1):104-8
pubmed: 19577156
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Aug;136(2):230-5
pubmed: 19651353
Braz Oral Res. 2012 Nov-Dec;26(6):550-6
pubmed: 23184166
BMC Oral Health. 2008 Nov 24;8:32
pubmed: 19025637
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):59-64
pubmed: 19344026
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995 May-Jun;10(3):303-11
pubmed: 7615326
Eur J Oral Sci. 2008 Dec;116(6):497-506
pubmed: 19049518
J Periodontol. 1991 Jan;62(1):2-4
pubmed: 2002427
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jun;129(6):721.e7-12
pubmed: 16769488
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 May 1;37(5):346-51
pubmed: 20113389
Implant Dent. 2017 Jun;26(3):405-411
pubmed: 28125517
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Apr;15(2):251-61
pubmed: 21599830
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Sep;94(3):242-58
pubmed: 16126077
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Feb;12(1):79-84
pubmed: 11168274
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(1):e1-7
pubmed: 24325572
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18(9):1398-403
pubmed: 24867520
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov 5;39(1):33
pubmed: 29159171
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jun;25(6):723-8
pubmed: 23442126
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Oct;20(10):1140-5
pubmed: 19519789
Arch Oral Biol. 1994 May;39(5):429-37
pubmed: 8060267
J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Jan;31(1):18-22
pubmed: 15125591
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Oct;14(5):515-27
pubmed: 12969355
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jul;24(7):793-7
pubmed: 22469137
J Dent. 2010 Aug;38(8):612-20
pubmed: 20546821
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 May;20(5):503-6
pubmed: 19250241
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Jun;19(3):440-446
pubmed: 28074591
Bone. 2005 Dec;37(6):776-80
pubmed: 16154396
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jul;23(7):832-6
pubmed: 21545533
J Dent Educ. 1988 Dec;52(12):725-36
pubmed: 3057017
Eur J Oral Sci. 1998 Jun;106(3):721-64
pubmed: 9672097
J Dent (Tehran). 2016 Mar;13(2):108-115
pubmed: 27928239
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Sep 1;18(9):785-789
pubmed: 28874642
J Clin Exp Dent. 2013 Dec 01;5(5):e245-52
pubmed: 24455090