Depression screening using patient-targeted feedback in general practices: study protocol of the German multicentre GET.FEEDBACK.GP randomised controlled trial.
adult psychiatry
depression & mood disorders
primary care
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 09 2020
21 09 2020
Historique:
entrez:
22
9
2020
pubmed:
23
9
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Approximately one out of six patients in primary care suffers from depression, which often remains undetected. Evidence regarding the efficacy of depression screening in primary care, however, is inconsistent. A previous single-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) in cardiac patients, the DEPSCREEN-INFO trial, provided the first evidence that written feedback to patients following a positive depression screening reduces depression severity and leads to more comprehensive patient engagement in mental healthcare. To amplify these effects, the feedback should be tailored according to patients' needs and preferences. The GET.FEEDBACK.GP RCT will test the efficacy of this patient-targeted feedback intervention in primary care. The multicentre three-arm GET.FEEDBACK.GP RCT aims to recruit a total of 1074 primary care patients from North, East and South Germany. Patients will be screened for depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). In the case of a positive depression screening result (PHQ-9 score ≥10), the participant will be randomised into one of three groups to either receive (a) patient-targeted and general practitioner (GP)-targeted feedback regarding the depression screening results, (b) only GP-targeted feedback or (c) no feedback. Patients will be followed over a period of 12 months. The primary outcome is depression severity (PHQ-9) 6 months after screening. Secondary outcomes include patient engagement in mental healthcare, professional depression care and cost-effectiveness. According to a statistical analysis plan, the primary endpoint of all randomised patients will be analysed regarding the intention-to-treat principle. The Ethics Committee of the Hamburg Medical Association approved the study. A clinical trial company will ensure data safety, monitoring and supervision. The multicentre GET.FEEDBACK.GP RCT is the first trial in primary care that tests the efficacy of a patient-targeted feedback intervention as an adjunct to depression screening. Its results have the potential to influence future depression guidelines and will be disseminated in scientific as well as patient-friendly language. NCT03988985.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32958483
pii: bmjopen-2019-035973
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035973
pmc: PMC7507856
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03988985']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e035973Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
JAMA. 2005 Apr 6;293(13):1635-43
pubmed: 15811983
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57
pubmed: 9881538
J Affect Disord. 2014 Jan;152-154:45-51
pubmed: 24183486
J Affect Disord. 2008 Jan;105(1-3):81-91
pubmed: 17532051
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;48:51-55
pubmed: 28917395
BJPsych Open. 2016 Mar 9;2(2):127-138
pubmed: 27703765
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 May;3(5):415-24
pubmed: 27083119
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Apr 19;15:34
pubmed: 25927192
JAMA. 2016 Jan 26;315(4):380-7
pubmed: 26813211
Health Expect. 2020 Apr 14;:
pubmed: 32286005
J Affect Disord. 2004 Feb;78(2):131-40
pubmed: 14706723
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;210(2):132-139
pubmed: 27908896
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
J Affect Disord. 2011 Apr;130(1-2):26-36
pubmed: 20708274
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;24(4):287-96
pubmed: 26796924
BMJ. 2011 Aug 18;343:d4825
pubmed: 21852353
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Oct 1;176(10):1482-1491
pubmed: 27571438
BMC Med. 2010 Mar 24;8:18
pubmed: 20334633
JAMA. 2013 Nov 6;310(17):1818-28
pubmed: 24193079
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2000;(39):s28-33
pubmed: 10945075
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 14;12(8):e0181021
pubmed: 28806775
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013 May;56(5-6):733-9
pubmed: 23703492
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Aug;64:1-12
pubmed: 30014862
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 1;369(5):448-57
pubmed: 23902484
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010 Jul;122(1):75-85
pubmed: 19922523
Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1194-201
pubmed: 15550799
Med Care. 2008 Mar;46(3):266-74
pubmed: 18388841
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 30;8(9):e74786
pubmed: 24098669
Lancet. 2009 Aug 22;374(9690):609-19
pubmed: 19640579
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jan 24;19(1):19
pubmed: 29368585
BMC Med. 2014 Jan 28;12:13
pubmed: 24472580
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 2;13(8):e0201612
pubmed: 30071067
J Psychosom Res. 2016 Nov;90:51-56
pubmed: 27772559
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Feb;61(583):e72-80
pubmed: 21276327