Lived experience research as a resource for recovery: a mixed methods study.
Hope
Knowledge translation
Lived experience research
Mental health recovery
Service user research
Journal
BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 09 2020
21 09 2020
Historique:
received:
12
05
2020
accepted:
08
09
2020
entrez:
22
9
2020
pubmed:
23
9
2020
medline:
30
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lived experience research is conducted by people who have experience of mental health issues and is therefore better placed than more traditional research to illuminate participants' experiences. Findings that focus on identifying enablers of recovery from a lived experience perspective have the potential to assist people in their recovery process. However, this lived experience research is often difficult to find, access and interpret. We co-produced user-friendly and engaging resources to disseminate findings from six lived experience research studies. This paper seeks to answer the research questions: a) Did exposure to lived experience research increase hopefulness for participants?; and b) How else did interacting with lived experience research resources influence participants' lives? Thirty-eight participants were introduced to four resources of their choosing by peer workers over a four-week period. The helpfulness of resources was evaluated using mixed methods, including a quasi-experimental analysis of change in hope, an anonymous survey and in-depth interviews. Findings indicated that the resources promoted hope, but that increases in hopefulness may not be seen immediately. Other impacts include that the resources: encouraged helpful activities; provided a positive experience; increased valued knowledge; encouraged people to reflect on their journey and think constructively about mental health issues; helped people to feel less alone; and assisted people to explain their situation to others. The research suggests the potential usefulness of lived experience research resources, presented in user-friendly formats, in the lives of people who experience mental health issues and implies a need to nurture this type of research.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Lived experience research is conducted by people who have experience of mental health issues and is therefore better placed than more traditional research to illuminate participants' experiences. Findings that focus on identifying enablers of recovery from a lived experience perspective have the potential to assist people in their recovery process. However, this lived experience research is often difficult to find, access and interpret. We co-produced user-friendly and engaging resources to disseminate findings from six lived experience research studies. This paper seeks to answer the research questions: a) Did exposure to lived experience research increase hopefulness for participants?; and b) How else did interacting with lived experience research resources influence participants' lives?
METHODS
Thirty-eight participants were introduced to four resources of their choosing by peer workers over a four-week period. The helpfulness of resources was evaluated using mixed methods, including a quasi-experimental analysis of change in hope, an anonymous survey and in-depth interviews.
RESULTS
Findings indicated that the resources promoted hope, but that increases in hopefulness may not be seen immediately. Other impacts include that the resources: encouraged helpful activities; provided a positive experience; increased valued knowledge; encouraged people to reflect on their journey and think constructively about mental health issues; helped people to feel less alone; and assisted people to explain their situation to others.
CONCLUSIONS
The research suggests the potential usefulness of lived experience research resources, presented in user-friendly formats, in the lives of people who experience mental health issues and implies a need to nurture this type of research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32958045
doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02861-0
pii: 10.1186/s12888-020-02861-0
pmc: PMC7507671
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
456Références
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):724-5
pubmed: 10487984
J Ment Health. 2016;25(1):23-7
pubmed: 26484831
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Apr;13(2):92-8
pubmed: 18416914
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Apr;60(4):491-7
pubmed: 19339324
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2005 Spring;28(4):403-6
pubmed: 15895927
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Aug;27(4):1219-1229
pubmed: 29847015
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jun 1;35(6):1091-7
pubmed: 27269027
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2016 Mar 3;3:2333393616631679
pubmed: 28462330
Br J Psychiatry. 2019 May;214(5):260-268
pubmed: 30898177
Community Ment Health J. 2020 Aug;56(6):1044-1052
pubmed: 31993841
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;199(6):445-52
pubmed: 22130746
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2009 Jan;30(1):31-8
pubmed: 19148819
Scand J Caring Sci. 2010 Dec;24 Suppl 1:67-74
pubmed: 20210899
Australas Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;15(3):237-41
pubmed: 17516188
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2005 Oct;66:29-35
pubmed: 16214720
J Adv Nurs. 1992 Oct;17(10):1251-9
pubmed: 1430629