Comparison of Ligament-Repair Techniques for the Syndesmosis: A Simulated Cadaveric Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography Analysis.
fibular position
imaging under load
ligamentous injury
reconstructive techniques
syndesmotic injury
Journal
The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons
ISSN: 1542-2224
Titre abrégé: J Foot Ankle Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9308427
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
15
01
2019
revised:
13
08
2019
accepted:
25
08
2019
pubmed:
23
9
2020
medline:
25
6
2021
entrez:
22
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although the literature describes a variety of reconstructive techniques for the syndesmosis, only few studies offer comparative data. Therefore, the authors compared 2 different ligament repair techniques for the syndesmosis. Sixteen paired fresh-frozen human cadaveric lower limbs were embedded in polymethyl methacrylate mid-calf and placed in a custom-made weightbearing simulation frame. Computed tomography scans of each limb were obtained in a simulated foot-flat loading (75N) and single-leg stance (700N) in 5 different foot positions (previously reported data). One of each pair was then reconstructed via 1 of 2 methods: a free medial Achilles tendon autograft or a long peroneal tendon ligament repair. The specimens were rescanned, compared with their respective intact states and directly with each other. Measurements of fibular diastasis, rotation, anteroposterior translation, mediolateral translation, and fibular shortening were performed on the axial cuts of the computed tomography scans, 1 cm proximal to the roof of the plafond. There was no significant difference in fibular positioning with direct comparison of the reconstructions. Comparisons with their respective intact states, however, showed differences in their abilities to control reduction, most notably in the externally rotated and dorsiflexed positions of the foot. Neither reconstruction was clearly superior in restoring physiologic conditions. Only with a comparison of each technique to its respective intact state were differences between the techniques revealed, a benefit of this particular testing method.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32958353
pii: S1067-2516(20)30139-3
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.08.037
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1156-1161Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.